Nurses as members of institutional review boards

Applied Nursing Research

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 101-107

  Dabbs, Annette DeVito ^a   Nolan, Marie T ^b  

^a PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; NURSE; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; NURSE CLINICIANS; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING SERVICE, HOSPITAL; PROFESSIONAL STAFF COMMITTEES; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 0031134792     PISSN: 08971897     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0897-1897(97)80171-1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Nurses Association. (1975). Human rights guidelines for nurses in clinical and other research. Kansas City, MO: Author.
2. Annas, G., & Grodin, M. (1992). The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code: Human rights in human experimentation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1948.)
3. Bandyk, E.A., & Gilmore, M.A. (1995). Perceived concerns of pregnant women with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy. Oncology Nursing Form, 22, 975-977.
4. Cassidy, V.R., & Oddi, L.F. (1993). Nurses on hospital IRBs: A critical voice in protecting human subjects. Nursing Connections, 6(1), 31-38.
5. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46. (1981). Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register, 8386-8391.
6. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46. (1991). Protection of Human Subjects, 1-8. Federal Register, 4-17.
7. Department of Health Education and Welfare (1979). Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Bethesda, MD: National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
8. Edgar, H., & Rothman, D.J. (1995). The institutional review board and beyond: Future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. The Milbank Quarterly. 73, 489-506.
9. Fuhs, M.F., & Moore, K. (1981). Research program development in a tertiary care setting. Nursing Research, 30, 24-27.
10. Grossman, S.A., Piantadosi, S., & Covahey, C. (1994). Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12, 2211-2215.
11. Iber, F.L., Riley, W.A., & Murray, P.J. (1987). Conducting clinical trials. New York: Plenum Medical.
12. Lamb, M.A. (1995). Effects of cancer on the sexuality and fertility of women. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 11, 120-127.
13. Lawson, S.L., & Adamson, H.M. (1995). Informed consent readability: Subject understanding of 15 common consent form phrases. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 17, 16-19.
14. National Institutes of Health (1991). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. (P.T. 34; K.W. 1014006, 0783005). Bethesda, MD: Author.
15. National Institutes of Health (1994). NIH guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. NIH Guide, (P.T. 34, vol. 23, No. 10). Bethesda, MD: Author.