Laboratory-to-field extrapolation in aquatic sciences

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1067-1073

  Vignati, Davide A L ^a   Ferrari, Benoît J D ^a   Dominik, Janusz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTRAPOLATION;

AQUATIC SCIENCES;

WATER ANALYSIS;

EXTRAPOLATION; WATER ANALYSIS;

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FIELDWORK; LABORATORY METHOD; RESEARCH PROGRAM;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FIELD STUDY; LABORATORY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGY; LABORATORIES; RESEARCH; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 33847181680     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es0724745     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Munkittrick, K. R.; McCarty, L. S. An Integrated Approach to Aquatic Ecosystem Health: Top-Down, Bottom-Up or Middle-Out? J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health 1995, 4, 77-90.
2. Cairns, J., Jr. Integrating Top-Down/Bottom-Up Sustainability Strategies: An Ethical Challenge. Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. 2003, 1-6.
3. Baudo, R.; Beltrami, M.; Rossi, D. In Situ Tests To Assess the Potential Toxicity of Aquatic Sediments. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage. 1999, 2, 361-365.
4. Wenning, J. R., et al., Eds. Sediment Quality Guidelines and Related Tools for the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments; SETAC: Pensacola, FL, 2005.
5. Chapman, P. M.; Fairbrother, A.; Brown, D. A. Critical Evaluation of Safety (Uncertainty) Factors for Ecological Risk Assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1998, 17, 99-108.
6. Cairns, J., Jr. Ecotoxicology: An Opportunity for the Experimental Sciences. Asian J. Exp. Sci. 2005, 19, 1-17.
7. Langmuir, D.; et al. Issue Paper on the Environmental Chemistry of Metals, http://cfpub2.epa.gov/ncea/raf/recordisplay.cfm?deid=86119.
8. McGeer, J.; et al. Issue Paper on the Bioavailability and Bioaccumulation of Metals, http://cfpub2.epa.gov/ncea/raf/recordisplay.cfm?deid=86119.
9. Kapustka, L. A.; et al. Issue Paper on the Ecological Effects of Metals, http://cfpub2.epa.gov/ncea/raf/recordisplay. cfm?deid=86119.
10. Newman, M. C.; et al. Issue Paper on Metal Exposure Assessment, http://cfpub2.epa.gov/ncea/raf/recordisplay. cfm?deid=86119.
11. Chapman, P. M.; et al. Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments of Inorganic Metals and Metalloids: Current Status. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2003, 9, 641-697.
12. Bossuyt, B. T. A.; De Schamphelaere, K. A. C.; Janssen, C. R. Using the Biotic Ligand Model for Predicting the Acute Sensitivity of Cladoceran Dominated Communities to Copper in Natural Waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 5030-5037.
13. De Schamphelaere, K. A. C.; Janssen, C. R. Bioavailability Models for Predicting Copper Toxicity to Freshwater Microalgae as a Function of Water Chemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4514-4522.
14. Luoma, S. N. Prediction of Metal Toxicity in Nature from Bioassays: Limitations and Research Needs. In Metal Speciation and Bioavailability in Aquatic Systems; Tessier, A., Turner, D. R., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 1995.
15. Chen, Z.; et al. High Concentrations of Complexed Metals in the Guts of Deposit Feeders. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2000, 45, 1358-1367.
16. Weston, D. P.; Mayer, L. M. Comparison of In Vitro Digestive Fluid Extraction and Traditional In Vivo Approaches as Measures of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Bioavailability from Sediments. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1998, 17, 830-840.
17. Tessier, A.; Campbell, P. G. C.; Bisson, M. Sequential Extraction Procedure for the Speciation of Particulate Trace Metals. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51, 844-851.
18. Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M.; et al. A Conceptual Framework for Implementation of Bioavailability of Metals for Environmental Management Purposes. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1997, 37, 163-172.
19. Reichenberg, F.; Mayer, P. Two Complementary Sides of Bioavailability: Accessibility and Chemical Activity of Organic Contaminants in Sediments and Soils. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25, 1239-1245.
20. Town, R. M.; Filella, M. Dispelling the Myths: Is the Existence of L1 and L2 Ligands Necessary To Explain Metal Ion Speciation in Natural Waters? Limnol. Oceanogr. 2000, 45, 1341-1357.
21. Town, R. M.; Filella, M. Crucial Role of the Detection Window in Metal Ion Speciation Analysis in Aquatic Systems: The Interplay of Thermodynamic and Kinetic Factors as Exemplified by Nickel and Cobalt. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 466, 285-293.
22. Tipping, E. Cation Binding by Humic Substances; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2002; pp 380-390.
23. Escher, B. A.; Hermens, J. L. M. Modes of Action in Ecotoxicology: Their Role in Body Burdens, Species Sensitivity, QSARs, and Mixture Effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4201-4217.
24. Sumpter, J. P.; Johnson, A. C. Lessons from Endocrine Disruption and Their Application to Other Issues Concerning Trace Organics in Aquatic Environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 4321-4332.
25. Cairns, J., Jr. Commentary on the Developing Field of Ecotoxicology. Popul. Environ. 1999, 20, 381-386.
26. McCarty, L. S.; MacKay, D. Enhancing Ecotoxicological Modeling and Assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 1719-1728.
27. Connell, D. W.; Chaisuksant, Y.; Yu., J. Importance of Internal Biotic Concentrations in Risk Evaluation with Aquatic Systems. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1999, 39, 54-61.
28. Rainbow, P. S. Trace Metal Concentrations in Aquatic Invertebrates: Why and So What? Environ. Pollut. 2002, 120, 497-507.
29. Luoma, S. N.; Rainbow, P. S. Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1921-1931.
30. Schlenk, D. Necessity of Defining Biomarker for Use in Ecological Risk Assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1999, 39, 48-53.
31. McCarty, L. S.; Power, M.; Munkittrick, K. R. Bioindicators Versus Biomarkers in Ecological Risk Assessment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2002, 8, 159-164.
32. Choi, J. H.; Roche, H.; Caquet, T. Effects of Physical (Hypoxia, Hyperoxia) and Chemical (Potassium Dichromate, Fenitrothion) Stress on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Chironomus riparius Mg. (Diptera, Chironomidae) Larvae: Potential Biomarkers. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19, 495-500.
33. Karouna-Renier, N. K.; Zehr, J. P. Short-Term Exposure to Chronically Toxic Copper Concentrations Induce HSP70 Proteins in Midge Larvae (Chironomus tentans). Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 312, 267-272.
34. Forbes, V. E.; Palmqvist, A.; Back, L. The Use and Misuse of Biomarkers in Ecotoxicology. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25, 272-280.
35. Vasseur, P.; Cossu-Leguille, C. Linking Molecular Interactions to Consequent Effects of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) upon Populations. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 1033-1042.
36. Cairns, J., Jr. Communication and Status: The Dilemma of an Environmental Scientist. Speculat. Sci. Technol. 1993, 16, 163-170.
37. Huesemann, M. H. Can Pollution Problems be Effectively Solved by Environmental Science and Technology? An Analysis of Critical Limitations. Ecol. Econ. 2001, 37, 271-287.
38. Silva, E.; Rajapakse, N.; Kortenkamp, A. Something from "Nothing"-Eight Weak Estrogenic Chemicals Combined at Concentrations below NOECs Produce Significant Mixture Effect. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1751-1756.
39. Brian, J. V.; et al. Accurate Prediction of the Response of Freshwater Fish to a Mixture of Estrogenic Chemicals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 721-728.
40. Sulzberger, B. Why Do We Need To Span the Range from Molecular-Level to Whole Ecosystem Scale Studies in Environmental Research? Aquat. Sci. 2006, 68, i.
41. Schwarzenbach, R. P.; et al. The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems. Science 2006, 313, 1072-1077.
42. Ducrot, V.; et al. Using Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Species Traits To Build Test Batteries for Sediment Toxicity Assessment: Accounting for the Diversity of Potential Biological Responses to Toxicants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 2306-2315.
43. Eggen, R. I. L.; et al. Challenges in Ecotoxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 58A-64A.
44. Chapman, P. M.; Loehr, R. C. Relevant Environmental Science. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22, 2217-2218.
45. Orr, D. W.; Ehrenfeld, D. None so Blind: The Problem of Ecological Denial. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 9, 985-987.
46. Cairns, J., Jr. You and Earth's Resources. Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. 2004, 9-11.
47. Maltby, L.; Burton, A. G., Jr. Field-Based Effect Measures. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25, 2261-2262.