Comparative morphometrics of embryonic facial morphogenesis: Implications for cleft-lip etiology

Anatomical Record

Volumn 290, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 123-139

  Young, Nathan M ^a,d   Wat, Stephen ^a   Diewert, Virginia M ^b   Browder, Leon W ^c   Hallgrímsson, Benedikt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

A WySn; CL Fr; Craniofacial development; Geometric morphometrics; Mouse

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLEFT LIP; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MORPHOGENESIS; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NEURAL CREST CELL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FACE; MATHEMATICS; MICE; MICE, INBRED A; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE;

MUS;

EID: 33847323985     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19328494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.20415     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bailey DW. 1978. Sources of subline divergence and their relative importance for subline of six major inbred strains of mice. In: Morse HC, editor. Origins of inbred mice. New York: Academy Press. p 197-215.
2. Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Burnaby TP. 1966. Growth-invariant discriminant functions and generalized distances. Biometrics 22:96-110.
4. Chai Y, Maxson RE. 2006. Recent advances in craniofacial morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 235:2353-2375.
5. Cohen MM. 2003. The Hedgehog singaling network. Am J Med Genet A 123A:5-28.
6. Diewert VM, Wang KY. 1992. Recent advances in primary palate and midface morphogenesis research. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 4:111-130.
7. Diewert VM, Wang KY, Tait B. 1993. A new threshold model for cleft lip in mice. Ann NY Acad Sci 678:341-343.
8. Diewert VM, Lozanoff S. 2002. Animal models of facial clefting: experimental, congenital, and transgenic. In: Mooney MP, Siegel MI, editors. Understanding craniofacial anomalies: etiopathogenesis of craniosynostoses and facial clefting. New York: Wiley-Liss. p 251-272.
9. Forbes DP, Steffek AJ, Klepacki M. 1989. Reduced epithelial surface activity is related to a higher incidence of facial clefting in A/WySn mice. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 9:271-283.
10. Fraser FC, Pashyan H. 1970. Relation of face shape to susceptibility to congenital cleft lip: a preliminary report. J Med Genet 7:112-117.
11. Gharaibeh W. 2004. Correcting for the effect of orientation in geometric morphometric studies of side-view images of human heads. In: Slice DE, editor. Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. New York: Kluwer. p 111-143.
12. Hallgrímsson B, Dorval CJ, Zelditch ML, German RZ. 2004. Craniofacial variability and morphological integration in mice susceptible to cleft lip and palate. J Anat 205:501-517.
13. Jiang R, Bush JO, Lidral AC. 2006. Development of the upper lip: morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms. Dev Dyn 235:1152-1166.
14. Juriloff DM, Harris MJ, Dewell SL. 2004. A digenic cause of cleft lip in a-strain mice and definition of candidate genes for the two loci. Birth Defect Res 70:509-518.
15. Juriloff DM, Harris MJ, Dewell SL, Brown CJ, Mager DL, Gagnier L, Mah DG. 2005. Investigations of the genomic region that contains the clf1 mutation, a causal gene in multifactorial cleft lip and palate in mice. Birth Defect Res 73:103-113.
16. Juriloff DM, Harris MJ, McMahon AP, Carroll TJ, Lidral AC. 2006. Wnt9b is the mutated gene involved in multifactorial nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in A/WySn mice, as confirmed by a genetic complementation test. Birth Defect Res 76:574-579.
17. Liu Y, Liu CQ, Yamada Y, Fan CM. 2002. Growth arrest specific gene 1 acts as a region-specific mediator of the Fgf10/Fgf8 regulatory loop in the limb. Development 129:5289-5300.
18. Manly B. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman and Hall.
19. Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE. 1996. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum.
20. Millicovsky G, Ambrose LJH, Johnston MC. 1982. Developmental alterations associated with spontaneous cleft lip and palate in CL/Fr mice. Am J Anat 164:29-44.
21. Mullor JL, Altaba ARI. 2002. Growth, hedgehog and the price of GAS. Bioessays 24:22-26.
22. Richtsmeier JT, Deleon VB, Lele SR. 2002. The promise of geometric morphometrics. Yrbk Phys Anth 45:63-91.
23. Robertson CP, Braun MM, Roelink H. 2004. Sonic hedgehog patterning in chick neural plate is antagonized by a Wnt3-like signal. Dev Dyn 229:510-519.
24. Sun D, Baur S, Hay ED. 2000. Epithelial mesenchymal transformation is the mechanism for fusion of the craniofacial primordia involved in morphogenesis of the chicken lip. Dev Biol 228:337-349.
25. Trasler DG. 1968. Pathogenesis of cleft lip and its relation to embryonice face shape in A/J and C57BL mice. Teratology 1:33-50.
26. Wang KY, Diewert WM. 1992. A morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth in cleft lip and noncleft mice. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 12:141-154.
27. Wang KY, Juriloff DM, Diewert VM. 1995. Deficient and delayed primary palatal fusion and mesenchymal bridge formation in cleft lip-liable strains of mice. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 15:99-116.
28. Zelditch ML, Lundrigan BL, Garland T. 2004a. Developmental regulation of skull morphology: I, ontogenetic dynamics of variance. Evol Dev 6:194-206.
29. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL. 2004b. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. New York: Academic Press.