Field-based effects measures

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 2261-2262

  Maltby, Lorraine ^a   Burton Jr , G Allen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; FRESH WATER;

FIELD METHOD; TOXICOLOGY;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INVERTEBRATE; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FRESH WATER; INVERTEBRATES; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 33750577243     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/06-267.1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. U.S. Code 33, Sections 1251 to 1387. 2006. Clean Water Act.
2. Rosenberg DM, Resh VH. 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA.
3. Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, 2nd ed. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
4. European Community. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327:1-72.
5. Maltby L, Clayton SA, Wood RM, McLoughlin N. 2002. Evaluation of the Gommants in situ feeding assay as a biomonitor of water quality: Robustness, responsiveness, and relevance. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:361-368.
6. Courtney LA, Clements WH. 2002. Assessing the influence of water and substratum quality on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a metal-polluted stream: An experimental approach. Freshw Biol 47:1766-1778.
7. Solomon KR, Liber K, Kaushik NK. 1990. Lake mesocosms: Techniques and procedures for assessing pesticide ecotoxicology. Proceedings, Experimental Ecosystems: Applications to Ecotoxicology. Technical Information Workshop, North American Benthological Society Meeting, Blacksburg, VA, USA, May, pp 15-20.
8. Culp JM, Cash KJ, Glozier NE, Brua RB. 2003. Effects of pulp mill effluent on benthic assemblages in mesocosms along the St. John River, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:2916-2925.
9. Gerhardt A, Schmidt S. 2002. The multispecies freshwater biomonitor-A potential new tool for sediment biotests and biomonitoring. J Soils Sediments 2:67-70.
10. Burton GA Jr, Greenberg MS, Rowland CD, Irvine CA, Lavoie DR, Brooker JA, Moore L, Raymer DFN, McWilliam RA. 2005. In situ exposures using caged organisms: A multicompartment approach to detect aquatic toxicity and bioaccumulation. Environ Pollut 134:133-144.
11. American Society for Testing and Materials. 2006. Standard Guide for Conducting In-Situ Field Bioassays with Caged Bivalves. E 47.01. E 2122-02. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 11.06. Philadelphia, PA.
12. Adams W, Green A, Ahlf W, Brown SS, Burton GA, Crane M, Gouguet R, Chadwick B, Reynoldson T, Savitz JD, Sibly PK. 2005. Using sediment assessment tools and a weight of evidence approach. In Wenning RJ, Batley GE, Ingersoll CG, Moore DW, eds, Use of Sediment-Quality Guidelines and Related Tools for the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA, pp 163-226.