Informed consent in clinical medicine

Chest

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 563-568

  Terry, Peter B ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Ethics; Informed consent

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRONCHOSCOPY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPETENCE; CULTURAL FACTOR; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LUNG EMBOLISM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; RESUSCITATION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 33847155139     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.06-1955     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Pellegrino ED. The metamorphosis of medical ethics: a 30 year retrospective. JAMA 1993; 269:1158-1162
2. Faden R, Beauchamp T. A history and theory of informed consent, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986
3. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10 Nuremberg, October 1946-April 1949. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949-1953
4. Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 1966; 274:1354-1360
5. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001
6. Manthous CA, DeGirolamo A, Haddad C, et al. Informed consent for medical procedures: local and national practices. Chest 2003; 124:1978-1984
7. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12:189-198
8. Sulmasy DP, Terry PB, Weisman CS, et al. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:621-629
9. Zweibel NR, Cassel CK. Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist 1989; 29:615-621
10. Seckler AB, Meier DE, Mulvihill M, et al. Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115:92-98
11. Terry PB, Vettese M, Song J, et al. End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics 1999; 10:286-293
12. Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate. Med Care 2000; 38:335-341
13. Flood AB, Wennberg JE, Nease RF Jr, et al. The importance of patient preferences in the decision to screen for prostate cancer: prostate patient outcomes research team. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11:342-349
14. Degner LF, Sloan JH. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:941-950
15. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, et al. Not all patients want to participate in nedical decision making: a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20:531-535
16. Meleis AI, Jonsen AR. Ethical crises and cultural differences. West J Med 1983; 138:889-893
17. Cobbs v Grant, 502 P. 2d 1, 12, 1972