Finiteness, mood, and morphosyntax

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-32

  Anderson, John M ^a  

^a NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847610091     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226706004439     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Adger, David (to appear). Three domains of finiteness: a minimalist perspective. In Nikolaeva (ed.).
2. Anderson, John M. (1971). The grammar of case: towards a localistic theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Anderson, John M. (1990). On the status of auxiliaries in notional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 26. 341-362.
4. Anderson, John M. (19973). A notional theory of syntactic categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Anderson, John M. (1997b). Finiteness and auxiliarihood. In Rydén, Mats, Kardela, Henryk, Nordlander, Johan & Odenstedt, Bengt (eds.), From runes to romance: a Festschrift for Gunnar Persson on his sixtieth birthday. Uppsala: Swedish Science Press. 1-20.
6. Anderson, John M. (2001a). Finiteness, in Greek, and elsewhere. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 37. 5-33.
7. Anderson, John M. (2001b). Modals, subjunctives and (non-)finiteness. English Language and Linguistics 5. 159-166.
8. Anderson, John M. (2004). Syntactic categories and syntactic change: the development of subjunctive periphrases in English. In Moskowich-Spiegel Fandiño, Isabel & Crespo Garcia, Begoña (eds.), New trends in English historical linguistics: an Atlantic view. Coruña: Universidade da Coruña. 31-73.
9. Anderson, John M. (20053). Structuralism and autonomy: from Saussure to Chomsky. Historiographia Linguistica 32. 117-148.
10. Anderson, John M. (2005b). The non-autonomy of syntax. Folia Linguistica 39. 223-250.
11. Anderson, Stephen R. (1985). Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 150-201.
12. Bach, Emmon (1967). Have and be in English syntax. Language 43. 462-485.
13. Bloch, Jules (1906-1908). La phrase nominale en Sanskrit. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique 14, 27-96.
14. Bloomfield, Leonard (1933). Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
15. Chomsky, Noam (1988). Language and problems of knowledge: the Managua lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Cole, Peter (1982). Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. Craig, Colette G. (1977). The structure of Jacaltec. Austin: University of Texas Press.
18. Cristofaro, Sonia (to appear). Finiteness in functional-typological perspective. In Nikolaeva (ed.).
19. Denison, David (1993). English historical syntax. London & New York: Longman.
20. Dik, Simon C. (1997). The theory of functional grammar, 2 : Complex and derived constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Disterheft, Dorothy (1980). The syntactic development of the infinitive in Indo-European. Columbus, OH : Slavica.
22. Evans, Nicholas (to appear). Insubordination and its uses. In Nikolaeva (ed.).
23. Fisher, Karen (1988). Agreement and the distribution of anaphora. In Hammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith & Wirth, Jessica (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 25-36.
24. Gauthiot, Robert (1908-1909). La phrase nominale en finno-ougrien. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique 15. 201-236.
25. George, Leland & Kornfilt, Jaklin (1981). Finiteness and boundedness in Turkish. In Frank Heny (ed.), Binding and filtering. London: Croom Helm. 105-127.
26. Gildersleeve, B. L. & Lodge, Gonzalez (1867/1968). Latin grammar. London: Macmillan. [Reference is to 3rd edn., 1968.]
27. Givón, Talmy (1990). Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Gregores, E. & Suárez, J. A. (1967). A description of colloquial Guarani. The Hague: Mouton.
30. Haegeman, Liliane & Guéron, Jacqueline (1999). English grammar: a generative perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
31. Hammer, A. E. (1983). German grammar and usage. London: Edward Arnold.
32. Hewitt, B. G. (1987). The typology of subordination in Georgian and Abkhaz. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
33. Hjelmslev, Louis (1948). Le verbe et la phrase nominale. In Mélanges de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes offerts à J. Marouzeau, 253-281. [Reprinted in Hjelmslev (1959), 165-191.]
34. Hjelmslev, Louis (1959). Essais linguistiques [= Travaux du cercle linguistique de Copenhague, XII]. Copenhagen: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.
35. Holes, Clive (1990). Gulf Arabic. London: Routledge.
36. Holmberg, Anders, Nikanne, Urpo, Oraviita, Irmeli, Reime, Hannu & Trosterud, Trond (1993). The structure of INFL and the finite clause in Finnish. In Holmberg, Anders & Nikanne, Urpo (eds.), Case and other functional categories in Finnish syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 177-206.
37. Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene (1997). Greek: a comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.
38. Hopper, Paul J. (1972). Verbless stative sentences in Indonesian. In Verhaar, John W. M. (ed.), The verb 'be' and its synonyms, 5: Urdu, Turkish, Bengali, Amharic, Indonesian, Telugu, Estonian. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. 115-152.
39. Huber, Walter & Kummer, Werner (1974). Transformationelle Syntax des Deutschen, I. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
40. Huddleston, Rodney D. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Jelinek, Eloise & Demers, Richard (1994). Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language 70. 697-736.
43. Jespersen, Otto (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.
44. Jespersen, Otto (1933). Essentials of English grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.
45. Joseph, Brian D. (1983). The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive: a study in areal, historical, and general linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Kahn, Charles H. (1973). The verb 'be' and its synonyms, 6: The verb 'be' in Ancient Greek. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
47. Koptjevskaya-Tamm, M. (1993). Finiteness. In Asher, R. E. & Simpson, J. M. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics. Oxford & Aberdeen: Pergamon Press & Aberdeen University Press. 1245-1248.
48. Ledgeway, Adam (to appear). Diachrony and finiteness: subordination in the dialects of Southern Italy. In Nikolaeva (ed.).
49. Lyons, John (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Matthews, P. H. (1997). Oxford concise dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Meillet, Antoine (1906-1908). La phrase nominale en indo-européen. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique 14. 1-26.
52. Miller, D. Gary (2003). Where do conjugated infinitives come from? Diachronica 20. 43-80.
53. Mithun, Marianne (1999). The languages of native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Nikolaeva, Irina (ed.) (to appear). Finiteness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Nikolaeva, Irina (to appear a). Introduction to Nikolaeva (ed.).
56. Nikolaeva, Irina (to appear b). Constructional economy and non-finite independent clauses. In Nikolaeva (ed.).
57. Platzack, Christer & Rosengren, Inger (1998). On the subject of imperatives : a minimalist account of the imperative clause. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1. 177-224.
58. Poutsma, H. (1926). A grammar of Late Modern English, part II: The parts of speech, section II. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
59. Ramée, Pierre de la (1585). The Latine grammar of P. Ramus: translated into English. London. [Facsimile edn. by Theatrum Orbis Terrarum & Da Capo Press, Amsterdam & New York, 1971.]
60. Raposo, E. (1987). Case theory and Infl-to-Comp : the inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 85-109.
61. Sacleux, Charles (1908-1909). Le verbe «ětre» dans les langues bantoues. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique 15. 152-160.
62. Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas (1999). Syntactic theory: a formal introduction. Stanford : CSLI.
63. Saussure, Ferdinand de (1916/1962). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. [Reference is to 5th edn., 1962.]
64. Sridhar, S. N. (1990). Kannada. London: Routledge.
65. Stassen, Leon (1997). Intransitive predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Vincent, Nigel (1998). On the grammar of inflected non-finite forms (with special reference to Old Neapolitan). In Korzen, I. & Herslund, M. (eds.), Clause combining and text structure. Copenhagen: Samfundsliteratur. 135-158.