Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in Indian chicken populations

Journal of Poultry Science

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 19-28

  Pirany, Nasrollah ^a   Romanov, Michael N ^b   Ganpule, Suhash P ^c   Devegowda, Govindaiah ^d   Prasad, Doddananjappa T ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ   (Iran)

^b ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c Pioneer Group   (India)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Chicken; Genetic distance; Genetic diversity; India; Microsatellite markers

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847327847     PISSN: 13467395     EISSN: 13490486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.44.19     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barton NF. Breeding meat type poultry for the future : targets for selection, limits to performance and market requirements for chicken. In : Proceedings of the 9th European Poultry Conference, Vol. I. pp. 33-38. The United Kingdom Branch of the WPSA. Glasgow. 1994.
2. Callen DF, Thompson AD, Shen Y, Phillips HA, Richards RI, Mulley JC and Sutherland GR. Incidence and origin of "null" alleles in the (AC)n microsatellite markers. American Journal of Human Genetics, 52 : 922-927. 1993.
3. Crooijmans RPMA, Groen AF, van Kampen AJA, van der Beek S, van der Poel JJ and Groenen MAM. Microsatellite polymorphism in commercial broiler and layer lines estimated using pooled blood samples. Poultry Science, 75 : 904-909. 1996.
4. Excoffier L, Smouse PM and Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes : application of human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131 : 479-491. 1992.
5. FAO. 1999. The Global Strategy for the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources. Executive Brief. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome (available online at http://dad.fao.org/en/refer/library/idad/ex- brf.pdf).
6. Flock DK. Targets for selection, limits to performance and market requirements for chicken : Eggs. In : Proceedings of the 9th European Poultry Conference. The United Kingdom Branch of the WPSA. Glasgow. Vol. 1. pp. 27-32. 1994.
7. Goudet J. FSTAT version 1.2 : a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86 : 485-486. 1995.
8. Guo S and Thompson E. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics, 48 : 361-372. 1992.
9. Hillel J, Groenen MAM, Tixier-Boichard M, Korol AB, David L, Kirzhner VM, Burke T, Barre-Dirie A, Crooijmans RPMA, Elo K, Feldman MW, Freidlin PJ, Mäki-Tanila A, Ortwijn M, Thomson P, Vignal A, Wimmers K and Weigend S. Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genetics Selection Evolution, 35 : 533-557. 2003.
10. Hutt FB. Genetics of the Fowl. McGraw-Hill. New York. 1949.
11. Kumar S, Singh RK, Dhara AK, Rahwat AK and Johari DC. Isoschizomeric restriction profiles of Indian fowl genome. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 32 : 119-121. 1997.
12. Kumar S, Kumar KG and Singh D. Evaluation of generic biodiversity in White Leghorn chicken lines using RAPD-PCR. In : XXI World's Poultry Congress : Abstracts and Proceedings, CD-ROM. WPSA. Montreal. 2000.
13. Langella O. Populations 1.2.28 (12/5/2002), CNRS UPR 9034. Laboratoire Population Génétique et Evolution, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). Gif-sur-Yvette. 1999.
14. Latter BDH. Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. III. Genetic divergence with centripetal selection and mutation. Genetics, 70 : 475-490. 1972.
15. Loknath GR and Murthy HNN. Breeding birds for field and scavenging conditions. In : Proceedings of the 2nd National Seminar on Rural Poultry for Adverse Environment. University of Agricultural Sciences. Bangalore. pp. 42-46. 2002.
16. Louis E and Dempster E. An exact test for Hardy-Weinberg and multiple alleles. Biometrics, 43 : 805-811. 1987.
17. Nei M. Genetic distances between populations. American Naturalist, 106 : 283-292. 1972.
18. Nei M. Mathematical models of speciation and genetic distance. In : Population Genetics and Ecology (Karlin S and Nevo E eds.). Academic Press. New York. pp. 723-765. 1976.
19. Nevo E. Genetic variation in natural populations : patterns and theory. Theoretical Population Biology, 13 : 121-177. 1978.
20. Page RDM. TreeView : An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 12 : 357-358. 1996.
21. Pandey AK, Mishra B, Chaudhary P, Tantia MS and Jijh RK. Microsatellite analysis in three breeds of Indian poultry. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 73 : 788-792. 2003.
22. Peakall R and Smouse PE. GenAlEx V5 : Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population Genetic Software for Teaching and Research. Australian National University. Canberra. 2001.
23. Ramappa BS. Giriraja - miracle fowl for rural poor. Published online by India Veterinary Community. com. 2003.
24. Raymond M and Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2) : population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86 : 248-249. 1995.
25. Romanov MN and Weigend S. Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers. Poultry Science, 80 : 1057-1063. 2001.
26. Rosenberg NA, Burke T, Feldman MW, Freidlin PJ, Groenen MAM, Hillel J, Mäki-Tanila A, Tixier-Boichard M, Vignal A, Wimmers K and Weigend S. Empirical evaluation of genetic clustering methods using multilocus genotypes from 20 chicken breeds. Genetics, 159 : 699-713. 2001.
27. Sapcota D, Islam R and Sheikh IU. Conserving poultry biodiversity in India. Livestock International, 6 : 21-23. 2002.
28. Shannon CE and Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press. Urbana. 1949.
29. Sharma D, Appa Rao KBC and Totey SM. Estimation of genetic diversity among various breeds of poultry using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. In : Proceedings of the 10th European Poultry Conference. WPSA. Jerusalem. Vol. I. pp. 259-262. 1998.
30. Sharma D, Appa Rao KBC and Rawat AK. Restriction enzyme analysis of satellite DNA components from poultry genome. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 69 : 711-714. 1999.
31. Singh RV and Sharma D. Within- and between-strain variability in White Leghorn population detected through RAPD markers. British Poultry Science, 43 : 33-37. 2002.
32. Takezaki N and Nei M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics, 144 : 389-399. 1996.
33. Tamada Y, Nishibori M, Yasue H and Wada Y. Polymorphism of mitochondrial D-loop region of Silkie fowls. In : Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Animal Genetics. International Society for Animal Genetics, Japanese Society of Animal Breeding and Genetics. Tokyo. p. 96. 2004.
34. van Marlé-Köster E and Nel LH. Genetic characterization of native Southern African chicken populations : evaluation and selection of polymorphic microsatellite markers. South African Journal of Animal Science, 30 : 1-6. 2000.
35. Vanhala T, Tuiskula-Haavisto M, Elo K, Vilkki J and Mäki-Tanila A. Evaluation of genetic variability and genetic distances between eight chicken lines using microsatellite markers. Poultry Science, 77 : 783-790. 1998.
36. Weigend S, Romanov MN, Ben-Ari G and Hillel J. Overview on the use of molecular markers to characterise genetic diversity in chickens. In : World's Poultry Congress and Exhibition. Participant List and Full Text CD. WPSA - Turkish Branch. Istanbul. 2004.
37. Weir BS. Genetic Data Analysis. Sinauer. Sunderland. 1990.
38. Weir BS and Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38 : 1358-1370. 1984.
39. Wimmers K, Ponsuksili S, Hardge T, Valle-Zarate A, Mathur PK and Horst P. Genetic distinctness of African, Asian and South American local chickens. Animal Genetics, 31 : 159-165. 2000.
40. Zhang X, Leung FC, Chan DKO, Chen Y and Wu C. Comparative analysis of allozyme, random amplified polymorphic DNA, and microsatellite polymorphism on Chinese native chickens. Poultry Science, 81 : 1093-1098. 2002.