The tilt aftereffect in plaids and gratings: Channel codes, local signs and "patchwise" transforms

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1421-1437

  Meese, T S ^a,b   Georgeson, M A ^a,c  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gratings; Human vision; Local signs; Local transforms; Plaids; Psychophysics; Tilt aftereffect

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FILTER; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; VISION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION;

EID: 0029867649     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00212-X     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bennett, P. J. (1993). The harmonic bandwidth of phase-reversal discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 292-304.
2. Blakemore, C. & Sutton, P. (1969). Size adaptation: A new aftereffect. Science, 166, 245-247.
3. Bonds, A. B. (1991). Temporal dynamics of contrast gain in single cells of the cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 2, 41-55.
4. Braddick, O., Campbell, F. W. & Atkinson, J. (1978). Channels in vision: Basic aspects. In Held, R., Leibowitz, H. H. & Teuber, H. (Eds), Handbook of sensory physiology: Perception. Berlin: Springer.
5. Campbell, F. W. & Maffei, L. (1971). The tilt after-effect: A fresh look. Vision Research, 11, 833-840.
6. Chino, Y. M., Kas, J. H., Smith, E. L. Langston, A. L. & Cheng, H. (1992). Rapid reorganisation of cortical maps in adult cats following restricted deafferentation in retina. Vision Research, 32, 789-796.
7. Coltheart, M. (1971). Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. Psychological Review, 78, 114-121.
8. Daugman, J. G. (1985). Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 1160-1169.
9. De Valois, R. L. and De Valois, K. K. (1988). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Farge, M., Hunt, J. C. R. & Vassilicos, J. C. (1994). Wavelets, fractals, and Fourier transforms. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 2379-2394.
12. Field, D. J. (1989). What the statistics of natural images tell us about visual coding. SPIE, Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display, 1077, 269-276.
13. Georgeson, M. A. (1979). Spatial Fourier analysis and human vision. In Sutherland, N. S. (Ed.), Tutorial essays in psychology (Vol. 2, Chap. 2, pp. 39-88). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
14. Georgeson, M. A. (1985). The effect of spatial adaptation on perceived contrast. Spatial Vision, 1, 103-112.
15. Georgeson, M. A. (1990). Human vision combines oriented filters to compute edges. Perception, 19, 354 (Abstr.).
16. Georgeson, M. A. (1992). Human vision combines oriented filters to compute edges. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 249, 235-245.
17. Georgeson M. A. (1994). From filters to features: location, orientation, contrast and blur. In G. R. Bock & J. A. Goode (Eds) Higher order processing in the visual system, Wiley: Chichester, pp 147-165.
18. Georgeson M. A. (1996). Edge-finding in human vision: A model based on the perceived structure of plaids. Image & Vision Computing (submitted).
19. Georgeson, M. A. & Meese, T. S. (1996). Perceived structure of plaids implies variable combination of oriental filters in edge finding. Proc. SPIE, 2657, In press.
20. Gibson J. J. & Radner M. (1937). Adaptation, aftereffect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 453-467.
21. Gilbert, C. D. (1995). Dynamic properties of adult visual cortex. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (Chap. 5). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Gilbert, C. D. & Wiesel, T. N. (1992). Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex. Nature, 356, 150-152.
23. Greenlee, M. W., Georgeson, M. A., Magnussen, S. & Harris, J. P. (1991). The time-course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Vision Research, 31, 223-236.
24. Harris, J. P. & Calvert, J. E. (1985). The tilt after-effect: Changes with stimulus size and eccentricity. Spatial Vision, 1, 113-129.
25. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. (1974). Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter and magnification factor. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 158, 295-306.
26. Jones, R. M. & Tulunay-Keesey, U. (1980). Phase selectivity of spatial frequency channels. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 70, 66-70.
27. Kulikowski, J. J., Marcelja, A. S. & Bishop, P. O. (1982). Theory of spatial position and spatial frequency relations in the receptive fields of simple cells in the visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 187-198.
28. Landy, M. S., Cohen, Y. & Sperling, G. (1984). HIPS: A Unix-based image processing system. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 25, 331-347.
29. Malik, J. & Perona, P. (1992). Finding boundaries in images. In Wechsler, H. (Ed.), Neural networks for perception, Vol. I: Human and machine perception (pp. 315-344). New York: Academic Press.
30. Marr, D. & Hildreth, E. (1980). Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 207, 187-217.
31. Martens, J-B. (1990). Deblurring digital images by means of polynomial transforms. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 50, 157-176.
32. Mather, G. (1980). The movement aftereffect and a distribution shift model of direction coding. Perception, 9, 379-392.
33. Meese, T. S. (1993). A quantitative model of the tilt aftereffect: Slow acting recalibration can account for the residual aftereffect. Proceedings of the Society for the Promotion of the Visual Sciences, Cardiff (p. 17).
34. Meese, T. S. (1995a). Phase-reversal discrimination in one and two dimensions: Performance is limited by spatial repetition, not spatial frequency content. Vision Research, 35, 2157-2167.
35. Meese, T. S. (1995b). Using the standard staircase to measure the point of subjective equality: A guide based on computer simulations. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 267-281.
36. Meese, T. S. & Freeman, T. C. A. (1995). Edge computation in human vision: Anisotropy in the combining of oriented filters. Perception, 24, 603-622.
37. Meese, T. S. & Georgeson, M. A. (1991). Edge computation in human vision: what controls the combining of oriented filters? Perception, 20, 113.
38. Meese, T. S. & Georgeson, M. A. (1992). Perceived structure of 3-component plaids: Combining and sharing of oriented filter outputs. Perception, 21 (Suppl. 2), 91-92.
39. Meese, T. S. & Georgeson, M. A. (1996). Spatial filter combination in human pattern vision: Channel interactions across spatial frequency and orientation revealed by adaptation. Perception, Submitted.
40. Morgan M. J., Ross, J. & Hayes, A. (1991). The relative importance of local phase and local amplitude in patchwise image reconstruction. Biological Cybernetics, 65, 113-119.
41. Morrone, M. C. & Burr, D. C. (1988). Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 235, 221-245.
42. Nasanen, R., Kukkonen, H. & Rovamo, J. (1994). Relationship between spatial integration and spatial spread of contrast energy in detection. Vision Research, 34, 949-954.
43. Olzak, L. A. & Thomas, J. P. (1991). When orthogonal orientations are not processed independently. Vision Research, 31, 51-57.
44. Olzak, L. A. & Thomas, J. P. (1992). Configurai effects constrain Fourier models of pattern discrimination. Vision Research, 32, 1885-1898.
45. Pelli, D. G. (1990). The quantum efficiency of vision. In Blakemore, C. (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 3-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Regan, D. & Beverley, K. I. (1985). Postadaptation orientation discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 147-155.
47. Robson, J. G. (1975). Receptive fields: Neural representation of the spatial and intensive attributes of the visual image. In Carterette, E. C. & Friedman, M. P. (Eds), Handbook of perception, Vol. V: "Seeing" (Chap. 4). New York: Academic Press.
48. Robson, J. G. (1983). Frequency domain visual processing. In Braddick, O. J. & Sleigh, A. C. (Eds), Physical and biological processing of images. Berlin: Springer.
49. Sakitt, B. & Barlow, H. B. (1982). A model for the economical encoding of the visual image in cerebral cortex. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 97-108.
50. Wang, H. & Levi, D. M. (1994). Spatial integration in position acuity. Vision Research, 34, 2859-2877.
51. Ware, C. & Mitchell, D. E. (1974). The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect. Vision Research, 14, 735-737.
52. Watson, A. B. (1987). The cortex transform: Rapid computation of simulated neural images. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 39, 311-327.
53. Watson, A. B. (1990). Perceptual components architecture for digital video. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7, 1943-1954.
54. Watson, A. B., Barlow, H. B. & Robson, J. G. (1983). What does the eye see best? Nature, 302, 419-422.
55. Wilson, H. R. & Humanski, R. (1993). Spatial frequency adaptation and contrast gain control. Vision Research, 33, 1133-1149.
56. Wolfe, J. M. & O'Connell, K. M. (1986). Fatigue and structural change: Two consequences of visual pattern adaptation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 27, 538-543.
57. Young, R. A. (1987). The Gaussian derivative model for spatial vision: I. Retinal mechanisms. Spatial Vision, 2, 273-293.