Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space: A corrigendum

Econometrica

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 591-600

  Dekel, Eddie ^a,b   Lipman, Barton L ^c   Rustichini, Aldo ^d   Sarver, Todd ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c Boston University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Expected utility; Preference for commitment; Preference for flexibility; Subjective state space

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847400986     PISSN: 00129682     EISSN: 14680262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00759.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. DEKEL, E., B. LIPMAN, AND A. RUSTICHINI (2001): "Representing Preferences with a Unique Subjective State Space," Econometrica, 69, 891-934. [591]
2. _ (2006): "Temptation-Driven Preferences," Working Paper, Boston University. [596]
3. DEKEL, E., B. L. LIPMAN, A. RUSTICHINI, AND T. SARVER (2007): "Supplement to 'Representing Preferences with a Unique Subjective State Space: Corrigendum,'" Econometrica Supplementary Material, 75, http://econometricsociety.org/ecta/supmat/6232errata.pdf. [591]
4. GUI., F., AND W. PESENDORFER (2001): "Temptation and Self-Control," Econometrica, 69, 1403-1435. [597]
5. SARVER, T. (2006): "Anticipating Regret: Why Fewer Options May Be Better," Working Paper, Northwestern University. [596]
6. SCHNEIDER, R. (1993): Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowskl Theory. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. [594]