Asymmetric separation for local independence graphs

Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 130-137

  Didelez, Vanessa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS TIME; CYCLIC GRAPH; DYNAMIC DEPENDENCY; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; INDEPENDENCE GRAPHS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; MARKOV PROCESSES;

SEPARATION;

EID: 33847375242     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Aalen, O.O. (1987). Dynamic modelling and causality. Scand. Actuar. J., 177-90.
2. Andersen, P.K., Borgan, Ø. Gill, R.D. & Keiding, N. (1993). Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, New York.
3. Cozman F.G. and Walley, P. (1999). Graphoid properties of epistemic irrelevance and independence. Technical Report, University of Sao Paolo.
4. Dawid, A.P. (1979). Conditional independence in statistical theory. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 41, 1-31.
5. Dawid, A.P. (1980). Conditional independence for statistical operations. The Annals of Statistics, 8, 598-617.
6. Dawid, A.P. (2001). Separoids: A mathematical framework for conditional independence and irrele- vance. Ann. Math. Artificial Intelligence, 32, 335-72.
7. Didelez, V. (2000). Graphical models for event history data based on local independence. Logos, Berlin.
8. Didelez, V. (2005a). Graphical models for marked point processes based on local independence. Tech. Rep. No. 258, University College London.
9. Didelez, V. (2005b). Graphical models for composable finite Markov processes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, to appear.
10. Eichler, M. (2002). Granger-causality and path diagrams for multivariate time series. Journal of Econometrics, to appear.
11. Galles, D. and Pearl, J. (1996). Axioms of causal relevance. Technical Report 240, University of California, Los Angeles.
12. Granger, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37, 424-38.
13. Lauritzen, S.L. (1996). Graphical models. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
14. Nodelman, U., Shelton, C. R. & Koller, D. (2002). Continuous time Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 378-87.
15. Nodelman, U., Shelton, C. R. & Koller, D. (2003). Learning continuous time Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 451-8.
16. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
17. Pearl, J., Dechter, R. (1996). Identifying independencies in causal graphs with feedback. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 240-6.
18. Pearl, J. & Paz, A. (1987). Graphoids: A graph- based logic for reasoning about relevancy relations. In B. Du Boulay, D. Hogg, & L. Steel (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Intelligence - II, pp. 357-63.
19. Schweder, T. (1970). Composable Markov processes. J. Appl. Prob. 7, 400-10.
20. Spirtes, P. (1995). Directed cyclic graphical representations of feedback models. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 491-8.
21. Verma, T. & Pearl, J. (1988). Causal networks: Semantics and expressiveness. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 69-76.