The Non-autonomy of Syntax

Folia Linguistica

Volumn 39, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 223-250

  Anderson, John M ^a  

^a NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847634302     PISSN: 01654004     EISSN: 16147308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/flin.2006.39.3-4.223     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Alarcos Llorach, Emilio 1999. Gramática de la lengua española Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
2. Anderson, John M. 1989. “Reflexions on Notional Grammar, with some Remarks on its Relevance to Issues in the Analysis of English and its History.” In: Doug Arnold, Martin Atkinson, Jacques Durand, Claire Glover & Louise Sadler (eds.), Essays on Grammatical Theory and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13-36.
3. Anderson, John M. 1991. “Notional Grammar and the Redundancy of Syntax.” Studies in Language 15, 301-333.
4. Anderson, John M. 1997. A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Anderson, John M. 2003. “On the Structure of Names.” Folia Linguistica 37, 347-398.
6. Anderson, John M. 2004a. “On the Grammatical Status of Names.” Language 80, 435-474.
7. Anderson, John M. 2004b. “Grammar and Meaning: Two Cheers for Structuralism.” [= Report no. ILCI-03-LIC-13, Institute for Logic, Cognition, Language and Information.] Donostia: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
8. Anderson, John M. 2005a. “Structural Analogy and Universal Grammar.” Lingua. [Special issue = Bermudez-Otero & Honeybone (eds.).]
9. Anderson, John M. 2005b. “Structuralism and Autonomy: From Saussure to Chomsky.” Histo-riographia Linguistica 32, 117-148.
10. Anderson, John M. 2005c. “The Groundedness of Grammar.” In: Andreas Stuhlmann & Patrick Studer (eds.), Language-Text-Bildung: Essays in Honour of Beate Dreike. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 13-21.
11. Anderson, John M. in press a. “Let and the 'Bare Infinitive': An Exploratory Exercise in Traditional (Notional) Grammar.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 41.
12. Anderson, John M. in press b. Modern Grammars of Case: A Retrospective Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Bally, Charles 1952. Le langage et la vie Geneva and Lille: Libraire Droz and Librairie Giard.
15. Bermudez-Otero, Ricardo & Patrick Honeybone 2005. Introduction to Bermudez-Otero & Honeybone (eds.).
16. Bermudez-Otero, Ricardo & Patrick Honeybone (eds.) 2005. Linguistic Knowledge: Perspectives from Phonology and Syntax. [= Special issue of Lingua.]
17. Bloomfield, Leonard 1933. Language New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
18. Bossong, Georg 1985. Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
19. Broschart, Jürgen, 1997. “Why Tongan does it Differently: Categorical Distinctions in a Language without Nouns and Verbs.” Linguistic Typology 1, 123-165.
20. Burton-Roberts, Noel 2000. 'Where and What is Phonology? A Representational Perspective.” In: Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr & Gerry Docherty (eds.), Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39-66.
21. Chomsky, Noam 1957. Syntactic Structures The Hague: Mouton.
22. Chomsky, Noam 1966a. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought New York: Harper & Row.
23. Chomsky, Noam 1966b. “Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar.” In: Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, III: Theoretical Foundations. The Hague: Mouton, 1-60.
24. Chomsky, Noam 1969. “The Current Scene in Linguistics.” In: David Reibel & Sanford Schane (eds.), Modern Studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1-18.
25. Chomsky, Noam 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In: Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Massachusetts: Ginn, 184-221.
26. Chomsky, Noam 1972. “Some Empirical Issues in the Theory of Transformational Grammar.” In: Stanley Peters (ed.), Goals of Linguistic Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Pren-tice-Hall, 63-130.
27. Chomsky, Noam 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation Amsterdam: North-Holland.
28. Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures Dordrecht: Foris.
29. Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
30. Colman, Fran & John Anderson 2004. “Metonymy as Word-formation: With Special Reference to Old English.” English Studies 85, 547-565.
31. Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (Second Edition) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
32. Croft, William 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations The Cognitive Organization of Information Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Croft, William 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Davidson, Donald & Gilbert Harman (eds.) 1972. Semantics of Natural Language Dordrecht: Reidel.
35. Dowty, David 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar Dordrecht: Reidel.
36. Dowty, David 1989. “On the Semantic Content of the Notion of 'Thematic Role'.” In: Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee & Raymond Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meanings, 2: Semantic Issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 69-129.
37. Dowty, David 1991. “Thematic Roles and Argument Selection.” Language 67, 547-619.
38. Fischer, Olga C.M. 1990. Syntactic Change and Causation: Developments in Infinitival Constructions in English Amsterdam: Amsterdam Studies in Generative Grammar, 2.
39. Fischer, Olga C.M. 1995. “The Distinction between Bare and To-Infinitival Complements in Late Middle English.” Diachronica 12, 1-30.
40. Fischer, Olga C.M. 1996. “Verbal Complementation in Early Middle English. How do the Infinitives Fit In?” In: Derek Britton (ed.), English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 247-270.
41. Fodor, Jerry A. 1970. “Three Reasons for Not Deriving 'Kill' from 'Cause to Die'.” Linguistic Inquiry 1, 429-438.
42. Frey, Werner & Karin Pittner 1998. “Zur Positionierung der Adverbiale im deutschen Mittelfeld.” Linguistische Berichte 176, 489-534.
43. Frey, Werner & Karin Pittner 1999. “Adverbialpositionen im deutsch-englischen Vergleich.” In: M. Doherty (ed.), Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informationsverteilung. Berlin: AkademieVerlag, 14-40.
44. Fries, Charles C. 1952. The Structure of English: An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
45. Gary-Prieur, Marie-Noelle 1994. Grammaire du nom propre Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
46. Givón, Talmy 1979. On Understanding Grammar New York: Academic Press.
47. Grimshaw, Jane 1990. Argument Structure Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
48. Haiman, John (ed.) 1985. Iconicity in Syntax Amsterdam: Benjamins.
49. Harris, James 1751. Hermes, or a Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Language and Universal Grammar [Reprinted 1968, Menston: Scolar Press.]
50. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson 1980. “Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.” Language 56, 251-299.
51. Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
52. Jackendoff, Ray S. 1976. “Toward an Explanatory Semantic Representation.” Linguistic Inquiry 7, 89-150.
53. Jackendoff, Ray S. 1990. Semantic Structures Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
54. Jackendoff, Ray S. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Joos, Martin (ed.) 1958. Readings in Linguistics: The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America since 1925 New York: American Council of Learned Societies.
56. Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
57. Kimball, John 1970. “'Remind' Remains.” Linguistic Inquiry 1, 511-523.
58. Koerner, E.F.K. 1978. [1976]. “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Paradigms.” Towards a Historiography of Linguistics: Selected Essays, ch.2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [First published in: Hermann Parret (ed.), History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 21-54.]
59. Kornai, A. & G.K. Pullum 1990. “The X-bar Theory of Phrase Structure.” Language 66, 2450.
60. Lakoff, George 1965. [1970]. On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity. (Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation, report NSF-16). Cambridge Massachusetts: Computation Laboratory, Harvard University. [Published as Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.]
61. Lakoff, George 1971. “On Generative Semantics.” In: Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jacobovits (eds.), 232-296.
62. Lakoff, George 1972. “Linguistics and Natural Logic.” In: Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), 545-665.
63. Lancelot, C. & A. Arnauld 1660. Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Paris.
64. Levin, Beth 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav 1995. Unaccusativity Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.
66. Lyons, John 1966. “Towards a 'Notional' Theory of the 'Parts of Speech'.” Journal of Linguistics 2, 209-235.
67. Lyons, John 1970. Chomsky London: Fontana.
68. Lyons, John 1977. Semantics, II Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. McCawley, James D. 1971. “Where do Noun Phrases Come From?” In: Steinberg & Jacobovits (eds.), 217-231.
70. McCawley, James D. 1972. “A Programme for Logic.” In: Davidson & Harman (eds.), 498544.
71. McCawley, James D. 1985. Review of Frederick J Newmeyer, Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and Possibilities (Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1983), Language 61, 668-679.
72. Mithun, Marianne 1999. The Languages of Native North America Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. “Case Marking of Objects.” In: Joseph L. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Human Language, 4: Syntax. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 249-289.
74. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1986. The Politics of Linguistics Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
75. Postal, Paul M. 1971. “On the Surface Verb 'Remind'.” In: Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 181-272.
76. Pustet, Regina 2003. Copulas Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Radford, Andrew 1988. Transformational Grammar: A First Course Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. de Saussure, F. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger. Lausanne & Paris: Payot. [2nd ed, Paris: Payot, 1922; 3rd and last corrected ed, 1931.]
79. Simone, R. (ed.) 1994. Iconicity in Language Amsterdam: Benjamins.
80. Stassen, Leon 1997. Intransitive Predication Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Steinberg, Danny D. & Leon A. Jacobovits (eds.) 1971. Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Vincent, Nigel 1980. “Some Issues in the Theory of Word Order.” York Papers in Linguistics 8, 167-179.
83. Vogel, Petra M. & Bernard Comrie (eds.) 2000. Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
84. Wilkins, Wendy 1987. “Thematic Structure and Reflexivisation.” In: Wendy Wilkins (ed.), On the Nature of Thematic Roles. New York: Academic Press, 191-213.