Graphical models for composable finite Markov processes

Scandinavian Journal of Statistics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 169-185

  Didelez, Vanessa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conditional independence; Counting processes; Granger causality; Local independence; Multistate models

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847373658     PISSN: 03036898     EISSN: 14679469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2006.00528.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aalen, O. O. (1987). Dynamic modelling and causality. Scand. Actuar. J. 177-190.
2. Aalen, O. O., Borgan, Ø., Keiding, N. & Thormann, J. (1980). Interaction between life history events: nonparametric analysis of prospective and retrospective data in the presence of censoring. Scand. J. Statist. 7, 161-171.
3. Andersen, P. K., Borgan, Ø., Gill, R. D. & Keiding, N. (1993). Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, New York.
4. Cowell, R. G., Dawid, A. P., Lauritzen, S. L. & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1999). Probabilistic networks and expert systems. Springer, New York.
5. Cox, D. R. & Wermuth, N. (1996). Multivariate depencencies - models, analysis and interpretation. Chapman and Hall, London.
6. Dawid, A. P. (1979). Conditional independence in statistical theory. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 41, 1-31.
7. Didelez, V. (2000). Graphical models for event history data based on local independence. Logos, Berlin.
8. Didelez, V. (2005). Graphical models for marked point processes based on local independence. Technical Report 258, University College London, London.
9. Didelez, V. (2006). Asymmetric separation for local independence graphs. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 130-137. AUAI Press, Corvallis, Dregom.
10. Edwards, D. (2000). Introduction to graphical modelling, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
11. Eichler, M. (1999). Graphical models in time series analysis. PhD thesis, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
12. Eichler, M. (2000). Causality graphs for stationary time series. Technical report, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
13. Florens, J. P. & Fougère, D. (1996). Noncausality in continuous time. Econometrica 64, 1195-1212.
14. Frydenberg, M. (1990). The chain graph Markov property. Scand. J. Statist. 17, 333-353.
15. Gottard, A. (2002). Graphical duration models. Technical Report 2002/07, University of Florence, Florence.
16. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37, 424-438.
17. Hoem, J. M. (1969). Purged and partial Markov chains. Skand. Aktuar. Tidskr. 147-155.
18. Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
19. Nodelman, U., Shelton, C. R. & Koller, D. (2002). Continuous time Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 378-387. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA. Available at: http://www.auai.org/ (accessed July 18, 2006).
20. Nodelman, U., Shelton, C. R. & Koller, D. (2003). Learning continuous time Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 451-458. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA. Available at: http://www.auai.org/ (accessed July 18, 2006).
21. Pearl, J. & Paz, A. (1987). Graphoids: a graph-based logic for reasoning about relevancy relations. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence-II, (eds B. Du Boulay, D. Hogg, & L. Steel) 357-363. North Holland, Amsterdam.
22. Schweder, T. (1970). Composable Markov processes. J. Appl. Probab. 7, 400-410.
23. Wermuth, N. & Lauritzen, S. L. (1990). On substantive research hypotheses, conditional independence graphs and graphical chain models (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 52, 21-72.
24. Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. Wiley, Chichester.