Testing and reporting contrast sensitivity

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 359-360

  Packer, Mark ^a   Ginsburg, Arthur P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; LETTER; MYDRIASIS; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; VISUAL ACUITY;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PSEUDOPHAKIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; VISION TESTS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33847155413     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.061     Document Type: Letter

References (18)

1. Muñoz G., Albarrán-Diego C., Montés Micó R., et al. Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 1320-1327
2. Padmanabhan P., Rao S.K., Jayasree R., et al. Monochromatic aberrations in eyes with different intraocular lens optic designs. J Refract Surg 22 (2006) 78-84
3. Kasper T., Bühren J., and Kohnen T. Intraindividual comparison of higher-order aberrations after implantation of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses as a function of pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 78-84
4. Marcos S., Barbero S., and Jiménez-Alfaro I. Optical quality and depth-of-field of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) 223-235
5. Bellucci R., Morselli S., and Piers P. Comparison of wavefront aberrations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 20 (2004) 297-306
6. Mester U., Dillinger P., and Anterist N. Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 652-660
7. Packer M., Fine I.H., Hoffman R.S., and Piers P.A. Prospective randomized trial of an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 18 (2002) 692-696
8. Packer M., Fine I.H., Hoffman R.S., and Piers P.A. Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 986-992
9. Kennis H., Huygens M., and Callebaut F. Comparing the contrast sensitivity of a modified prolate anterior surface IOL and of two spherical IOLs. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 294 (2004) 49-58
10. Bellucci R., Scialdone A., Buratto L., et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: a multicenter randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 712-717
11. Kershner R.M. Retinal image contrast and functional visual performance with aspheric, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses; prospective evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 1684-1694
12. Denoyer A., Roger F., Majzoub S., and Pisella P.J. Qualité de vision des patients porteurs d'un implant asphérique prolate après chirurgie de la cataracte. J Fr Ophtalmol 29 (2006) 157-163
13. Martínez Palmer A., Palacín Miranda B., Castilla Céspedes M., et al. Influencia de la aberración esférica en la función visual tras cirugía de catarata: ensayo prospectivo aleatorio. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 80 (2005) 71-77
14. Ricci F., Scuderi G., Missiroli F., et al. Low contrast visual acuity in pseudophakic patients implanted with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 82 (2004) 718-722
15. Montés-Micó R., and Alió J.L. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 703-711
16. Nio Y.-K., Jansonius N.M., Geraghty E., et al. Effect of intraocular lens implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 2073-2081
17. Ginsburg A.P. Next generation contrast sensitivity testing. In: Rosenthal B.P., and Cole R.G. (Eds). Functional Assessment of Low Vision (1996), Mosby, St Louis, MO 77-88
18. Boxer Wachler B.S., and Krueger R.R. Normalized contrast sensitivity values. J Refract Surg 14 (1998) 463-466