Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 146-156

  Snoeren, Peter R ^a   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Film screen mammography; Full field digital mammography; Gray scale registration; Rigid goemetric registration

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ACQUISITION; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MEDICAL IMAGING; RADIOLOGY; TUMORS;

FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY; FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; GRAY-SCALE REGISTRATION; RIGID GEOMETRIC REGISTRATION;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; GRAY SCALE ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGIST; REGISTRATION; SIGNAL DETECTION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 33847403485     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2006.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Burnside E.S., Sickles E.A., Sohlich R.E., and Dee K.E. Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology 179 5 (2002) 1173-1177
2. Burt P.J., and Adelson E.H. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Transactions on Communications 31 4 (1983) 532-540
3. Burt P.J. Fast filter transforms for image processing. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 16 1 (1981) 20-51
4. Marias K., Behrenbruch C., Parbhoo S., Seifalian A., and Brady M. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 24 6 (2005) 782-790
5. Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2004. Available from: .
6. Pisano E.D., Cole E.B., Hemminger B.M., Yaffe M.J., Aylward S.R., Maidment A.D., Johnston R.E., Williams M.B., Niklason L.T., Conant E.F., Fajardo L.L., Kopans D.B., Brown M.E., and Pizer S.M. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 20 5 (2000) 1479-1491
7. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., Yaffe M., Baum J.K., Acharyya S., Conant E.F., Fajardo L.L., Bassett L., D'Orsi C., Jong R., and Rebner M. Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. The New England Journal of Medicine 353 17 (2005) 1773-1783
8. In: Pluim J.P.W., and Fitzpatrick J.M. (Eds). Special issue on image registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22 11 (2003)
9. Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., and Vetterling W.T. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. second ed. (1992), Cambridge University Press
10. Roelofs A.A.J., van Woudenberg S., Otten J.D.M., Hendriks J.H.C.L., Bödicker A., Evertsz C.J.G., and Karssemeijer N. Effect of soft-copy display supported by cad on mammography screening performance. European Radiology 16 1 (2006) 45-52
11. Sallam M.Y., and Bowyer K.W. Registration and difference analysis of corresponding mammogram images. Medical Image Analysis 3 2 (1999) 103-118
12. Snoeren P.R., and Karssemeijer N. Gray scale registration of mammograms using a model of image acquisition. In: Taylor C.J., and Noble J.A. (Eds). Information Processing in Medical Imaging 18th International Conference IPMI 2003, Ambleside, UK, July 20-25, 2003 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2732 (2003), Springer 401-412
13. Thurfjell M.G., Vitak B., Azavedo E., Svane G., and Thurfjell E. Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. Acta Radiologica 41 1 (2000) 52-56
14. van Engeland S., Snoeren P.R., Karssemeijer N., and Hendriks J.H.C.L. Optimized perception of lesion growth in mammograms using digital display. In: Chakraborty D.P., and Krupinski E.A. (Eds). Medical Imaging 2003: Image Perception Observer Performance and Technology Assessment vol. 5034 (2003), SPIE 25-31
15. Wirth M.A., Narhan J., and Gray D. Nonrigid mammogram registration using mutual information. In: Sonka M., and Fitzpatrick J.M. (Eds). Medical Imaging 2002: Image Processing vol. 4684 (2002), SPIE 562-573