Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers

Poultry Science

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 1057-1063

  Romanov, M N ^a,c   Weigend, S ^b  

^a Poultry Research Institute/UAAS   (Ukraine)

^b INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTICS   (Germany)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chicken; Genetic diversity; Jungle fowl; Microsatellite; Phylogenetic relationship

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CHICKEN; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GERMANY; PHYLOGENY; UKRAINE; WILD ANIMAL;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; ANIMALS, WILD; BREEDING; CHICKENS; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; GERMANY; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; UKRAINE; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0035432990     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.8.1057     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Archibald, A. L., J. Hu, C. Munhall, A. L. Hillyard, D. W. Burt, A. S. Law, and D. Nicholson, 1996. A generic single-species genome database. Anim. Genet. 27(Suppl. 2):55.
2. Argüello, J. F., A. M. Little, A. L. Pay, D. Gallardo, I. Rojas, S. G. E. Marsh, J. M. Goldman, and J. A. Madrigal, 1998. Mutation detection and typing polymorphic loci through double-strand conformation analysis. Nat. Genet. 18:192-194.
3. Barker, J. S. F., S. S. Moore, D. J. S. Hetzel, D. Evans, S. G. Tan, and K. Byrne, 1997. Genetic diversity of Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): Microsatellite variation and a comparison with protein-coding loci. Anim. Genet. 28:103-115.
4. Chu, J. Y., W. Huang, S. Q. Kuang, J. M. Wang, J. J. Xu, Z. T. Chu, Z. Q. Yang, K. Q. Lin, P. Li, M. Wu, Z. C. Geng, C. C. Tan, R. F. Du, and L. Jin, 1998. Genetic relationship of populations in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:11763-11768.
5. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., A. F. Groen, A. J. A. van Kampen, S. van der Beek, J. J. van der Poel, and M. A. M. Groenen, 1996a. Microsatellite polymorphism in commercial broiler and layer lines estimated using pooled blood samples. Poultry Sci. 75:904-909.
6. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., P. A. M. van Oers, J. A. Strijk, J. J. van der Poel, and M. A. M. Groenen, 1996b. Preliminary linkage map of the chicken (Gallus domesticus) genome based on microsatellite markers: 77 new markers mapped. Poultry Sci. 75:746-754.
7. Felsenstein, J., 1994. PHYLIP: Phylogenetic inference package, executables for 386 PCDOS. Version 3.5c. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
8. Freimer, N. B., and M. Slatkin, 1996. Microsatellites: Evolution and mutational processes. Ciba Found. Symp. 197:51-72.
9. LeDuc, C., P. Miller, J. Lichter, and P. Parry, 1995. Batched analysis of genotypes. PCR Meth. Appl. 4:331-336.
10. Lin, L., L. Jin, X. Lin, A. Voros, P. Underhill, and E. Mignot, 1998. Microsatellite single nucleotide polymorphisms in the HLA-DQ region. Tissue Antigens 52:9-18.
11. May, C. G., 1982. British Poultry Standards. 4th ed. Butterworth Scientific, London, UK.
12. Moiseyeva, I. G., 1992. Native breeds of domestic fowl. Pages 11-112 in: Farm Animal Generic Resources: Rare and Endangered Native Breeds. I. G. Moiseyeva, I. A. Zakharov, and R. S. Mitichashvili, ed. Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
13. Nei, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283-292.
14. Nei, M., and N. Takezaki, 1996. The root of the phylogenetic tree of human populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:170-177.
15. Notter, D. R., 1999. The importance of genetic diversity in livestock populations of the future. J. Anim. Sci. 77:61-69.
16. Reber, U., 1994. Hühner aus Ramelsloh. Deutsche Geflügelzeitung 42(16):14-15.
17. Romanov, M. N., and Yu V. Bondarenko, 1994. Introducing the Ukrainian indigenous poultry - the Poltava chickens. Fancy Fowl 14(2):8-9.
18. Romanov, M. N., S. Wezyk, K. Cywa-Benko, and N. I. Sakhatsky, 1996. Poultry genetic resources in the countries of Eastern Europe - history and current state. Poult. Avian Biol. Rev. 7:1-29.
19. Shriver, M. D., L. Jin, E. Boerwinkle, R. Deka, R. E. Ferell, and R. Chakraborty, 1995. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:914-920.
20. Takahashi, H., K. Nirasawa, Y. Nagamine, M. Tsudzuki, and Y. Yamamoto, 1998. Genetic relationships among Japanese native breeds of chicken based on microsatellite DNA polymorphisms. J. Hered. 89:543-546.
21. van Wulfften Palthe, A. W., 1992. C. S. Th. van Gink's Poultry Paintings. Dutch Branch of the WPSA, Beekbergen, The Netherlands.
22. Vanhala, T., M. Tuiskala-Haavisto, K. Elo, J. Vilkki, and A. Mäki-Tanila, 1998. Evaluation of genetic variability and genetic distances between eight chicken lines using microsatellite markers. Poultry Sci. 77:783-790.
23. Vits, W., 1989. Bergische Kräher - was nun? Geflügel-Börse 110(6):3-6.
24. Vits, W., 1994. Langkräher aus aller Welt. Geflügel-Börse 115(3):2-4.
25. Wandelt, R., and J. Wolters, 1996. Handbuch der Hühnerrassen - die Hühnerrassen der Welt. Verlag Wolters, Bottrop, Germany.
26. Weigend, S., E. Vef, G. Wesch, E. Meckenstock, R. Seibold, and F. Ellendorff, 1995. Concept for conserving genetic resources in poultry in Germany. Arch. Geflügelk. 59:327-334.
27. Weissmann, S., T. Carmon, M. Douaire, A. Cahaner, G. Zeitlin, U. Lavi, N. Avidan, B. Leclercq, and J. Hillel, 1998. Marker gene frequencies within and between divergently selected lines for high and low abdominal fat in chickens. Pages 280-283 in: Proceedings of the 10th European Poultry Conference, Vol. I. World's Poultry Science Association, Jerusalem, Israel.
28. Zhang, X. Q., G. F. Yang, Z. D. Shi, X. M. Lu, and X. H. Wu, 1996. Studies on genetic variation and relationships between fowl breeds based on microsatellite polymorphisms. Anim. Biotechnol. Bull. 5(Suppl.):54-59.
29. Zhou, H. J., and S. J. Lamont, 1999. Genetic characterization of biodiversity in highly inbred chicken lines by microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 30:256-264.