A knowledge-driven model to personalize e-learning

ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Teo, Chao Boon ^a   Gay, Robert Kheng Leng ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Concept map; Distance learning; e learning; Instructional design; Knowledge management

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

CONCEPT MAPS; DISTANCE LEARNING; E-LEARNING; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 33847122037     PISSN: 15314278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1217862.1217865     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ACKOFF, R.L. 1997. Transformational consulting. Management Consulting Times 28, 6.
2. ADLER, C. AND RAE, S. 2002. Personalized learning environments: The future of e-learning is learner-centric. E-learning 3, 1, 22-24.
3. BRUCKMAN, A. 2002. The future of e-learning communities. Commun. ACM 45, 4, 60-63.
4. BARR, R.B. AND TAGG, J. 1995. From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change 27, 6, 13-25.
5. BARRITT, C. AND WIESELER, W. 1999. Reusable Information Object Strategy, 1999. Cisco Systems, 1-32.
6. BERNERS-LEE, T., HENDLER, J., AND LASSILA, O. 2001. The semantic web. Scientific American (May).
7. CHEE, S. 2004. Distance education and e-lcarning in the digital age: Critical considerations. In (2004), Intelligent Virtual World: Technologies and Applications in Distributed World Environments, T. Shih, ed. 289-308.
8. CHOO, C.W., DETLOR, B., AND TURNSBULL, D. 2000. Web Work: Information Seeking and Knowledge Work on the World Wide Web. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
9. COLE, R.J. AND EKLUND, P.W. 1996. Applications of Formal Concept Analysis to Information Retrieval Using a Hierarchically Structured Thesaurus Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Representation as Interlingua. P. Eklund et al. eds., Springer Verlag, New York.
10. DAVENPORT, T. AND PRUSAK, L. 1998. Working Knowledge. How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. th).
12. GANTER, B. AND WILLE, R. 1999. Formal Concept Analysis - Mathematical Foundations. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
13. st Century. Basic Books, New York.
14. GAY, K.L. AND TEO, C.B. 2006. Redefining E-learning. In Proceedings of Digital Learning Asia 2006 Conference (Bangkok, April 26-28).
15. GRANT, R. M. 1997. The knowledge-based view of the firm: implications for management practice. Long Range Planning 30, 3, 450-454.
16. HENZE, N., DOLOG, P., AND NEJDL, W. 2004. Reasoning and ontologies for personalized e-learning. ETS J. Special Issue on Ontologies and Semantic Web for eLearning.
17. KOSTAS, M., PSARRAS, J., AND PAPASTEFANATOS, S. 2002. Knowledge and information management in e-learning environments: The user agent architecture. Inf. Manage. Comput. Security 10, 4, 165-170.
18. MCCALLA, G. 2004. The ecological approach to the design of E-learning environments: Purpose-based capture and use of information about learners. J. Interactive Media Education 7. Special issue on the educational semantic web.
19. MILTIADIS, D.L. AND POULOUDI, N. 2001. E-learning: Just a waste of time. In Proceedings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2001, Boston, MA, Aug. 3-5). D. Strong et al. eds., 216-222.
20. POLANYI, M. 1958/1962. Personal Knowledge. Corrected ed., Routledge, London.
21. POLSANI, P.R. 2003. Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. JoDI - J. Digital Inf. 3, 4.
22. RONCHETTI, M. AND SAINI, P. 2004. Knowledge management in an e-learning system. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04, Joensuu, Finland, Aug. 30-Sept. 1). 365-369.
23. ROSENBERG, M.J. 2001. E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. McGraw-Hill, New York.
24. SARKER, S. AND NICHOLSON, J. 2005. Exploring the myths about online education in information systems. Inf. Science J. 8, 55-73.
25. TEO, C.B. AND GAY, K.L. 2004a. Concept map approach to E-learning. In Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning Corporations, Government, Health, and Higher Education. 2160-2165.
26. TEO, C.B. AND GAY, K.L. 2004b. Concept-based system design to personalize E-learning. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Science Applications 1, 5 (Nov.), 1248-1255.
27. TEO, C.B. AND GAY, K.L.. 2005a. Content authoring system to personalize E-learning. In Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Distance Learning and Web Engineering (Corfu, Greece, August 23-25), 105-110.
28. TEO, C.B. AND GAY, K.L. 2005b. Personalization issues in E-learning. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Science Applications 2, 10 (Oct.), 1514-1522.
29. TEO, C.B. AND GAY, K.L. 2006a. Concept map provision for E-learning. Int. J. Instructional Technology Distance Learning 3, 7, 17 - 32.
30. TEO, C.B. AND GAY, K.L. 2006b. Provision of self-directed learning using concept mapping. WSEAS Trans. Advances Eng. Education 3, 6 (June), 491-498.
31. TEO, C.B, CHANG, S. C., AND GAY, K.L. 2006. Pedagogy considerations for E-learning. Int. J. Instructional Technology Distance Learning 3,5 (May), 3-26.
32. VALTCHEV, P., MISSAOUI, R., AND GODIN, R. 2004. Formal concept analysis for knowledge discovery and data mining: The new challenges. In Concept Lattices: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, LNCS 2961. P. Eklund ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin, 352-371.
33. WILLE, R. 1992. Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Computers and Math. Applications 23, 493-515.