Bilateral symmetry as an indicator of male quality in red-winged blackbirds: Associations with measures of health, viability, and parental effort

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 220-231

  Dufour, Kevin W ^a   Weatherhead, Patrick J ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agelaius phoeniceus; Bilateral symmetry; Body condition; Male quality; Nest defense; Parasitic infection; Red winged blackbird; Survival

Indexed keywords

BILATERAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE CHOICE; MALE QUALITY; MATE SELECTION;

ACARI; AGELAIUS; AGELAIUS PHOENICEUS; ANIMALIA; AVES; GALLIFORMES; PASSERIFORMES; PHTHIRAPTERA; TURDUS MERULA;

EID: 0031810668     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/9.3.220     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Atkinson CT, van Riper C III, 1991. Pathogenicity and epizootiology of avian haematozoa: Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon, and Haemoproteus. In: Bird-parasite interactions: ecology, evolution and behaviour (Loye JE, Zuk M, eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 19-48.
2. Bailey RC, Byrnes J, 1990. A new, old method for assessing measure- ment error in both univariate and multivariate morphometric studies. Syst Zool 39:124-130.
3. Bailey RO, 1979. Methods of estimating total lipid content in the red-head duck (Aythya americana) and an evaluation of condition indices. Can J Zool 57:1830-1833.
4. Balmford A, Jones IL, Thomas ALR, 1993. On avian asymmetry: evidence of natural selection for symmetrical tails and wings in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 252:245-251.
5. Balmford A, Thomas ALR, 1992. Swallowing ornamental asymmetry. Nature 359:487.
6. Beletsky LD, Orians GH, 1987. Territoriality among male red-winged blackbirds I. Site fidelity and movement patterns. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:21-34.
7. Bennett GF, 1970. Simple techniques for making avian blood smears. Can J Zool 48:585-586.
8. Blem CR, 1990. Avian energy storage. In: Current ornithology, vol 7 (Power DM, ed). New York: Plenum Press; 59-113.
9. Borgia G, Wilkinson G, 1992. Swallowing ornamental asymmetry. Nature 359:487-488.
10. Burke T, 1989. DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success. Trends Ecol Evol 4:139-144.
11. Burke T, Bruford MW, 1987. DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature 327:149-152.
12. Clayton DH, 1991a. Coevolution of avian grooming and ectoparasite avoidance. In: Bird-parasite interactions: ecology, evolution and behaviour (Loye JE, Zuk M, eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 258-289.
13. Clayton DH, 1991b. The influence of parasites on host sexual selection. Parasitology Today 7:329-334.
14. Clayton DH, Tompkins DM, 1994. Ectoparasite virulence is linked to mode of transmission. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:211-217.
15. DeVaney JA, Quisenberry JH, Doran BH, Bradley JW, 1980. Dispersal of the northern fowl mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Canestrini and Fanzago), and the chicken body louse, Menacanthus stramineus (Nitzsch), among thirty strains of egg-type hens in a caged laying house. Poultry Sci 59:1745-1749.
16. Dufour KW, 1996. Symmetry, quality, and sexual success in male red-winged blackbirds (PhD thesis). Ottawa: Carleton University.
17. Dufour KW, Weatherhead PJ, 1996. Estimation of organism-wide asymmetry in red-winged blackbirds and its relation to studies of mate selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:769-775.
18. Dufour KW, Weatherhead PJ, 1998a. Bilateral symmetry and social dominance in captive male red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, in press.
19. Dufour KW, Weatherhead PJ, 1998b. Reproductive consequences of bilateral asymmetry for individual male red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol 9:232-242.
20. Eckert CG, Weatherhead PJ, 1987a. Competition for territories in red-winged blackbirds: is resource-holding potential realized? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:369-375.
21. Eckert CG, Weatherhead PJ, 1987b. Ideal dominance distributions: a test using red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:43-52.
22. Eckert CG, Weatherhead PJ, 1987c. Male characteristics, parental quality and the study of mate choice in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:35-42.
23. Evans MR, 1993. Fluctuating asymmetry and long tails: the mechanical effects of asymmetry may act to enforce honest advertisement. Proc R Soc Lond B 253:205-209.
24. Evans MR, Hatchwell BJ, 1993. New slants on ornament asymmetry. Proc R Soc Lond B 251:171-177.
25. Evans MR, Martins TLF, Haley MP, 1994. The asymmetrical cost of tail elongation in red-billed streamertails. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:97-103.
26. Evans MR, Martins TLF, Haley MP, 1995. Inter- and intra-sexual patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in the red-billed streamertail: should symmetry always increase with ornament size? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:15-23.
27. Fowler JA, Cohen S, 1983. A method for the quantitative collection of ectoparasites from birds. Ringing Migration 4:185-189.
28. Freeman S, Jackson WM, 1990. Univariate metrics are not adequate to measure avian body size. Auk 107:69-74.
29. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, 1997. Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In: Evolutionary social psychology (Simpson JA, Kenrick DT, eds). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 169-195.
30. Gibbs HL, Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT, White BN, Tabak LM, Hoysak DJ, 1990. Realized reproductive success of polygynous red-winged blackbirds revealed by DNA markers. Science 250:1394-1397.
31. Gray EM, 1996. Female control of offspring paternity in a western population of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:267-278.
32. Hagen DW, 1973. Inheritance of numbers of lateral plates and gill rakers in Gasterosteus aculeatus. Heredity 30:303-312.
33. Harvey IF, Walsh KJ, 1993. Fluctuating asymmetry and lifetime mating success are correlated in males of the damselfly Coenagrion puella (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Ecol Entomol 18:198-202.
34. Hoysak DJ, Weatherhead PJ, 1991. Sampling blood from birds: a technique and assessment of its effect. Condor 93:746-752.
35. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL, 1985a. Hypervariable 'minisatellite' regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67-73.
36. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL, 1985b. Individual specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA. Nature 316:76-79.
37. Johnson DH, Krapu GL, Reinecke KJ, Jorde DG, 1985. An evaluation of condition indices for birds. J Wildl Manage 49:569-575.
38. Leary RF, Allendorf FW, 1989. Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress: implications for conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 4:214-217.
39. Liggett AC, Harvey IF, Manning JT, 1993. Fluctuating asymmetry in Scatophaga stercoraria L.: successful males are more symmetrical. Anim Behav 45:1041-1043.
40. Manning JT, Hartley MA, 1991. Symmetry and ornamentation are correlated in the peacock's train. Anim Behav 42:1020-1021.
41. Markow TA, 1995. Evolutionary ecology and developmental stability. Annu Rev Entomol 40:105-120.
42. Markow TA, Ricker JP, 1992. Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of three Drosophila species. Heredity 69:122-127.
43. Marshall AG, 1981. The ecology of ectoparasitic insects. London: Academic Press.
44. Martin JEH, 1977. The insects and arachnids of Canada, part I: collecting, preparing, and preserving insects, mites, and spiders. Ottawa: Biosystematics Research Institute.
45. Mather K, 1953. Genetical control of stability in development. Heredity 7:297-336.
46. McLachlan A, Cant M, 1995. Small males are more symmetrical: mating success in the midge Chironomus plumosus L. (Diptera: Chironomidae). Anim Behav 50:841-846.
47. Møller AP, 1990a. Effects of a haematophagous mite on the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica): a test of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis. Evolution 44:771-784.
48. Møller AP, 1990b. Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim Behav 40:1185-1187.
49. Møller AP, 1992. Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature 357:238-240.
50. Møller AP, 1993. Female preference for apparently symmetrical male sexual ornaments in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:371-376.
51. Møller AP, 1994. Sexual selection in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) IV. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry and selection against asymmetry. Evolution 48:658-670.
52. Møller AP, 1996. Sexual selection, viability selection, and developmental stability in the domestic fly Musca domestica. Evolution 50:746-752.
53. Møller AP, Hoglund J, 1991. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: implications for models of sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 245:1-5.
54. Møller AP, Pomiankowski A, 1993. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Genetica 89:267-279.
55. Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ, 1988. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167-187.
56. Naugler CT, Leech SM, 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry and survival ability in the forest tent caterpillar moth Malacosoma disstria: implications for pest management. Entomol Exp Appl 70:295-298.
57. Orians GH, 1980. Some adaptations of marsh-nesting blackbirds. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
58. Orians GH, Beletsky LD, 1989. Red-winged blackbird. In: Lifetime reproduction in birds (Newton I, ed). London: Academic Press; 183-197.
59. Packer C, Pusey AE, 1993. Should a lion change its spots? Nature 362:595.
60. Palmer AR, 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. In: Developmental stability: its origins and evolutionary implications (Markow TA, ed). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 335-364.
61. Palmer AR, Strobeck C, 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:391-421.
62. Palmer AR, Strobeck C, 1992. Fluctuating asymmetry as a measure of developmental stability: implications of non-normal distributions and power of statistical tests. Acta Zool Fenn 191:57-72.
63. Parsons PA, 1990. Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress. Biol Rev 65:131-145.
64. Parsons PA, 1992. Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. Heredity 68:361-364.
65. Pimentel RA, 1979. Morphometrics: the multivariate analysis of biological data. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
66. Polak M, 1993. Parasites increase fluctuating asymmetry of male Drosophila nigrospiracula: implications for sexual selection. Genetica 89:255-265.
67. Polak M, Trivers R, 1994. The science of symmetry in biology. Trends Ecol Evol 9:122-124.
68. Radesater T, Halldorsdottir H, 1993. Fluctuating asymmetry and forceps size in earwigs, Forficula auricularia. Anim Behav 45:626-628.
69. Read AF, 1990. Parasites and the evolution of host sexual behaviour. In: Parasitism and host behaviour (Bernard CJ, Behnke JM, eds). London: Taylor and Francis; 117-157.
70. Ringelman JK, Szymczak MR, 1985. A physiological condition index for wintering mallards. J Wildl Manage 49:564-568.
71. Ryan MJ, Warkentin KM, McClelland BE, Wilczynski W, 1995. Fluctuating asymmetries and advertisement call variation in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans. Behav Ecol 6:124-131.
72. SAS Institute, 1994. JMP statistics and graphics guide. Gary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.
73. Searcy WA, 1979a. Female choice of mates: a general model for birds and its application to red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Am Nat 114:77-100.
74. Searcy WA, 1979b. Male characteristics and pairing success in red-winged blackbirds. Auk 96:353-363.
75. Searcy WA, 1979c. Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male red-winged blackbirds. Condor 81:417-420.
76. Searcy WA, 1979d. Sexual selection and body size in male red-winged blackbirds. Evolution 33:649-661.
77. Searcy WA, Yasukawa K, 1995. Polygyny and sexual selection in red-winged blackbirds. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
78. Shin HS, Bargiello TA, Clark BT, Jackson FR, Young MW, 1985. An unusual coding sequence from a Drosophila clock gene is conserved in vertebrates. Nature 317:445-448.
79. Shutler D, Weatherhead PJ, 1991. Owner and floater red-winged blackbirds: determinants of status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:234-241.
80. Shutler D, Weatherhead PJ, 1994. Movement patterns and territory acquisition by male red-winged blackbirds. Can J Zool 72:712-720.
81. Simmons LW, 1995. Correlates of male quality in the field cricket, Gryllus campestris L.: age, size, and symmetry determine pairing success in field populations. Behav Ecol 6:376-381.
82. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ, 1981. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
83. Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC, 1994a. Female zebra finches prefer males with symmetric chest plumage. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:267-271.
84. Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC, 1994b. Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches. Nature 367:165-166.
85. Swaddle JP, Witter MS, 1994. Food, feathers, and fluctuating asymmetries. Proc R Soc Lond B 255:147-152.
86. Swaddle JP, Witter MS, Cuthill IC, 1994. The analysis of fluctuating asymmetry. Anim Behav 48:986-989.
87. Thornhill R, 1992a. Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japonica: Mecoptera). Behav Ecol 3:277-283.
88. Thornhill R, 1992b. Fluctuating asymmetry and the mating system of the Japanese scorpionfly Panorpa japonica. Anim Behav 44:867-879.
89. Thornhill R, Sauer P, 1992. Genetic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly. Anim Behav 43:255-264.
90. Tomkins JL, Simmons LW, 1995. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in earwig forceps: no evidence for reliable signalling. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:89-96.
91. Ueno H, 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry in relation to two fitness components, adult longevity and male mating success in a ladybird beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Ecol Entomol 19:87-88.
92. Watson PJ, Thornhill R, 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 9:21-25.
93. Weatherhead PJ, 1990. Nest defence as shareable paternal care in red-winged blackbirds. Anim Behav 39:1173-1178.
94. Weatherhead PJ, 1995. Effects on female reproductive success of familiarity and experience among male red-winged blackbirds. Anim Behav 49:967-976.
95. Weatherhead PJ, Bennett GF, 1991. Ecology of red-winged blackbird parasitism by haematozoa. Can J Zool 69:2352-2359.
96. Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT, 1995. Pair and extra-pair mating success relative to male quality in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:81-91.
97. Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT, 1997. Genetic estimates of annual and lifetime reproductive success in male red-winged blackbirds. Ecology 78:884-896.
98. Weatherhead PJ, Hoysak DJ, 1984. Dominance structuring of a red-winged blackbird roost. Auk 101:551-555.
99. Weatherhead PJ, Metz KJ, Bennett GF, Irwin RE, 1993. Parasite faunas, testosterone and secondary sexual traits in male red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:13-23.
100. Weatherhead PJ, Montgomerie R, Gibbs HL, Boag PT, 1994. The cost of extra-pair fertilizations to female red-winged blackbirds. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:315-320.
101. Westneat DF, 1990. Genetic parentage in the indigo bunting: a study using DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:67-76.
102. Westneat DF, 1993. Polygyny and extrapair fertilizations in eastern red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol 4:49-60.
103. Yezerinac SM, Lougheed SC, Handford P, 1992. Measurement error and morphometric studies: statistical power and observer experience. Syst Biol 41:471-482.
104. Zakharov VM, 1992. Population phenogenetics: analysis of developmental stability in natural populations. Acta Zool Fenn 191:7-30.