Interactive effects of ozone and climate on water use, soil moisture content and streamflow in a southern Appalachian forest in the USA

New Phytologist

Volumn 174, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 125-136

  McLaughlin, S B ^a,b   Wullschleger, S D ^b   Sun, G ^c   Nosal, M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Appalachia; Climate; Forests; Ozone; Soils; Streamflow; Water use

Indexed keywords

OZONE; WATER;

CLIMATE EFFECT; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH RESPONSE; OZONE; SOIL MOISTURE; STREAMFLOW; TRANSPIRATION; TREE; WATER USE;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT STEM; SOIL; SWEATING; TREE; UNITED STATES;

APPALACHIAN REGION; CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; OZONE; PLANT STEMS; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; SOIL; TREES; WATER;

NORTH AMERICA; TENNESSEE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847418935     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01970.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andreassian V. 2004. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. Journal of Hydrology 291: 1-27.
2. Chang M. 2003. Forest hydrology: An introduction to water and forests. Washington, DC, USA: CRC Press.
3. Evett JB, Love MA, Gordon JM. 1994. Effects of urbanization and landuse changes on low streamflow. Report No. 284. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: Water Resources Research Institute, University of North Carolina.
4. Felzer B, Kicklighter DW, Melillo JM, Wang C, Zhuang Q and Prinn R. 2004. Effects of ozone on net primary production and carbon sequestration in the conterminous United States using a biogeochemistry model. Tellus 56B: 230-248.
5. Giese GL, Mason RR Jr. 1991. Low-flow characteristics of streams in North Carolina. Open File Report No. 90-399. Washington DC, USA: US Geological Survey.
6. Granier A. 1987. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology 3: 309-320.
7. Grulke NE, Andersen CP, Fenn ME, Miller PR. 1998. Ozone exposure and nitrogen deposition lowers root biomass of ponderosa pine in the San Bernardino Mountains, California. Environmental Pollution 103: 63-73.
8. 3 uptake of ponderosa pine in a Mediterranean climate. Environmental Pollution 119: 163-175.
9. Grulke NE, Preisler HK, Rose C, Kirsch J, Balduman L. 2002b. O3 uptake and drought stress effects on carbon acquisition of ponderosa pine in natural stands. New Phytologist 154: 621-631.
10. 3 exposure metrics. Tree Physiology 24: 1001-1010.
11. Hanson PJ, Weltzin JF. 2000. Drought disturbance from climatic change: response of United States forests. Science of the Total Environment 262: 205-220.
12. Hanson PJ, Todd DE Jr, Amthor JS. 2001. A six-year study of sapling and large-tree growth and mortality responses to natural and induced variability in precipitation and throughfall. Tree Physiology 21: 345-358.
13. Hanson PJ, Todd DE, Joslin JD. 2003. Canopy production. In: Hanson PJ, Wullschleger SD, eds. North American temperate deciduous forest responses to changing precipitation regimes. Ecological Studies Vol. 166. New York: Springer, 308-315.
14. Hewlett JD. 1982. Principles of forest hydrology. Athens, GA, USA: University of Georgia Press.
15. Hsaio TC, Acevedo E, Fereres E, Henderson DW. 1976. Stress metabolism. Water stress, growth, and osmotic adjustment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 273: 479-500.
16. International Panel on Global Climate Change. 2001. Technical Summary. In: Report of the Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat.
17. Johnson R. 1998. The forest cycle and low river flows: a review of UK and international studies. Forest Ecology and Management 109: 1-7.
18. Kattenberg A, Giorgi F, Grassl H, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Stouffer RJ, Tokioka T, Weaver AJ, Wigley TML. 1996. Climate models - projections of future climate. In: Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K, eds. Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press, 285-357.
19. Keller T, Hasler R. 1984. The influence of a fall fumigation with ozone on stomatal behavior of spruce and fir. Oecologia 64: 284-286.
20. Lee WS, Chevone BI, Seiler JR. 1990. Growth and gas exchange of loblolly pine seedlings as influenced by drought and air pollutants. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 51: 105-116.
21. Loya WM, Pregitzer KS, Karburg NJ, King JS, Giardina CP. 2003. Reduction in soil carbon formation by tropospheric ozone under increased carbon dioxide levels. Nature 425: 705-707.
22. Luxmoore RJ, Pearson SM, Tharp ML, McLaughlin SB. 1997. Scaling up physiological responses of loblolly pine to variation in ozone and rainfall. In: Mickler RA, Fox S, eds. The productivity and sustainability of southern forest ecosystems in a changing environment. New York: Springer, 407-428.
23. Maier-Maercker U. 1997. Experiments on the water balance of individual attached twigs of Picea abies (L.) Karst. in pure and ozone-enriched air. Trees 11: 229-239.
24. Maier-Maercker U. 1998. Predisposition of trees to drought stress by ozone. Tree Physiology 19: 71-78.
25. Maier-Maercker U, Koch W. 1992. The effect of air pollution on the mechanism of stomatal control. Trees 7: 12-25.
26. Mansfield T. 1998. Stomata and plant water relations: does air pollution create problems. Environmental Pollution 101: 1-11.
27. Matyssek R, Gunthardt-Goerg M, Maurer S, Keller T. 1995. Nighttime exposure to ozone reduces whole-plant production in Betula pendula. Tree Physiology 15: 159-165.
28. McAinish MR, Evans NH, Montgomery LT, North KA. 2002. Calcium signaling in stomatal responses to pollutants. New Phytologist 153: 441-447.
29. McGuinness JL, Harrold L. 1971. Reforestation influences on small watershed streamflow. Water Resources Research 7: 845-852.
30. McLaughlin SB, Downing DJ. 1995. Interactive effects of ambient ozone measured on mature forest trees. Nature 374: 252-257.
31. McLaughlin SB, Downing DJ. 1996. Interactive effects of ambient ozone and climate measured on mature loblolly pine trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 670-681.
32. McLaughlin SB, Nosal M, Wullschleger SD, Sun G. 2007. Interactive effects of ozone and climate on tree growth and water use in a southern Appalachian forest in the USA. New Phytologist 174: 109-124.
33. McLaughlin SB, Percy K. 1999. Forest health in North America: some perspectives on actual and potential roles of climate and air pollution. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 116: 151-197.
34. Orwig DA, Abrams MD. 1997.Variation in radial growth responses to drought among species, site, and canopy strata. Trees 11: 474-484.
35. Palmer WC. 1965. Meteorological drought. Washington, DC, USA: Weather Bureau.
36. Pearson M, Mansfield TA. 1993. Interacting effects of ozone and water stress on the stomatal resistance of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). New Phytologist 123: 351-358.
37. Peterson DL, Silsbee DG, Poth M, Arbough J, Biles FE. 1995. Growth responses of big-cone Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga macrocarpa) to long term ozone exposure in southern California. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 45: 36-45.
38. Reeves DW. 1997. The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil Tillage Research 43: 131-167.
39. Reich PB, Lassoie JP. 1984. Effects of low level ozone exposure on leaf diffusive conductance and water use efficiency caused be air pollutants. Plant, Cell & Environment 7: 661-668.
40. Robinson M, Cognard-Plancq A-L, Cosandey C, David J, Durand P, Führer H-W, Hall R, Hendriques MO, Marc V, Mccarthy R, McDonnell M, Martin C, Nisbet T, O'Dea P, Rodgers M, Zollner A. 2003. Studies of the impact of forests on peak flows and baseflows: a European perspective. Forest Ecology and Management 186: 85-97.
41. Samuelson L, Kelly JM. 2001.Scaling ozone effects from seedlings to forest trees. Tansley Review 21. New Phytologist 149: 21-41.
42. Schneider SH. 1989. The greenhouse effect: science and policy. Science 243: 771-781.
43. Schulze E-D, Robichaux RH, Grace J, Rundel PW, Ehrleringer JR. 1987. Plant water balance. Bioscience 37: 30-37.
44. Skarby L, Troeng E, Bostrom C-A. 1987. Ozone uptake and effects on transpiration, net photosynthesis, and dark respiration. Forest Science 33: 801-808.
45. Smakhtin VU. 2001. Low flow hydrology: a review. Journal of Hydrology 240: 147-186.
46. Statistix. 2000. Analytical software for desktop applications, version 7.0. Talahassee, FL, USA: Analytical Software.
47. Tingey DT, Hogsett WE. 1985. Water stress reduces ozone injury via a stomatal mechanism. Plant Physiologist 77: 944-947.
48. Wallin G, Skarby L. 1992. The influence of ozone on the stomatal and non-stomatal limitation of photosynthesis in Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst exposed to soil moisture deficit. Trees 6: 128-136.
49. Wigley TMI, Briffa KR, Jones PD. 1984. Predicting plant productivity and water resources. Nature 312: 102-103.
50. Zahner R, Saucier JR, Myers RK. 1989. Tree-ring model interprets growth decline in natural stands of loblolly pine in the southeastern United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 612-621.