Quality-A Radiology Imperative: Interpretation Accuracy and Pertinence

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 162-165

  Lee, Joseph K T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

interpretation accuracy; peer review; Quality

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PEER GROUP; PHYSICIAN; RADIOLOGIST; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 33847235049     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. To err is human: building a safer health system (1999), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
3. Nass S, Ball J. Improving breast imaging quality standards. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309096480/html/2.html.
4. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 2007 pre-publication management of human resources standards for hospitals. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/AccreditationPrograms/Hospitals/Standards/prepub_stds.htm.
5. Lexa F.J. 300,000 customers: patient perspectives on service and quality. J Am Coll Radiol 3 (2006) 346-350
6. Berlin L. Reporting the "missed" radiologic diagnosis: medicolegal and ethical considerations. Radiology 192 (1994) 183-187