Engagement and satisfaction with an Internet-based physical activity intervention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 545-552

  van den Berg, M H ^c   Ronday, H K ^a   Peeters, A J ^b   Voogt van der Harst, E M ^c   Munneke, M ^d   Breedveld, F C ^c   Vliet Vlieland, T P M ^c  

^a HAGA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Exercise; Internet; Participation; Physical activity; Rheumatoid arthritis; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

DISEASE MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUG; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALIZATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; ONLINE SYSTEM; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGISTER; REGISTRATION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RHEUMATOLOGY; TELEPHONE;

ADULT; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; COMMUNICATION; ELECTRONIC MAIL; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CARE; TELEPHONE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33847400126     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: 14620332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel341     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Van den Ende CH, Breedveld FC, le Cessie S et al. Effect of intensive exercise on patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:615-21.
2. De Jong Z, Munneke M, Zwinderman AH et al. Is a long-term high-intensity exercise program effective and safe in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2415-24.
3. Fontaine KR, Heo M, Bathon J. Are US adults with arthritis meeting public health recommendations for physical activity? Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:624-8.
4. Eurenius E, Stenstrom CH. Physical activity, physical fitness, and general health perception among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53:48-55.
5. Chorus A, Hopman-Rock M. [Patients with chronic diseases and physical activity: A quick scan] (in Dutch). Leiden: TNO Preventie en Gezondheid, Divisie Bewegen en Gezondheid, 2003.
6. Work group recommendations: 2002 Exercise and Physical Activity Conference, St Louis, Missouri. Session VI: Population approaches to health promotion and disability prevention through physical activity. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:477.
7. Chang R, Roubenoff R, Mayer J, Brandt KD, Schanberg LE. Work Group recommendations: 2002 Exercise and Physical Activity Conference, St Louis, Missouri. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:280.
8. Van den Berg MH, Ronday HK, Peeters AJ et al. Using Internet technology to deliver a home-based physical activity intervention for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res 2006 (in press).
9. Marshall AL, Leslie ER, Bauman AE, Marcus BH, Owen N. Print versus website physical activity programs: A randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:88-94.
10. Napolitano MA, Fotheringham M, Tate D et al. Evaluation of an Internet-based physical activity intervention: A preliminary investigation. Ann Behav Med 2003;25:92-9.
11. McKay HG, King D, Eakin EG, Seeley JR, Glasgow RE. The diabetes network internet-based physical activity intervention: A randomized pilot study. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1328-34.
12. Slootmaker SM, Chin APM, Schuit AJ, Seidell JC, Van Mechelen W. Promoting physical activity using an activity monitor and a tailored web-based advice: Design of a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN93896459]. BMC Public Health 2005;5:134.
13. Hageman PA, Walker SN, Pullen CH. Tailored versus standard Internet-delivered interventions to promote physical activity in older women. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2005;28:28-33.
14. Rydell SA, French SA, Fulkerson JA et al. Use of a web-based component of a nutrition and physical activity behavioral intervention with Girl Scouts. J Am Diet Assoc 2005;105:1447-50.
15. Leslie E, Marshall AL, Owen N, Bauman A. Engagement and retention of participants in a physical activity website. Prev Med 2005;40:54-9.
16. Sciamanna CN, Lewis B, Tate D et al. User attitudes toward a physical activity promotion website. Prev Med 2002;35:612-5.
17. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315-24.
18. Ooijdendijk W, Hildebrandt V, Stiggelbout M. Trend Report Physical Activity and Health 2000/2001 (in Dutch). Heerhugowaard: PlantijnCasparie, 2002;7-23.
19. Stenstrom CH, Arge B, Sundbom A. Home exercise and compliance in inflammatory rheumatic diseases-a prospective clinical trial. J Rheumatol 1997;24:470-6.
20. Baum EE, Jarjoura D, Polen AE, Faur D, Rutecki G. Effectiveness of a group exercise program in a long-term care facility: A randomized pilot trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4:74-80.
21. Wilbur J, Michaels MA, Chandler P, McDevitt J. Determinants of physical activity and adherence to a 24-week home-based walking program in African American and Caucasian women. Res Nurs Health 2003;26:213-24.
22. Avery MD, Leon AS, Kopher RA. Effects of a partially home-based exercise program for women with gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:10-5.
23. Borg G. Subjective effort and physical abilities. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1978;6:105-13.
24. Riemsma RP, Taal E, Rasker JJ et al. Evaluation of a Dutch version of the AIMS2 for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:755-60.
25. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137-45.
26. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW et al. The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire - an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987;14:446-51.
27. De Jong Z, van Der HD, McKenna SP, Whalley D. The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: A rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality of life instrument. Br J Rheumatol 1997;36:878-83.
28. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993;2:217-27.
29. Ooijendijk W, Hildebrandt V, Stiggelbout M, Hopman-Rock M. Trend Report Physical Activity and Health 2002/2003 (in Dutch). Amsterdam: PlantijnCasparie, 2002.
30. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: Dimensions and Practical Applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:20.
31. Ferney SL, Marshall AL. Website physical activity interventions: preferences of potential users. Health Educ Res 2006;21:560-6.
32. Doshi A, Patrick K, Sallis JF, Calfas K. Evaluation of physical activity web sites for use of behavior change theories. Ann Behav Med 2003;25:105-11.
33. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 2003;27(Suppl 3):S227-32.
34. Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM et al. Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med 1998;20:174-80.
35. Chinn DJ, White M, Howel D, Harland JO, Drinkwater CK. Factors associated with non-participation in a physical activity promotion trial. Public Health 2006;120:309-19.
36. Oldham J. Telephone use in primary care. Programme to shape demand has been started in several practices. Br Med J 2002;325:547.
37. Bergmo TS, Kummervold PE, Gammon D, Dahl LB. Electronic patient-provider communication: Will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care? Int J Med Inform 2005;74:705-10.
38. Pal B. Following up outpatients by telephone: Pilot study. BMJ 1998;316:1647.
39. Rosen P, Spangler J, Scrabis N, Bouwers S, Kwoh K. Patient-physician email use in a pediatric rheumatology practice. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52(9 suppl):S415-6.