Phenomenal permanence and the development of predictive tracking in infancy

Child Development

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 350-363

  Bertenthal, Bennett I ^a   Longo, Matthew R ^a   Kenny, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; CONCEPT FORMATION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT;

ATTENTION; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SACCADES;

EID: 33847403032     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: 14678624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01002.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1999). 2.5-month-old infants' reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 116-157.
2. Barnes, G. R., Donnelly, S. F., & Eason, R. D. (1987). Predictive velocity estimation in the pursuit reflex response to pseudo-random and step displacement stimuli in man. Journal of Physiology, 389, 111-136.
3. Bennett, S. J., & Barnes, G. R. (2006). Combined smooth and saccadic ocular pursuit during the transient occlusion of a moving visual object. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 313-321.
4. Bertenthal, B. I., Banton, T., & Bradbury, A. (1992). Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns. Perception, 22, 193-207.
5. Bertenthal, B. I., Proffitt, D. R., Spetner, N. B., & Thomas, M. A. (1985). The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions. Child Development, 56, 531-543.
6. Bertenthal, B. I., & von Hofsten, C. (1998). Eye, head and trunk control: The foundation for manual development. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22, 515-520.
7. Berthier, N. E., Bertenthal, B. I., Seaks, J. D., Sylvia, M. R., Johnson, R. L., & Clifton, R. K. (2001). Using object knowledge in visual tracking and reaching. Infancy, 2, 257-284.
8. Bower, T. G. R. (1971). The object in the world of the infant. Scientific American, 225, 30-38.
9. Bremner, J. G., Johnson, S. P., Slater, A., Mason, U., Foster, K., Cheshire, A., et al. (2005). Conditions for young infants' perception of object trajectories. Child Development, 76, 1029-1043.
10. Canfield, R. L., & Haith, M. M. (1991). Young infants' visual expectations for symmetric and asymmetric stimulus sequences. Developmental Psychology, 27, 198-208.
11. Churchland, M. M., Chou, I.-H., & Lisberger, S. G. (2003). Evidence for object permanence in the smooth-pursuit eye movements of monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 2205-2218.
12. Craton, L. G., & Yonas, A. (1988). Infants' sensitivity to boundary flow information for depth at an edge. Child Development, 59, 1522-1529.
13. Dodge, Y. (1985). Analysis of experiments with missing data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Engel, K. C., Anderson, J. H., & Soechting, J. F. (1999). Oculomotor tracking in two dimensions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1597-1602.
15. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Gibson, J. J., Kaplan, G. A., Reynolds, H. N. Jr., & Wheeler, K. (1969). The change from visible to invisible: A study of optical transitions. Perception and Psychophysics, 5, 113-116.
17. Granrud, C. E., Yonas, A., Smith, I. M., Arterberry, M. E., Glicksman, M. L., & Sorknes, A. C. (1984). Infants' sensitivity to accretion and deletion of texture as information for depth at an edge. Child Development, 55, 1630-1636.
18. Gredebäck, G., & von Hofsten, C. (2004). Infants' evolving representations of object motion during occlusion: A longitudinal study of 6- to 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 6, 165-184.
19. Gredebäck, G., von Hofsten, C., & Boudreau, J. P. (2002). Infants' visual tracking of continuous circular motion under conditions of occlusion and non-occlusion. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 161-182.
20. Haith, M. M. (1994). Visual expectations as the first step toward the development of future-oriented processes. In M. M. Haith, J. B. Benson, R. J. Roberts, & B. F. Pennington (Eds.), The development of future-oriented processes (pp. 11-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Johnson, S. P., Amso, D., & Slemmer, J. A. (2003). Development of object concepts in infancy: Evidence for early learning in an eye-tracking paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 10568-10573.
22. Johnson, S. P., Bremner, J. G., Slater, A., Mason, U., Foster, K., & Cheshire, A. (2003). Infants' perception of object trajectories. Child Development, 74, 94-108.
23. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
24. Jonsson, B., & von Hofsten, C. (2003). Infants' ability to track and reach for temporarily occluded objects. Developmental Science, 6, 88-99.
25. Kaplan, G. A. (1969). Kinetic disruption of optical texture: The perception of depth at an edge. Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 193-198.
26. Kaufman, J., Csibra, G., & Johnson, M. H. (2003). Representing occluded objects in the human infant brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, S140-S143.
27. Kaufman, J., Csibra, G., & Johnson, M. H. (2005). Oscillatory activity in the infant brain reflects object maintenance. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 102, 15271-15274.
28. Kaufmann-Hayoz, R., Kaufmann, F., & Stucki, M. (1986). Kinetic contours in infants' visual perception. Child Development, 57, 292-299.
29. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30. Michotte, A. (1950). A propos de la permanence phénoménale: Faits et theories [Concerning phenomenal permanence: Facts and theories]. Acta Psychologica, 7, 293-322.
31. Michotte, A., Thinès, G., & Crabbé, G. (1991). Amodal completion of perceptual structures (T. R. Miles & E. Miles, Trans.). In G. Thinès, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Original work published 1964)
32. Moore, M. K., Borton, R., & Darby, B. L. (1978). Visual tracking in young infants: Evidence for object identity or object permanence? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 183-198.
33. Munakata, Y. (2001). Graded representations in behavioral dissociations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 309-315.
34. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1937)
35. Ramachandran, V., & Anstis, S. M. (1983). Extrapolation of motion path in human visual perception. Vision Research, 23, 83-85.
36. Rosander, K., & von Hofsten, C. (2004). Infants' emerging ability to represent occluded object motion. Cognition, 91, 1-22.
37. Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items though occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.
38. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
39. Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301-305.
40. Spelke, E. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1230-1243.
41. Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605-632.
42. Spelke, E. S., Kestenbaum, R., Simons, D. J., & Wein, D. (1995). Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 113-142.
43. van der Meer, A. L. H., van der Weel, F. R., & Lee, D. N. (1994). Prospective control in catching by infants. Perception, 23, 287-302.
44. von Hofsten, C., Feng, Q., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Object representation and predictive action in infancy. Developmental Science, 3, 193-205.
45. Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111-153.