An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: A case study for Antalya region of Turkey

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 89-95

  Ozkan, Burhan ^a   Kurklu, Ahmet ^a   Akcaoz, Handan ^a  

^a AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Antalya; Energy equivalent; Energy Use; Greenhouses; Input output; Vegetables

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS; AGRICULTURE; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSES; NATURAL RESOURCES; PESTICIDES;

NUTRIENT LOADING;

BIOMASS;

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; ENERGY USE; HORTICULTURE; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; VEGETABLE;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

AVES; CUCUMIS SATIVUS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; SOLANUM MELONGENA;

EID: 0345526475     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00080-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baudoin WO. Protected cultivation in the Mediterranean region. Acta Horticulture 1999;486:23-30.
2. Mugnoza GZ. Greenhouse functional and structural aspects: a European network project. Paper Presented at the World Conference on Horticultural Research, Rome, Italy, 17-20 June 1998.
3. Sevgican A. Protected cultivation in Turkey. Acta Horticulture 1999;486:31-4.
4. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Report of Antalya Province, 2000 (in Turkish).
5. Ram RA, Raghuvanshi NK, Arya SV. Study on energy cost requirements for wheat cultivation. ISAE. XVII. Annual Convention. Paper No: 80-105, New Delhi, 1980.
6. Pathak B, Binning AS. Energy use pattern and potential for energy saving in rice-wheat cultivation. Agric. Energy 1985;4:271-8.
7. Yadav RN, Singh RKP, Prasad S. An economic analysis of energy requirements in the production of potato crop in Bihar Sharif Block of Nalanda District (Bihar). Economic Affairs 1991;36:112-9.
8. Singh S, Singh G. Energy input crop yield relationship for four major crops of Northern India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America 1992;23(2):57-61.
9. Thakur CL, Mishra BL. Energy requirements and energy gaps for production of major crops in Madhya Pradesh. Agricultural Situation of India 1993;48:665-89.
10. Yaldiz O, Ozturk HH, Zeren Y, Bascetincelik A. Energy use in field crops of Turkey. 5. International Congress of Agricultural Machinery and Energy, Kusadasi, Turkey, 1993, (in Turkish).
11. Shapouri H, Duffield JA, Graboski MS. Estimating the net energy balance of corn ethanol. Agricultural Economic Report No 721. US, Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Office of Energy, 1995.
12. Baruah DC, Bhattacharya PC. Utilization pattern of human and fuel energy in tea plantation. Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science 1995;8(2):189-92.
13. Singh S, Verma SR, Mittal JP. Energy requirements for production of major crops in India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America 1997;28(4):13-7.
14. Singh JM. On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. Master of Science, International Institute of Management University of Flensburg, Germany, 2002.
15. Chandra H, De Dipanker, Singh, RS. Spatial variation in energy use pattern for paddy cultivation in India. Proceedings of National Workshop on Energy and Environment Management for Sustainable Development of Agriculture and Agro Industrial Sector, 8-9 July, India, 2001, p. 48-51.
16. Yamane T. Elementary sampling theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
17. DPT. A research on Turkish family structure. General Directorate of Social Planning. Ankara: DPT Publications, 1993 (in Turkish).
18. Kaplan M, Sonmez S, Tokmak S. The nitrate content of well waters in the Kumluca region-Antalya. Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 1999;23:309-14.
19. MAFF. Energy use in organic farming systems. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Research and Development Final Project Report 2000.
20. Shrestha DS. Energy use efficiency indicator for agriculture, 1998. http://www.usaskca/agriculture/caedac/PDF/ mcrae.PDF,10/10/2002.