Norm negotiation in multiagent systems

International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 97-122

  Boella, Guido ^a   Van Der Torre, Leendert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

Emergence of norms; Negotiation; Normative multiagent systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847239181     PISSN: 02188430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218843007001585     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. C. Alchourron, P. Gärdenfors and D. Makinson, On the logic of theory change, J Symbolic Logic 50(2) (1985) 510-530.
2. A. Anderson, A reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic, Mind 67 (1958) 100-103.
3. K. J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed (Wiley, New York, 1963).
4. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, Δ: The social delegation cycle, in Deontic Logic: 7th International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON'04), LNAI, Vol. 3065 (Springer, 2004), pp. 29-42.
5. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, The distribution of obligations by negotiation among autonomous agents, in Procs. 16th European Conf. Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'04) (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2004), pp. 13-17.
6. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, Enforceable social laws, in Procs. 4th Int. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'05) (ACM Press, NY, 2005), pp. 682-689.
7. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, A game theoretic approach to contracts in multiagent systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews 36(1) (2006) 68-79.
8. G. Boella, and L. van der Torre, Security policies for sharing knowledge in virtual communities, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 36(3) (2006) 439-450.
9. G. Boella, L. van der Torre and H. Verhagen, Introduction to normative multiagent system, Computation and Mathematical Organizational Theory, Special issue on Normative Multiagent Systems 12(2-3) (2006) 71-79.
10. J. Broersen, M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn and L. van der Torre, Goal generation in the BOID architecture, Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(3-4) (2002) 428-447.
11. E. Bulygin, Permissive norms and normative systems, in Automated Analysis of Legal Texts, eds. A. Martino and F. Socci Natali (Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1986), pp. 211-218.
12. C. Castelfranchi, Modeling social action for AI agents, Artificial Intelligence 103(1-2) (1998) 157-182.
13. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque, Intention is choice with commitment, Artificial Intelligence 42(2-3) (1990) 213-261.
14. R. Conte, C. Castelfranchi and F. Dignum, Autonomous norm-acceptance, in Intelligent Agents V (ATAL'98), LNCS, Vol. 1555 (Springer, Berlin, 1998), pp. 99-112.
15. M. Dastani and L. van der Torre, Specifying the merging of desires into goals in the context of beliefs, in Procs. of The First Eurasian Conference on Advances in Information and Communication Technology (EurAsia ICT'02), LNCS, Vol. 2510 (Springer, Berlin, 2002), pp. 824-831.
16. F. Dignum, Autonomous agents with norms, Artificial Intelligence, and Law 7 (1999) 69-79.
17. V. Dignum, J. Vázquez-Salceda and F. Dignum, A model of almost everything: Norms, structure and ontologies in agent organizations, in Procs. 3rd Int. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'04) (ACM, NY, 2004), pp. 1498-1499.
18. M. Esteva, J. Padget and C. Sierra, Formalizing a language for institutions and norms, in Intelligent Agents VIII (ATAL'01), LNCS, Vol. 2333 (Springer, Berlin, 2001), pp. 348-366.
19. M. Esteva, J. A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, C. Sierra and W. W. Vasconcelos, Verifying norm consistency in electronic institutions, in Procs. of Workshop on Agent Organizations at AAAI'04, San Jose (CA, 2004).
20. P. Gärdenfors, Knowledge in Flux (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988).
21. A. Jones and J. Carmo, Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, eds. D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, Vol. 3 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, NL, 2001), pp. 203-279.
22. H. Katsuno and A. O. Mendelzon, Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change, Artificial Intelligence 52(3) (1992) 263-294.
23. S. Konieczny and R. P. Pérez, On the frontier between arbitration and majority, in Procs. 8th Int. Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'02) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 2002), pp. 109-120.
24. F. Lopez, Y. Lopez, M. Luck and M. d'Inverno, Contraining autonomy through norms, in Procs. 2nd Int. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'02) (ACM, NY, 2002), pp. 674-681.
25. D. Makinson and L. van der Torre, Input-output logics, J. Philosophical Logic 29(4) (2000) 383-408.
26. D. Makinson and L. van der Torre, Constraints for input-output logics, J. Philosophical Logic 30(2) (2001) 155-185.
27. D. Makinson and L. van der Torre, Permissions from an input-output perspective, J. Philosophical Logic 32(4) (2003) 391-416.
28. J. J. Ch. Meyer, A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29(1) (1988) 109-136.
29. A. S. Rao and M. Georgeff, The semantics of intention maintenance for rational agents, in Procs. 14th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'95) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1995), pp. 704-710.
30. D. W. P. Ruiter, A basic classification of legal institutions, Ratio Juris 10(4) (1997) 357-371.
31. T. Sandholm, S. Sikka and S. Norden, Algorithms for optimizing leveled commitment contracts, in Procs. 16th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'99) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1999), pp. 535-541.
32. J. R. Searle, The Construction of Social Reality (The Free Press, New York, 1995).
33. Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz, On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-line design, Artificial Intelligence 73(1-2) (1995) 231-252.
34. Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz, On the emergence of social conventions: Modeling, analysis and simulations, Artificial Intelligence 94(1-2) (1997) 139-166.
35. V. Teague and L. Sonenberg, Investigating commitment flexibility in multiagent contracts, in Game Theory and Decision Theory in Agent-Based Systems, eds. S. Parsons, P. Gymtrasiewicz and M. Wooldridge (Kluwer, Dordrecht, NL, 2002), pp. 267-292.
36. M. Tennenholtz, On stable social laws and qualitative equilibria, Artificial Intelligence 102(1) (1998) 1-20.
37. L. van der Torre, Contextual deontic logic: Normative agents, violations and independence, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 37(1-2) (2003) 33-63.
38. L. van der Torre and Y. Tan, Contrary-to-duty reasoning with preference-based dyadic obligations, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 27(1-4) (1999) 49-78.
39. H. Verhagen, On the learning of norms, in Procs. of Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW'99), 1999.
40. G. H. von Wright, Deontic logic, Mind 60 (1951) 1-15.