Impacts of land use change scenarios on hydrology and land use patterns in the Wu-Tu watershed in Northern Taiwan

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 80, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 111-126

  Lin, Yu Pin ^a   Hong, Nien Ming ^b   Wu, Pei Jung ^a   Wu, Chen Fa ^c   Verburg, Peter H ^d  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b OVERSEAS CHINESE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment; Hydrological modeling; Land use change modeling; Landscape ecology; Landscape metrics; Watershed planning

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; WATERSHEDS;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND USE CHANGE MODELING; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; LANDSCAPE METRICS; WATERSHED PLANNING;

LAND USE;

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGY; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; POLICY STRATEGY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; TAIPEI; TAIWAN;

EID: 33847082145     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agarwal C., G.M. Green, J.M. Grove, T.P. Evans, C.M. Schweik, 2002. A review and assessment of land use change models: dynamics of space time and human choice, CIPEC Collaborative Report Series No. 1, USDA Forest Service Indiana, pp. 84.
2. Berling-Wolff S., and Wu J. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosyst. 7 (2004) 215-240
3. Botequilha Leitao A., and Ahern J. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plan. 59 (2002) 65-93
4. Brown D.G., Page S., Riolo R., Zellener M., and Rand W. Patch dependence and the validation of agent based spatial models of land use. Int. J. Geograph. Inform. Sci. 19 (2005) 153-174
5. Caruso G., Rounsevell M.D.A., and Cojacarus G. Exploring a spatio-dynamic neighborhood-based model of residential behaviour in the Brussels peri-urban area. Int. J. Geograph. Inform. Sci. 19 (2005) 103-123
6. Cheng S.J., and Wang R.Y. An approach for evaluating the hydrological effects of urbanization and its application. Hydrol. Process. 16 (2002) 1403-1418
7. Corry R.C., and Nassauer J.I. Limitations of using landscape pattern indices to evaluate the ecological consequences of alternative plans and designs. Landscape Urban Plan. 72 (2005) 265-280
8. Cushman S.A., and Wallin D.O. Rate and patterns of landscape change in the Central Sikhote-alin Mountains, Russian Far East. Landscape Ecol. 15 (2000) 643-659
9. Dale V.H., Brown S., Haeuber R.A., Hobbs N.T., Huntly N., Naiman R.J., Riebsame W.E., Turner M.G., and Valone T.J. Ecological principles and guildelines for managing the use of land: a report from the Ecological Society of America. Ecol. Appl. 10 (2000) 639-670
10. Dietzel C., Herold M., Hemphill J.J., and Clarke K.C. Spatial-temporal dynamics in California's central Valley: empirical links to urban theory. Int. J. Geograph. Inform. Sci. 19 (2005) 175-195
11. Fortin M.J., Boots B., Csillag F., and Remmel T.K. On the role of spatial stochastic models in understanding landscape indices in ecology. Oikos 102 (2003) 203-212
12. Gustafson E.J. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art?. Ecosystems 1 (1998) 143-156
13. Haith D.A., and Shoemaker I.L. Generalized watershed loading functions for stream flow nutrients. Water Resour. Bull. 107 (1987) 121-137
14. Hamon W.R. Estimating potential evapotranspiration. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineering. J. Hydraul. Div. 87 (1961) 107-120
15. Haverkamp S., Fohrer N., and Frede H.G. Assessment of the effect of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: a comprehensive GIS-based tool to minimize model uncertainty resulting from spatial aggregation. Hydrol. Process. 19 (2005) 715-727
16. Jantz C.A., and Goetz S.J. Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land use change model. Int. J. Geograph. Inform. Sci. 19 (2005) 217-241
17. Jongman R.H.G. Landscape ecology in land use planning. In: Wiens J.A., and Moss M.R. (Eds). Issue in Landscape Ecology. International Association for Landscape Ecology (1999), Guelph, Ontario 112-118
18. Kaimowitz, D., Angelsen, A., 1998. Economic models of tropical deforestation: a review. Bogor, CIFOR.
19. Kearns F.R., Kelly N.M., Carter J.L., and Resh V.H. A method for the use of landscape metrics in freshwater research and management. Landscape Ecol. 20 (2005) 113-125
20. Lambin, E.F., 1994. Modeling deforestation processes: a review. tropical ecosystem environment observations by satellites (TREES) series B: Research Report no. 1. Luxembourg, European Commission, 113 pp.
21. Lambin E.F., Turner II B.L., Geist H.J., Agbola S.B., Angelsen A., Bruce J.W., Coomes O., Dirzo R., Fischer G., Folke C., George P.S., Homewood K., Imbernon J., Leemans R., Li X., Moran E.F., Mortimore M., Ramakrishnan P.S., Richards J.F., Skånes H., Steffen W., Stone G., Svedin U., Veldkamp T.A., Vogel C., and Xu J. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environ. Change: Human Policy Dimen. 11 (2001) 5-13
22. Legesse D., Vallet-Coulomb C., and Gasse F. Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: case study South Central Ethiopia. J. Hydrol. 275 (2003) 67-85
23. Li H.B., and Wu J.G. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecol. 19 (2004) 389-399
24. Lin Y.P., Teng T.P., and Chang T.K. Multivariate analysis of soil heavy metal pollution and landscape patterns analysis in Changhua County in Taiwan. Landscape Urban Plan. 62 (2002) 19-35
25. Luijten J.C. A systematic method for generating land use patterns using stochastic rules and basic landscape characteristics: results for a Colombia hillside watershed. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 95 (2003) 427-441
26. Manson S.M. Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land change in the Southern Yucatan. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 111 (2005) 47-62
27. McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J., 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical report. PNW-351
28. Overmars K., and Verburg P. Analysis of land use drivers at the watershed and household level: linking two paradigms at the Philippine forest fringe. Int. J. Geograph. Inform. Sci. 19 (2005) 125-152
29. Parker D., and Meretsky V. Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 101 (2004) 233-250
30. Parker D.C., Berger T., and Manson S.M. Agent-based Models of Land Use and Land Cover Change, Report and Review of an International Workshop. October 4-7, 2001, LUCC Focus 1 Office, Indiana (2002) 124
31. Pontius R.G., and Malason J. Comparison of the accuracy of land change models: cellular Automata Markov versus Geomod. Int. J. Geograph. Inform. Sci. 19 (2005) 243-265
32. Remmel T.K., and Csillag F. When are two landscape pattern indices significantly different?. J. Geograph. Syst. 5 (2003) 331-351
33. Rounsevell M.D.A., Annetts J.E., Audsley E., Mayr T., and Reginster I. Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 95 (2003) 465-479
34. Serneels S., and Lambin E.F. Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 85 (2001) 65-81
35. Stewart T.J., Janssen R., and van Herwijnen M. A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning. Comp. Oper. Res. 31 (2004) 2293-2313
36. Tung C.P. Climate change impacts on water resources of the Tesngwen creek watershed in Taiwan. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc. 37 (2001) 167-176
37. Turner, B.L., Moss, R.H. Skole, D.L. (Eds.), 1993. Relating Land Use and Global Land-cover Change: A Proposal For an IGBP-HDP Core Project. Report from the IGBP-HDP Working Group on Land-Use/Land-Cover Change. Joint publication of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (Report No. 24) and the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Programme (Report No. 5). Stockholm, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
38. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., and O'Neill R.V. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice Pattern and Process (2001), Springer-Verlag, New York pp. 401
39. Verburg P.H., Soepboer W., Veldkamp A., Limpiada R., and Espaldon V. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-s model. Environ. Manage. 30 (2002) 391-405
40. Verburg P.H., van Eck J.R., de Hijs T.C., Dijst M.J., and Schot P. Determination of land use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Design 31 (2004) 125-150
41. Verburg P.H., and Veldkamp A. Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecol. 19 (2004) 77-98
42. Wang X., Yu S., and Huang G.H. Land allocation based on integrated GIS-optimization modeling at a watershed level. Landscape Urban Plan. 66 (2004) 61-74
43. Wear D.N., and Bolstad P. Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscape: spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems 1 (1998) 575-594
44. Weinstoerffer J., and Girardin P. Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: use of a landscape indicator. Ecol. Model. 130 (2000) 95-109