Evaluation of computerized interpretation of the pediatric electrocardiogram

Journal of Electrocardiology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 139-143

  Chiu, Christine C ^a   Hamilton, Robert M ^a   Gow, Robert M ^b   Kirsh, Joel A ^a   McCrindle, Brian W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer interpretation; Disagreement; ECG

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGIST; CHILD; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART DISEASE; HEART RIGHT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QT INTERVAL; QT PROLONGATION; SINUS ARRHYTHMIA; SINUS RHYTHM;

ADOLESCENT; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PEDIATRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33847350845     PISSN: 00220736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2006.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Schlant R., Adolph R., DiMarco J., et al. Guidelines for electrocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (committee on electrocardiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 19 (1992) 473
2. Willems J., Abreu-Lima C., Arnaud P., et al. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. N Engl J Med 325 (1991) 1767
3. de Bruyne M., Kors J., Hoes A., et al. Diagnostic interpretation of electrocardiograms in population-based research: computer program, research physicians or cardiologists?. J Clin Epidemiol 50 (1997) 947
4. Guglin M., and Thatai D. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation. Int J Cardiol 106 (2005) 232
5. Davison A., and Hinkley D. Bootstrap methods and their application (1997), Cambridge University Press, New York (NY)
6. Hosmer D., and Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. (2000), John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York (NY)
7. Lloyd C. Statistical analysis of categorical data (1999), John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York (NY)
8. Dwyer A. Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities. Radiology 178 (1991) 328
9. Kshetrapal S., and Silber E. Accuracy of computerized electrocardiographic interpretation (Presentation). American College of Cardiology 40th annual scientific session (March 1991)
10. RuDusky B. Errors of computer electrocardiography. Angiology 48 (1997) 1045
11. Snyder C., Fenrich A., Friedman R., et al. The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?. Pediatr Cardiol 24 (2003) 364
12. Swartz M., and Teichholz L. Marquette 12SL ECG analysis program: evaluation of physician changes. Comput Cardiol (1982) 437
13. 12SL ECG analysis MAC Rhythm Program: physician's Guide. Revision A. GE Marquette Medical Systems, Inc., 2000.
14. Davignon A., Rautaharju P., Boisselle E., et al. Normal ECG standards for infants and children. Ped Cardiol 80 (1979) 123
15. Rijnbeek P., Witsenburg M., Schrama E., et al. New normal limits for paediatric electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J 22 (2001) 702
16. Salemo S., Alguire P., and Waxman H. Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence. Ann Intern Med 38 (2003) 751
17. Sackett D. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis 32 (1979) 51