Errors of computer electrocardiography

Angiology

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1045-1050

  RuDusky, Basil M ^a  

^a NE Cardiovasc Clin and Res Inst ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; HEART REPOLARIZATION; HUMAN; RELIABILITY; T WAVE;

EID: 0030662389     PISSN: 00033197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000331979704801204     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Sridharan M, Flowers N: Computerized electrocardiographic analysis. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 53:37-41, 1984.
2. Mulcahy D, Reardon R, Mulcahy R, et al: Can a computer-assisted electrocardiograph replace a cardiologist for ECG measurements? Irish J Med Sci 155:410-414, 1986.
3. Drazen E: Computer-assisted ECG interpretation for physicians' offices. Cardiology 1:15-25, 1972.
4. Sheffield L: Computer-aided electrocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 10:448-455, 1987.
5. Lobodzinski S, Laks M: Present and future concepts in computerized electrocardiography. Intern Med Spec 8:152-192, 1987.
6. Snoey E, Housset B, Guyon P, et al: Analysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms. J Accident Emerg Med 11:149-153, 1994.
7. Ho M, Kudenchuk P, Eisenberg M, et al: Patient selection for thrombolytic therapy: Emergency physicians versus electrocardiographer (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 15:192A, 1990.
8. Kuhn M, Morgan M, Hoffman J: Quality assurance in the emergency department: Evaluation of the ECG review process. Ann Emerg Med 21:10-15, 1992.
9. Kshetrapal S, Silber E: Accuracy of computerized electrocardiographic interpretation (Presentation). American College of Cardiology 40th annual scientific session, March 1991.
10. Friedman A, Girdhar R, Chough S, et al: Comparison of computer versus cardiologist analysis of electrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:126A, 1992.
11. Willems J, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, et al: The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. N Engl J Med 325:1767-1773, 1991.
12. Mulcahy D, Mulcahy R, Reardon B, et al: Can a computer diagnosis of "normal ECG" be trusted? Irish J Med Sci 155:416-418, 1986.
13. Willems J, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud J, et al: Effect of combining electrocardiographic interpretation results on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 10:211-218, 1989.
14. Hagen A, Alpert J, Nave M, et al: Clinical evaluation of five programs for computerized ECG interpretation. Circulation 51:762 (Abstract), 1975.
15. Phibbs B, Marriott H: Computerized ECG interpretation (letter). Primary Cardiol 19:12-142, 1983.
16. Blake T: EKG computers: A public health hazard. South Med J 76:696-698, 1983.