European starlings are capable of discriminating subtle size asymmetries in paired stimuli

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-49

  Swaddle, John P ^a   Johnson, Charles W ^a  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

Aviary based testing; Cue; Discrimination learning; European starlings; Fluctuating asymmetry; Food discrimination; Size symmetry; Visual images

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; STARLING; TASTE;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CUES; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SIZE PERCEPTION; STARLINGS; TASTE;

EID: 33847047862     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.103-05     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. Balmford, A., Jones, I. L., & Thomas, A. L. R. (1993). On avian asymmetry: Evidence of natural selection for symmetrical tails and wings in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 252, 245-251.
3. Delius, J. D., & Habers, G. (1978). Symmetry: Can pigeons conceptualize it? Behavioral Biology, 22, 336-342.
4. Delius, J. D., & Nowak, B. (1982). Visual symmetry recognition by pigeons. Psychological Research, 44, 199-212.
5. Dufour, K. W., & Weatherhead, P. J. (1998a). Bilateral symmetry and social dominance on captive male redwinged blackbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 71-76.
6. Dufour, K. W., & Weatherhead, P. J. (1998b). Bilateral symmetry as an indicator of male quality in redwinged blackbirds: Associations with measures of health, viability, and parental effort. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 220-231.
7. Evans, C. S., Wenderoth, P., & Cheng, K. (2000). Detection of bilateral symmetry in complex biological images. Perception, 29, 31-42.
8. Forsman, A., & Herrstrom, J. (2004). Asymmetry in size, shape, and color impairs the protective value of conspicuous color patterns. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 141-147.
9. Forsman, A., & Merilaita, S. (1999). Fearful symmetry: Pattern size and asymmetry affects aposematic signal efficacy. Evolutionary Ecology, 13, 131-140.
10. Forsman, A., & Merilaita, S. (2003). Fearful symmetry? Intra-individual comparisons of asymmetry in cryptic vs. signalling colour patterns in butterflies. Evolutionary Ecology, 17, 491-507.
11. Jablonski, P. G., & Matyjasiak, P. (1997). Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) epaulette display depends on the degree of exposure but not symmetry of intruder's epaulettes. Behaviour, 134, 1115-1121.
12. Jablonski, P. G., & Matyjasiak, P. (2002). Male wing-patch asymmetry and aggressive response to intruders in the common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs). The Auk, 119, 566-572.
13. Jansson, L., Forkman, B., & Enquist, M. (2002). Experimental evidence of receiver bias for symmetry. Animal Behaviour, 63, 617-621.
14. Jones, J. S. (1987, January 22). An asymmetrical view of fitness. Nature, 325, 298-299.
15. Ligon, J. D., Kimball, R., & Merola-Zwartjes, M. (1998). Mate choice by female red junglefowl: The issues of multiple ornaments and fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 55, 41-50.
16. Ludwig, W. (1932). Das Rechts-Links Problem im Tierreich und beim Menschen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Mazzi, D., Kunzler, R., & Bakker, T. C. M. (2003). Female preference for symmetry in computer-animated threespined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 156-161.
18. Mazzi, D., Kunzler, R., Largiader, C. R., & Bakker, T. C. M. (2004). Inbreeding affects female preference for symmetry in computer-animated sticklebacks. Behavior Genetics, 34, 417-424.
19. Møller, A. P., & Höglund, J. (1991). Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: Implications for models of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 245, 1-5.
20. Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Morris, M. R., & Casey, K. (1998). Female swordtail fish prefer symmetrical sexual signals. Animal Behaviour, 55, 33-39.
22. Osorio, D. (1996). Symmetry detection by categorization of spatial phase, a model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263, 105-110.
23. Palmer, A. R., & Strobeck, C. (1986). Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematic, 17, 391-421.
24. Schlüter, A., Parzefall, J., & Schlupp, I. (1998). Female preference for symmetrical vertical bars in male sailfin mollies. Animal Behaviour, 56, 147-153.
25. Scognamillo, R., Rhodes, G., Morrone, C., & Burr, D. (2003). A feature-based model of symmetry detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 1727-1733.
26. Simmons, L. W., Rhodes, G., Peters, M., & Koehler, N. (2004). Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability? Behavioral Ecology, 15, 864-871.
27. Swaddle, J. P. (1999a). Is fluctuating asymmetry a visual signal? In Y. Espmark, T. Amundsen, & G. Rosenqvist (Eds.), Animal signals (pp. 155-175). Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.
28. Swaddle, J. P. (1999b). Limits to length asymmetry detection in starlings: Implications for biological signalling. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1299-1303.
29. Swaddle, J. P. (2003). Fluctuating asymmetry, animal behavior, and evolution. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 32, 169-205.
30. Swaddle, J. P. (2006). [A review of size asymmetries in North American and Australian birds]. Unpublished raw data.
31. Swaddle, J. P., Che, J. P., & Clelland, R. E. (2004). Symmetry preference as a cognitive by-product in starlings. Behaviour, 141, 469-478.
32. Swaddle, J. P., & Cuthill, I. C. (1994). Female zebra finches prefer males with symmetric chest plumage. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 258, 267-271.
33. Swaddle, J. P., & Pruett-Jones, S. (2001). Experimental investigation of the acquisition of learned symmetry discrimination in starlings. American Naturalist, 158, 300-307.
34. Swaddle, J. P., & Ruff, D. A. (2004). Starlings have difficulty detecting dot asymmetry: Implications for studying fluctuating asymmetry. Behaviour, 141, 29-40.
35. Swaddle, J. P., & Witter, M. S. (1995). Chest plumage, dominance and fluctuating asymmetry in female starlings. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 260, 219-223.
36. Tyler, C. W. (Ed.). (1996). Human symmetry perception and its computational analysis. Utrecht, Netherlands: VSP.
37. Uetz, G. W., & Smith, E. I. (1999). Asymmetry in a visual signaling character and sexual selection in a wolf spider. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45, 87-93.
38. Van Valen, L. (1962). A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution, 16, 125-162.
39. Wilson, H. R., & Wilkinson, F. (2002). Symmetry perception: A novel approach for biological shapes. Vision Research, 42, 589-597.
40. Zakharov, V. M. (1992). Population phenogenetics: Analysis of developmental stability in natural populations. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 191, 7-30.