An empirical test of the assumptions of case linkage and offender profiling with serial commercial robberies

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 59-85

  Woodhams, Jessica ^a,c   Toye, Kirsty ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Surrey Police ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d Surrey Police   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behavioral consistency; Case; Crime; Distinctiveness; Homology; Link; Offender profiling; Offense; Serical commercial robberies; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847219025     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.59     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Alison, L., Bennell, C., Mokros, A., & Ormerod, D. (2002). The personality paradox in offender profiling: A theoretical review of the processes involved in deriving background characteristics from crime scene actions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 115-135.
2. Alison, L., Rockett, W., Deprez, S., & Watts, S. (2000). Bandits, cowboys and Robin's men: The facets of armed robbery. In D. Canter & L. Alison (Eds.), Profiling property crimes (pp. 75-1.06). Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing.
3. Alison, L., Snook, B., & Stein, K. (2001). Unobtrusive measurement: Using police information for forensic research. Qualitative Research, 1, 241-254.
4. Bennell, C., & Canter, D. V. (2002). Linking commercial burglaries by modus operandi: Tests using regression and ROC analysis. Science and Justice, 42, 153-164.
5. Bennell, C., & Jones, N. J. (2005). Between a ROC and a hard place: A method for linking serial burglaries by modus operandi. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 23-41.
6. Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2000). SPSS for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
7. Canter, D. (1995). Psychology of offender profiling. In R. Bull & D. Carson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 343-355). Chichester, England: Wiley.
8. Canter, D., & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offences behavior: Developments in offender profiling. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1, 185-212.
9. Canter, D., Heritage, R., Wilson, M., Davies, A., Kirby, S., Holden, R., et al. (1991). A facet approach to offender profiling: Vol. 1. Guilford, England: University of Surrey, Psychology Department.
10. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
11. Davies, A. (1992). Rapist's behavior: A three-aspect model as a basis for analysis and the identification of serial crime. Forensic Science International, 55, 173-194.
12. Davies, A., Wittebrood, K., & Jackson, J. L. (1998). Predicting the criminal record of a stranger rapist. London: Home Office.
13. Farrington, D., & Lambert, S. (2000). Statistical approaches to offender profiling. In D. Canter & L. Alison (Eds.), Profiling property crimes (pp. 233-273). Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing.
14. Feeney, F. (1986). Robbers as decision-makers. In D. B. Cornish & R. V. Clarke (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 53-71). New York: Springer-Verlag.
15. Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of person, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 773-794.
16. Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable-centered, and person-centered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 421-447.
17. Green, E. J., Booth, C. E., & Biderman, M. D. (1976). Cluster analysis of burglary M/O's. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 4, 382-388.
18. Groscup, J. L., Penrod, S. D., Studebaker, C. A., Huss, M. T., & O'Neil, K. M. (2002). The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 339-372.
19. Grubin, D., Kelly, P., & Brunsdon, C. (2001). Linking serious sexual assault through behavior. London: Home Office, Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
20. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Copson, G. (1997). The role of the expert in criminal investigation. In J. L. Jackson & D. A. Bekerian (Eds.), Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 61-76). Chichester, England: Wiley.
21. Hazelwood, R. R., & Warren, J. I. (2003). Linkage analysis: Modus operandi, ritual, and signature in serial sexual crime. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 587-598.
22. Hettema, J., & Hol, D. P. (1998). Primary control and the consistency of interpersonal behavior across different situations. European Journal of Personality, 12, 231-247.
23. Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
24. Innes, M., Fielding, N., & Cope, N. (2005). The appliance of science? The theory and practice of criminal intelligence analysis. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 39-57.
25. Kinnear, P. R., & Gray, C. D. (2000). SPSS for Windows made simple. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
26. Knight, R. A., Warren, J. I., Reboussin, R., & Soley, B. J. (1998). Predicting rapist type from crime-scene variables. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 46-80.
27. Långström, N., Grann, M., & Lindblad, F. (2000). A preliminary typology of young sex offenders. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 319-329.
28. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
29. Mokros, A., & Alison, L. J. (2002). Is offender profiling possible? Testing the predicted homology of crime scene actions and background characteristics in a sample of rapists. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 25-43.
30. O'Donnell, I., & Morrison, S. (1997). Armed and dangerous? The use of firearms in robbery. Howard Journal, 36, 305-320.
31. Oldfield, D. (1997). What help do the police need with their enquiries? In J. L. Jackson & D. A. Bekerian (Eds.), Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 93-106). Chichester, England: Wiley.
32. Ormerod, D. (1999). Criminal profiling: Trial by judge and jury, not criminal psychologist. In D. Canter & L. J. Alison (Eds.), Profiling in policy and practice (pp. 207-261). Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing.
33. Ormerod, D., & Sturman, J. (2005). Working with the courts: Advice for expert witnesses. In L. Alison (Ed.), The forensic psychologists' casebook: Psychological profiling and criminal investigation (pp. 170-193). Devon, England: Willan.
34. Pervin, L. A. (2002). Current controversies and issues in personality (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
35. Prolific and other priority offenders strategy. (2004). Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.crimereduction.gov.uk/ppo/ppominisite01.htm
36. R v. Straffen (John Thomas), (1952) 2 Q.B. 911.
37. Salfati, C. G., & Bateman, A. L. (2005). Serial homicide: An investigation of behavioral consistency. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 121-144.
38. Salfati, C. G., & Canter, D. V. (1999). Differentiating stranger murders: Profiling offender characteristics from behavioral styles. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 391-406.
39. Santtila, P., Fritzon, K., & Tamelander, A. L. (2005). Linking arson incidents on the basis of crime scene behavior. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 19, 1-16.
40. Santtila, P., Junkkila, J., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2005). Behavioural linking of stranger rapes. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 87-103.
41. Santtila, P., Korpela, S., & Häkkänen, H. (2004). Expertise and decision-making in the linking of car crime series. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 97-112.
42. Santtila, P., Ritvanen, A., & Mokros, A. (2004). Predicting burglar characteristics from crime scene behavior. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 6, 136-154.
43. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J. C. (1993). The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1023-1035.
44. Smith, J. (2003). The nature of personal robbery. London: Home Office.
45. Snook, B. (2004). Individual differences in distance travelled by serial burglars. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 53-66.
46. State of New Jersey v. Fortin, 745 A.2d 509 (N.J. 2000).
47. Swets, J. A. (1988, June 3). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293.
48. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics, New York: HarperCollins.
49. Walsh, D. (1986). Heavy business: Commercial burglary and robbery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
50. Woodhams, J., Gillett, R., & Grant, T. (in press). Understanding the factors that affect the severity of juvenile stranger sex offenders: The effect of victim characteristics and number of suspects. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
51. Wright, J. C., & Mischel, W. (1987). A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1159-1177.
52. Wright, R., Logic, R. H., & Decker, S. H. (1995). Criminal expertise and offender decision making; An experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 39-53.