Reproductive indicators in natural populations of Douglas-fir in Mexico

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 727-742

  Mapula Larreta M ^a   Lopez Upton J ^a   Vargas Hernandez J J ^a   Hernandez Livera A ^a  

^a Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

Author keywords

Conservation; Inbreeding index; Pseudotsuga; Reproductive indicators; Reproductive success; Seed production

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROUS TREE; INBREEDING; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEED PRODUCTION; SEED SIZE; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 33847608423     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-5821-y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allen G.S. and Owens J.N. 1972. The Life History of Douglas-fir. Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, ON, 139 p.
2. Beaulieu J. and Simon J.P. 1995. Variation in cone morphology and seed characters in Pinus strobus in Quebec. Can. J. Bot. 73: 262-271.
3. Bramlett D.L. 1974. Seed potential and seed efficiency. In: Kraus J. (ed.), Seed Yield from Southern Pine Seed Orchards. Georgia Forestry Center, Macon, Georgia, 7 p.
4. Bramlett D.L. 1993. Diagnosing Low Seed and Cone Yields from Controlled Pollinations of Southern Pines. 22nd Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Atlanta, Ga. June 14-17, pp. 35-42.
5. Bramlett D.L., Belcher E.W. Jr., DeBarr G.L., Hertel J.L., Karrefalt R.P., Lantz C.E., Miller T., Ware K.D. and Yates H.O.III. 1977. Cone Analysis of Southern Pines: A Guide Book. General Technical Report SE-13. USDA, Forest Service, Asheville, North Carolina, 28 p.
6. Campbell R.K. 1987. Biogeographical distribution limits of Douglas-fir in Southwest Oregon. Forest Ecol. Manage. 18: 1-34.
7. Cibrián-Tovar D., Méndez-Montiel J.T., Campos-Bolaños R., Yates H.O.III. and Flores-Lara J. 1995. Forest Insects of Mexico. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, México, 453 p.
8. Debreczy Z. and Rácz I. 1995. New species and varieties of conifers from Mexico. Phytologia 78: 217-243.
9. Domínguez-Alvarez F.A. 1994. Análisis histórico- ecológico de los bosques de Pseudotsuga en México. INIFAP-CIR Golfo Centro. Folleto Técnico No. 23. México, 43 p.
10. Frankham R. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conserv. Biol. 12: 665-675.
11. Guerra de la Cruz V. 2001. Stand Structure and Dynamics of Isolated Pseudotsuga Forests in Southern North America. Ph.D. thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, 92 p.
12. Hemann R.K. and Lavender D.P. 1999. Douglas-fir planted forests. New Forests 17: 53-70.
13. Ho R.H. 1980. Pollination mechanism and seed production potential in Douglas-fir. Forest Sci. 26: 522-528.
14. Iverson L.R. and Prasad A.M. 2002. Potential redistribution of tree species habitat under five climate change scenarios in the eastern US. Forest Ecol. Manage. 155: 205-222.
15. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W. and Wolfinger R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 633 p.
16. López-Upton J. and Donahue J.K. 1995. Seed production of Pinus greggii Engelm. in natural stands in Mexico. Tree Plant. Notes 46: 1-10.
17. Lyons L.A. 1956. The seed production capacity and efficiency of red pine cones (Pinus resinosa Ait.). Can. J. Bot. 34: 27-36.
18. Mápula-L. M., Bonilla-B. R. and Rodríguez-T. D.A. 1996. Germinación y crecimiento inicial de Pseudotsuga macrolepis Flous, en Chapingo, México. Revista Chapingo, Ciencias Forestales (México) 2: 111-117.
19. Martínez M. 1963. Las Pinaceas Mexicanas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, pp. 27-74.
20. McAuley L. 1990. Coastal Douglas-fir Cone Analysis Results. British Columbia. Ministry of Forests, Silviculture Branch. Internal Report 8653K.
21. Melillo J.M. 1999. Warm, warm on the range. Science 283: 183-184.
22. Mitton J.B. 1992. The dynamic mating systems of conifers. New Forests 6: 197-216.
23. Mosseler A., Major J.E., Simpson J.D., Daigle B., Lange K., Park Y.S., Johnsen K.H. and Rajora O.P. 2000. Indicators of population viability in red spruce, Picea rubens. I. Reproductive traits and fecundity. Can. J. Bot. 78: 928-940.
24. Narváez-F. R. 2000. Estimación de la cosecha de semilla de Pinus arizonica Engelm., con base en la producción de conos, en la región de Madera, Chih. INIFAP-CIR Norte-Centro. Folleto Técnico No. 2. México, 29 p.
25. Owens J.N., Colangeli A.M. and Morris S.J. 1991. Factors affecting seed set in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Can. J. Bot. 69: 229-238.
26. Owens J.N. and Simpson S.J. 1982. Further observations on the pollination mechanism and seed production. Can. J. Forest Res. 12: 431-434.
27. Owston P.W. and Stein W.I. 1974. Pseudotsuga Carr. Douglas-fir. In: Schopmeyer C.S. (ed.), Seeds of Woody Plants in the United States. Agriculture Handbook 450. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., pp. 674-683.
28. Rajora O.P. and Mosseler A. 2001. Challenges and opportunities for conservation of forest genetic resources. Euphytica 118: 197-212.
29. Reyes-H. J.V., Vargas-H. J.J. and López-U. J. 2005. Variación morfológica y anatómica en poblaciones mexicanas de Pseudotsuga (Pinaceae). Acta Botánica Mexicana 70: 47-67.
30. Saccheri I., Kuussaari M., Kankare M., Vikman P., Fortelius W. and Hanski I. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491-494.
31. SAS Institute Inc. 1998. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. Version 8.0. Cary, NC, USA.
32. Schemske D.W. and Lande R. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
33. Sorensen F.C. 1971. Estimate of self-fertility in coastal Douglas-fir from inbreeding studies. Silvae Genet. 20: 115-120.
34. Sorensen F.C. 1973. Performance of wind-pollination families and intra- and inter-stand crosses on contrasting forest soils. USDA Forest Service Research Note PNW-207, 7 p.
35. Sorensen F.C. and Campbell R.K. 1993. Seed weight-seedling size correlation in coastal Douglasfir: genetic and environmental components. Can. J. Forest Res. 23: 275-285.
36. Sorensen F.C. and Campbell R.K. 1997. Near neighbor pollination and plant vigor in coastal Douglas-fir. Forest Genet. 4: 149-157.
37. Sorensen F.C. and Cress D.W. 1994. Effects of sib mating on cone and seeds traits in coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet. 43: 338-345.
38. Sorensen F.C. and Miles R.S. 1974. Self-pollination effects on Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine seeds and seedlings. Silvae Genet. 23: 135-138.
39. Sorensen F.C. and Miles R.S. 1978. Cone and seed weight relationships in Douglas-fir from western and central Oregon. Ecology 59: 641-644.
40. Webber J.E. and Painter R.A. 1996. Douglas-fir Pollen Management Manual, 2nd edn. Research Branch, Ministry of Forestry, Victoria, B.C., 91 p.
41. Woods J.H. and Heaman J.C. 1989. Effect of different inbreeding levels on filled seed production in Douglas-fir. Can. J. Forest Res. 19: 54-59.
42. Yáñez-Espinoza L. 1991. Análisis de la producción de semilla de Pseudotsuga macrolepis Flous en una población natural de la Sierra de Pachuca, Hidalgo. Bachelor Thesis. División de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, México, 116 p.
43. Yazdani R. and Lindgren D. 1991. The impact of self-pollination on production of sound selfed seeds. In: Fineschi S., Malvolti M.E., Cannata F. and Hattemer H.H. (eds), Biochemical Markers in the Population Genetics of Forest Trees. SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 143-147.
44. Young J.M. and Young Ch.G. 1992. Seeds of Woody Plants in North America. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, 407 p.
45. Zavala-Ch. F. and Méndez-M. J.T. 1996. Factores que afectan la producción de semilla en Pseudotsuga macrolepis Flous en el estado de Hidalgo, México. Acta Botánica Mexicana 36: 1-13.