What is the taxonomic status of the Cambodian banteng and does it have close genetic links with the kouprey?

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 271, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 246-252

  Hassanin, Alexandre ^a   Ropiquet, A ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Banteng; Bos javanicus; Bos sauveli; Bovidae; Bovini; Cambodia; Hybridization; Introgression; Kouprey

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; HYBRIDIZATION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RUMINANT; TAXONOMY;

ASIA; EURASIA; LAOS; MYANMAR; SOUTHEAST ASIA; THAILAND; VIET NAM;

ANIMALIA; BOS GAURUS; BOS INDICUS; BOS JAVANICUS; BOS SAUVELI; BOVIDAE; BOVINI;

EID: 33847387704     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: 14697998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00272.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ballard, J.W. & Whitlock, M.C. (2004). The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13, 729-744.
2. Bohlken, H. (1958). Vergleichende untersuchungen an wildrindern (Tribus Bovini Simpson, 1945). Zoologische Jahrbücher 68, 113-202.
3. Bohlken, H. (1961). Der Kouprey, Bos (Bibos) sauveli Urbain 1937. Zeitschrift saügetierkunde 26, 193-254.
4. Byers, O., Hedges, S. & Seal, U.S. (1995). Asian wild cattle conservation assessment and management plan workshop. Working document. Apple Valley, MN: IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group.
5. Cheminaud, G. (1939). Mes Chasses au Laos. Paris: Payot.
6. Coolidge, H.J. (1940). The Indo-Chinese forest ox or kouprey. Mem. Mus. Compar. Zool., Harvard 54, 421-531.
7. Edmond-Blanc, F. (1947). A contribution of the knowledge of the Cambodian wild ox or kouproh. J. Mammal. 28, 245-248.
8. Forsdyke, D.R. (2000). Haldane's rule: hybrid sterility affects the heterogametic sex first because sexual differentiation is on the path to species differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 204, 443-452.
9. Galbreath, G.J., Mordacq, J.C. & Weiler, F.H. (2006). Genetically solving a zoological mystery: was the kouprey (Bos sauveli) a feral hybrid? J. Zool. (Lond.) 270, 561-564.
10. Geraads, D. (1992). Phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Bovini (Mammalia: Artiodactyla). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 104, 193-207.
11. Gray, A. (1972). Mammalian hybrids. A check-list with bibliography. Bucks, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux Farnham Royal.
12. Groves, C.P. (1981). Systematic relationships in the Bovini (Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 19, 264-278.
13. Halbert, N.D., Ward, T.J., Schnabel, R.D., Taylor, J.F. & Derr, J.N. (2005). Conservation genomics: disequilibrium mapping of domestic cattle chromosomal segments in North American bison populations. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2343-2362.
14. Hassanin, A. & Douzery, E. (1999). The tribal radiation of the family Bovidae (Artiodactyla) and the evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 227-243.
15. Hassanin, A., Lecointre, G. & Tillier, S. (1998a). The 'evolutionary signal' of homoplasy in protein-coding gene sequences and its phylogenetic consequences for weighting in phylogeny. C. R. Acad. Sci. III 321, 611-620.
16. Hassanin, A., Pasquet, E. & Vigne, J.D. (1998b). Molecular systematics of the subfamily Caprinae (Artiodactyla, Bovidae) as determined from cytochrome b sequences. J. Mammal. Evol. 5, 217-236.
17. Hassanin, A. & Ropiquet, A. (2004). Molecular phylogeny of the tribe Bovini (Bovidae, Bovinae) and the taxonomic status of the kouprey, Bos sauveli Urbain 1937. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33, 896-907.
18. Hassanin, A., Ropiquet, A., Cornette, R., Tranier, M., Pfeffer, P., Candegabe, P. & Lemaire, M. (2006). Has the kouprey (Bos sauveli Urbain, 1937) been domesticated in Cambodia? C. R. Biol. 329, 124-135.
19. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. (2001). MrBayes: bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755.
20. Janecek, L.L., Honeycutt, R.L., Adkins, R.M. & Davis, S.K. (1996). Mitochondrial gene sequences and the molecular systematics of the artiodactyl subfamily Bovinae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6, 107-119.
21. Kikkawa, Y., Takada, T., Nomura, K., Namikawa, T., Yonekawa, H. & Amano, T. (2003). Phylogenies using mtDNA and SRY provide evidence for male-mediated introgression in Asian domestic cattle. Anim. Genet. 34, 96-101.
22. Loftus, R.T., MacHugh, D.E., Bradley, D.G., Sharp, P.M. & Cunningham, P. (1994). Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2757-2761.
23. MacHugh, D.E., Shriver, M.D., Loftus, R.T., Cunningham, P. & Bradley, D.G. (1997). Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics 146, 1071-1086.
24. MacKinnon, J.R. & Stuart, S.N. (1988). The kouprey: an action plan for its conservation. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Asian Wild Cattle Specialist Group.
25. Martojo, H. (2003). Indigenous bali cattle: the best suited cattle breed for sustainable small farms in Indonesia. In The relationship between indigenous animals and humans in the APEC: 21-35. Chang, H.-L. & Huang, Y.-C. (Eds), The Chinese Society of Animal Science, Taipei, Taiwan.
26. Nijman, I.J., Otsen, M., Verkaar, E.L.C., Ruijter, C., de Hanekamp, E., Ochieng, J.W., Shamshad, S., Rege, J.E.O., Hanotte, O., Barwegen, M.W., Sulawati, T. & Lenstra, J.A. (2003). Hybridization of banteng (Bos javanicus) and zebu (Bos indicus) revealed by mitochondrial DNA, satellite DNA, AFLP and microsatellites. Heredity 90, 10-16.
27. Nylander, J.A.A. (2004). MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
28. Pfeffer, P. (1969). Considérations sur l'écologie des forêts claires du Cambodge oriental. Terre et Vie 1, 3-24.
29. Pfeffer, P. & Kim-San, O. (1967). Le kouprey, Bos (Bibos) sauveli Urbain, 1937; Discussion systématique et statut actuel. Hypothèse sur l'origine du zébu (Bos indicus). Mammalia 31, 521-536.
30. Ropiquet, A. & Hassanin, A. (2006). Hybrid origin of the Pliocene ancestor of wild goats. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 41, 395-404.
31. Sauvel, R. (1949). Distribution géographique du Kou-Prey (Bibos sauveli Urb.). Mammalia 13, 144-148.
32. Swofford, D.L. (1993). PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Champaign: Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey.
33. Swofford, D.L. (2003). PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
34. Tanaka, K., Solis, C.D., Masangkay, J.S., Maeda, K., Kawamoto, Y. & Namikawa, T. (1996). Phylogenetic relationship among all living species of the genus Bubalus based on DNA sequences of the cytochrome b gene. Biochem. Genet. 34, 443-452.
35. Troy, C.S., MacHugh, D.E., Bailey, J.F., Magee, D.A., Loftus, R.T., Cunningham, P., Chamberlain, A.T., Sykes, B.C. & Bradley, D.G. (2001). Genetic evidence for Near-Eastern origins of European cattle. Nature 410, 1088-1091.
36. Urbain, A. (1937). Le Kou Prey ou boeuf gris cambodgien. Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 62, 305-307.
37. Verkaar, E.L., Nijman, I.J., Beeke, M., Hanekamp, E. & Lenstra, J.A. (2004). Maternal and paternal lineages in cross-breeding bovine species. Has wisent a hybrid origin? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1165-1170.
38. Wharton, C.H. (1957). An ecological study of the kouprey, Novibos sauveli (Urbain). Monogr. Inst. Sci. Technol., Manila 5, 1-107.
39. Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.M. (2005). Mammal species of the world. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Winnepenninckx, B., Backeljau, T. & Dewachter, R. (1993). Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from molluscs. Trends Genet. 9, 407.