Arthur, George and the mystery of the missing motive: Towards a theory of evidentiary reasoning about motives

International Commentary on Evidence

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2006, Pages

  Walton, Douglas ^a   Schafer, Burkhard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Conan Doyle; Motives

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847298604     PISSN: 15544567     EISSN: 15544567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Atkinson, Katie, Trevor Bench-Capon and Peter McBurney, 'Justifying Practical Reasoning', Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2004), ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain, pp. 87-90.
2. Atkinson, Katie, Trevor Bench-Capon and Peter McBurney, 'PARMENIDES: Facilitating Democratic Debate', Electronic Government, ed. R. Traunmuller, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 3183. Third International Conference on eGovernment (EGOV 2004), DEXA 2004, Zaragoza, Spain, 2004a.
3. Atkinson, Katie, Trevor Bench-Capon and Peter McBurney, 'Agent Decision Making Using Argumentation About Actions', Technical Report ULCS-05-006, University of Liverpool, Computer Science Department, 2005.
4. Atkinson, Katie, Trevor Bench-Capon and Peter McBurney, 'Computational Representation of Practical Argument', Synthese, 152, 2006, 157-206.
5. Audi, Robert, Practical Reasoning, London, Routledge, 1989.
6. Bench-Capon, Trevor, 'Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks', Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 2003, 429-448.
7. Bratman, Michael, Intention, Plans and Practical Reason, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1987.
8. Bratman, Michael E., David J. Israel and Martha E. Pollack, 'Plans and Resource-bounded Practical Reasoning', Computational Intelligence, 4, 1988, 349-355.
9. Carberry, Sandra, Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1990.
10. Clarke, David S., Jr., Practical Inferences, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.
11. Farer, Tom J.,'Restraining the Barbarians: Can International Criminal Law Help?',Human Rights Quarterly Volume 22, Number 1, February 2000, pp. 90-117.
12. Farmer, Lindsay, 'Notable Trials and the Criminal Law in Scotland and England, 1750-1950', in P. Chassaigne and J-P Genet (eds), Droit et Societé en France et en Grande-Bretagne (XIIe-XXe siècles). Fonctions, usages et représentations Paris,2003 pp. 149-170
13. Federal Rules of Evidence, U. S. Courts, The Federal Judiciary, April 25, 2006, at: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules/newrules4.html
14. Freeman, James B. 'The Appeal to Popularity and Presumption by Common Knowledge', Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto, University Park, Pa., The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995, 263-273.
15. Girle, Rod, David Hitchcock, Peter McBurney and Bart Verhiej, 'Decision Support for Practical Reasoning: A Theoretical and Computational Perspective', Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, ed. Chris Reed and Timothy J. Norman, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2003, 58-84.
16. Goldman, Alvin, A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1970.
17. Gordon, Thomas F., 'Introductory Tutorial: Artificial Intelligence Models of Legal Argumentation', ECCO Competence Center, Fraunhofer FOKUS, Berlin, 2003.
18. Gordon, Thomas F. and Nikos Karacapilidis, 'The Zeno Argumentation Framework', Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Melbourne, Australia, 1997, 10-18.
19. Govier, Trudy, A Practical Study of Argument, 3rd ed., Belmont, Wadsworth, 1992.
20. Hamblin, Charles L., Fallacies, London, Methuen, 1970.
21. Hamblin, Charles L., 'Mathematical Models of Dialogue', Theoria, 37, 1971, 130-155.
22. Horty, John, and Nuel D. Belnap, 'The Deliberative Stit: A Study of Action, Omission, Ability and Obligation', Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24, 1995, 583-644.
23. Hughes, Patrick and Margaret Sanderson, 'Conspiracy Law and Jurisprudence in Canada: Towards an Economic Approach, Review of Industrial Organization, Volume 13, 1998
24. Hume, David, Commentaries on the Law of Scotland Respecting Crimes (4th ed. by BELL, B.R.). Edinburgh, Bell and Bradfute, 1844 (Reprinted by the Law Society of Scotland 1986).
25. Josephson, John R., and Susan G. Josephson, Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
26. Leonard, David P., 'Character and Motive in Evidence Law', Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 34, 2001, 439-536.
27. Lodder, Arno R., Dialaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1999.
28. Paglieri, Fabio and Cristiano Castelfranchi, 'Arguments as Belief Structures', The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University 18-21 May, 2005, ed. David Hitchcock, Hamilton, Ontario, 2005, 356-367.
29. Park, Roger C., David P. Leonard and Steven H. Goldberg, Evidence Law, St. Paul, Minneapolis, West Group, 1998
30. Peirce, Charles S., Reasoning and the Logic of Things, ed. Kenneth Laine Kettner, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1992.
31. Pollock, John L., Cognitive Carpentry, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1995.
32. Popper, Karl, The Open Society and its Enemies, vol 2, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
33. Popper, Karl, 'Relating Protocols for Dynamic Dispute with Logics for Defeasible Argumentation', Synthese, 127, 2001, 187-219.
34. Prakken, Henry, 'Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?', Fundamenta Informaticae, 20, 2001a, 1-20.
35. Prakken, Henry, Chris Reed and Douglas Walton, 'Dialogues about the Burden of Proof', Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Held June 6-11, 2005 in Bologna, Italy, New York, The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2005, 115-124.
36. Preyer, Gerhard and Dieter Mans, 'On Contemporary Developments in the Theory of Argumentation', Protosociology, 13, 1999, 3-13.
37. Reed, Chris and Glenn Rowe, Araucaria, Version 3, 2005. Available free at http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/araucaria/.
38. Reed, Chris and Timothy J. Norman, Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2003.
39. Searle, John R., Rationality in Action, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 2001.
40. Eco, Unberto and Thomas A. Sebeok , The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1988.
41. Segerberg, Krister, 'Towards an Exact Philosophy of Action', Topoi, 3, 1984, 75-83.
42. Verheij, Bart, 'Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11, 2003, 167-195.
43. Verheij, Bart, Virtual Arguments, The Hague, Asser Press, 2005.
44. Walker, Allan Grierson and Norman MacDonald Lockhart Walker, The Law of Evidence in Scotland, Edinburgh, T & T Clark, 2000
45. Walton, Douglas, Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation, Savage, Maryland, Rowman & Littlefield, 1990.
46. Walton, Douglas, Abductive Reasoning, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press, 2004.
47. Walton, Douglas, Character Evidence: An Abductive Theory, Argumentation Library Series, Dordrecht, Springer, 2006.
48. Walton, Douglas and Erik C. W. Krabbe, Commitment in Dialogue, Albany, State University of new York Press, 1995.
49. Walton, Douglas and Fabrizio Macagno, 'Common Knowledge in Legal Reasoning about Evidence', International Commentary on Evidence, 3, 2005, 1-42.
50. Wigmore, John H., The Principles of Judicial Proof, 2nd ed., Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1931.
51. Wooldridge, Michael, Reasoning about Rational Agents, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 2000.
52. Wooldridge, Michael, Introduction to MultiAgent Systems, Chichester, Wiley, 2002.
53. Zizek, Slavoj, The Detective and the Analyst, Literature and Psychology 36 (1990): 27-46.