Taking the plunge: A contextual approach to problem-based research

Communication Monographs

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 106-111

  Tracy, Sarah J ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Grounded Research; Interpretive Analyses; Power; Problem; Qualitative Methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847397054     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: 14795787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03637750701196862     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Corman, S. (2006). On being less theoretical and more technological in organizational communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20, 325-338.
2. Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248-272.
3. Deetz, S. (1998). Discursive formations, strategized subordination, and self-surveillance: An empirical case. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management and organizational theory (pp. 151-172). London: Sage.
4. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (S. Sampson, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
6. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
7. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown.
8. Goodall, H. L., Jr. (2004). Narrative ethnography as applied communication research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 185-194.
9. Hallier, J., & Foirbes, T. (2004). In search of theory development in grounded investigations: Doctors' experiences of managing as an example of fitted and prospective theorizing. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1379-1410.
10. Jones, E., Watson, B., Gardner, J., & Gallois, C. (2004). Organizational communication: Challenges for the new century. Journal of Communication, 54, 722-750.
11. Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
13. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Mumby, D. K. (1997). The problem of hegemony: Rereading Gramsci for organizational communication studies. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 343-375.
15. Stokes, D. (1999). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16. Tracy, S. J. (2000). Becoming a character for commerce: Emotion labor, self subordination and discursive construction of identity in a total institution. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 90-128.
17. Tracy, S. J. (2005). Locking up emotion: Moving beyond dissonance for understanding emotion labor discomfort. Communication Monographs, 72, 261-283.
18. Tracy, S. J., Lutgen-Sandvik, P., & Alberts, J. K. (2006). Nightmares, demons and slaves: Exploring the painful metaphors of workplace bullying. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 148-185.
19. Tracy, S. J., & Tracy, K. (1998). Emotion labor at 911: A case study and theoretical critique. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 390-411.