Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 518-523

  Canoglu, Harun ^a   Tekcicek, Meryem U ^a   Cehreli, Zafer C ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Image analysis; Primary tooth; Root canal irrigants; Root canal preparation; Root canal sealants

Indexed keywords

AH PLUS; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CHELATING AGENT; DENTAL ALLOY; EDETIC ACID; EPOXY RESIN; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SEALITE; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PULP; ULTRASOUND THERAPY;

CHELATING AGENTS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTIN; EDETIC ACID; EPOXY RESINS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; ULTRASONIC THERAPY; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 33847141059     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. American Association of Pediatric Dentistry Reference Manual 2004-2005. Pediatr Dent 2004;7:115-16.
2. Primosch RE, Glomb TA, Jerrell RG. Primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in predoctoral pediatric dental programs in the United States. Pediatr Dent 1997:19:118-22.
3. Barr SE, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:77-8.
4. Seow WK. Comparison of ultrasonic and mechanical cleaning of primary root canals using a novel radiometric method. Pediatr Dent 1991;13:136-41.
5. Sullivan SM, Hartwell GR. Obturation of a retained primary mandibular second molar using mineral trioxide aggregate: A case report. J Endod 2001;27:703-05.
6. Silva LAB, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, Tanomaru JMG. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child 2004;71:45-7.
7. Alacam A. The effect of various irrigants on the adaptation of paste filling in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1992:16:243-46.
8. th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Co; 1994:659-61.
9. Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: A review. Pediatr Dent 1983:5:33-7.
10. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971:32:271-75.
11. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with Image J. Biophotonics Int 2004;11:36-42.
12. Veltri M, Mollo A, Pini PP, Ghelli LF, Balleri P. In vitro comparison of shaping abilities of ProTaper and GT rotary files. J Endod 2004:30:163-66.
13. Gambill JM, Alder M, Del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod 1996:22:369-75.
14. th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby Co; 2006:148-232.
15. Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endod 1987:13:243-45.
16. Tachibana H, Matsumoto K. Applicability of X ray computerized tomography in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:16-20.
17. Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD, Carnes DL, Lancaster JL. Microcomputed tomography: An advanced system for detailed endodontic research. J Endod 1995:21:561-68.
18. Rhodes JS, Pitt Ford TR, Lynch JA, Liepins PJ, Curtis RV. Microcomputed tomography: A new tool for experimental endodontology. Int Endod J 1999:32:165-70.
19. Sydney GB, Batista A, de Mélo LL. The radiographic platform: A new method to evaluate root canal preparation in vitro. J Endod 1991:17:570-72.
20. Southard DW, Oswald RJ, Natkin E. Instrumentation of curved molar root canals with the Roane technique. J Endod 1987:13:479-89.
21. Stamm T, Kaup M, Hohoff A, Meier T, Meyer U. Validity of a three-dimensional public-domain system for contemporary endodontic research. J Endod 2003:29:801-05.
22. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenger K, Barbakow F. Pro Taper rotary root canal preparation: Effects of canal anatomy on final shape analyzed by micro CT. Int Endod J 2003:36:86-92.
23. YoshimineY, Ono M, Akamine A. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 2005:31:373-75.
24. Ringlestein D, Seow WK. The prevalence of furcation foramina in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 1989:11:189-202.
25. Hibbard EP, Ireland RL. Morphology of the root canals of the primary molar teeth. J Dent Child 1957:24:250-57.
26. White RR, Goldman M, Lin PS. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. Part II. J Endod 1987:13:369-74.
27. Economides N, Liolios E, Kolokuris I, Beltes P. Longterm evaluation of the influence of smear layer removal on the sealing ability of different sealers. J Endod 1999:25:123-25.
28. Kokkas AB, Boutsioukis AC, Vassiliadis LP, Stavrianos CK. The influence of the smear layer in dentinal tubule penetration depth by three different root canal sealers: An in vitro study. J Endod 2004;30:100-02.