Testing the role of coadapted genes versus bet-hedging for mating strategies in colour polymorphic pygmy grasshoppers

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 491-499

  Caesar, Sofia ^a   Ahnesjö, Jonas ^a   Forsman, Anders ^a  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Mating system; Polyandry; Tetrix subulata

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; BET-HEDGING; COLOR MORPH; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GRASSHOPPER; HABITAT SELECTION; NATURAL SELECTION; POLYANDRY; POLYMORPHISM; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ANIMALIA; TETRIGIDAE; TETRIX SUBULATA;

EID: 33847229496     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00739.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ahnesjö J, Forsman A. 2003. Correlated evolution of color pattern and body size in polymorphic pygmy grasshoppers, Tetrix undulata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 1308-1318.
2. Ahnesjö J, Forsman A. 2006. Differential habitat selection by pygmy grasshopper color morphs; interactive effects of temperature and predator avoidance. Evolutionary Ecology 20: 235-257.
3. Alonzo SH, Sinervo B. 2001. Mate choice games, context-dependent good genes, and genetic cycles in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49: 176-186.
4. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behavior 60: 145-164.
5. Brooks R. 2002. Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism. Genetica 116: 343-358.
6. Burley N, Krantzberg G, Radman P. 1982. Influence of colour-banding on the conspecific preferences of zebra finches. Animal Behavior 30: 444-455.
7. Dobzhansky T. 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
8. Fisher RA. 1930. The evolution of dominance in certain polymorphic species. American Naturalist 64: 385-406.
9. Fisher RA. 1939. Selective forces in wild populations of Paratettix texanus. Annals of Eugenics 9: 109-122.
10. Ford EB. 1964. Ecological genetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
11. Forsman A. 1999a. Reproductive life history variation among colour morphs of the pygmy grasshopper Tetrix subulata. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 67: 247-261.
12. Forsman A. 1999b. Variation in thermal sensitivity of performance among color morphs of a pygmy grasshopper, Tetrix subulata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 869-878.
13. Forsman A. 2000. Some like it hot: intra-population variation in behavioural thermo-regulation in colour-polymorphic pygmy grasshoppers. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 25-38.
14. Forsman A. 2001. Clutch size versus clutch interval: life history strategies in the colour-polymorphic pygmy grasshopper Tetrix subulata. Oecologica 129: 357-366.
15. Forsman A, Appelqvist S. 1998. Visual predators impose correlational selection on prey colour pattern and behaviour. Behavioral Ecology 9: 409-413.
16. Forsman A, Appelqvist S. 1999. Experimental manipulation reveals differential effects of colour pattern on survival in male and female pygmy grasshoppers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 391-401.
17. Forsman A, Ringblom K, Civantos E, Ahnesjö J. 2002. Coevolution of colour pattern and thermoregulatory behaviour in polymorphic pygmy grasshoppers Tetrix undulata. Evolution 56: 349-360.
18. Fox CW, Rauter CM. 2003. Bet-hedging and the evolution of multiple mating. Evolutionary Ecological Research 5: 273-286.
19. Gwynne DT, Simmons LW. 1990. Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346: 172-174.
20. Holst KT. 1986. The Saltatoria of Northern Europe. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 16: 1-127.
21. Hughes KA, Du L, Rodd H, Reznick DN. 1999. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Behavior 58: 907-916.
22. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews 75: 21-64.
23. Joron M, Brakefield PM. 2003. Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424: 191-194.
24. Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I. 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 404-408.
25. Majerus MEN. 2003. Sex wars - genes, bacteria and biased sex ratios. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Mays HL, Hill GE. 2004. Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 554-559.
27. Nabours RK. 1929. The genetics of the Tettigidae. Bibliographia Genetica. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 27-104
28. Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 364-371.
29. Piálek J, Albrecht T. 2005. Choosing mates: complementary versus compatible genes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 63.
30. Qvarnström A. 1999. Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53: 1564-1572.
31. Qvarnström A. 2001. Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 5-7.
32. Rowell CHF. 1971. The variable coloration of the Acridoid grasshoppers. Advances in Insect Physiology 8: 145-198.
33. Seehausen O, Witte F, van Alphen JJM, Bouton N. 1998. Direct mate choice maintains diversity among sympatric cichlids in Lake Victoria. Journal of Fish Biology 53: 37-55.
34. Seger J, Brockman HJ. 1987. What is bet-hedging? Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 4: 182-211.
35. Shine R. 1999. Why is sex determined by nest temperature in many reptiles? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 186-189.
36. Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37. Slatkin M. 1974. Hedging one's evolutionary bets. Nature 250: 704-705.
38. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edn. New York, NY: WH Freeman.
39. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Molecular Ecology 9: 1013-1027.
40. Trivers RL. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co., 1871-1971.
41. Van Dyck H, Matthysen E. 1998. Thermoregulatory differences between phenotypes in the speckled wood butterfly: hot perchers and cold patrollers? Oecologia 114: 326-334.
42. Welch AM. 2003. Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context dependent. Evolution 57: 883-893.
43. Willmer P. 1991. Thermal biology and mate acquisition in ectotherms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 396-399.
44. Wolff JO, Macdonald DW. 2004. Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 127-134.
45. Yasui Y. 1998. The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 246-250.
46. Yasui Y. 2001. Female multiple mating as a genetic bethedging strategy when mate choice criteria are unreliable. Ecological Research 16: 605-616.