MtDNA phylogeny provides evidence of generic polyphyleticism for East Asian bagrid catfishes

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 579, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 147-159

  Ku, Xiying ^a,b   Peng, Zuogang ^a   Diogo, Rui ^c   He, Shunping ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF HYDROBIOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bagridae; Cytochrome b; Molecular phylogeny; Siluriformes; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

DNA; ENZYME KINETICS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; PLANTS (BOTANY);

BAGRIDAE; CYTOCHROME B; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; SILURIFORMES; TAXONOMY;

BIODIVERSITY;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CLADISTICS; CYTOCHROME; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; RELATEDNESS; TAXONOMY; TELEOST;

BAGRIDAE; BARBUS; HEMIBAGRUS; LEIOCASSIS; PELTEOBAGRUS; PELTEOBAGRUS NITIDUS; PELTEOBAGRUS VACHELLII; PSEUDOBAGRUS; PSEUDOBAGRUS USSURIENSIS; SILURIFORMES;

EID: 33846996402     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-006-0401-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Avise, J. C., 1994. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Chapman & Hall, New York.
2. Chu, X., B. Zhen & D. Dai, 1999. Fauna Sinica, Class Teleostei, Siluriformes. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
3. Dai, F., 1998. Studies on isozymes, skeleton characters of eight bagrid catfishes and comments on phylogenetic relationship (Siluriformes: Bagridae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 23: 432-439 (in Chinese).
4. Diogo, R., 2003. Higher-level phylogeny of Siluriformes: an overview. In Kapoor, B. G., G. Arratia, M. Chardon & R. Diogo (eds), Catfishes. Science Publishers, Enfield, 353-384.
5. Diogo, R., 2004. Morphological evolution, aptations, homoplasies, constraints, and evolutionary trends: catfishes as a case study on general phylogeny and macroevolution. Science Publishers, Enfield, USA.
6. Diogo, R., P. Vandewalle & M. Chardon, 1999. Morphological description of the cephalic region of Bagrus docmak, with a reflection on Bagridae (Teleostei: Siluriformes) autapomorphies. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 49: 207-232.
7. Galtier, N., M. Gouy & C. Gautier, 1996. SEAVIEW and PHYLOWIN: Two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Computer Applications in Biosciences 12: 543-548.
8. Goropashnaya, A. V., B. Fedorov, B. Seifert & P. Pamilos, 2004a. Recent speciation in the Formica rufa group ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): inference from mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 198-206.
9. Goropashnaya, A. V., B. Fedorov, B. Seifert & P. Pamilos, 2004b. Limited phylogeographical structure across Eurasia in two red wood ant species Formica pratensis and F. lugubris (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Molecular Ecology 13: 1849-1858.
10. Guindon, S & O. Gascuel, 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696-704.
11. Hardman, M., 2005. The phylogenetic relationships among non-diplomystid catfishes as inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences; the search for the ictalurid sister taxon (Otophysi: Siluriformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 700-720.
12. Jayaram, K. C., 1968. Contributions to the study of bagrid fishes (Siluroidae: Bagridae) III. A systematic account of the Japanese, Chinese, Malayan and Indonesian genera. Treubia 27: 287-386.
13. Kishino, H. & M. Hasegawa, 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29: 170-179.
14. Kumar, S., K. Tamura, I. B. Jakobsen & M. Nei, 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolution genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17: 1244-1245.
15. vanOppen, M. J. H., J. M. Brenda., B. L. Willis & D. J. Miller, 2001. The evolutionary history of the Corals genus Acropora (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) based on a mitochondrial and a nuclear marker: reticulation, incomplete lineage sorting, or morphological convergence? Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 1315-1329.
16. Maeda, H., K. Watanabe & Y. Taki, 1994. Genetic relationships of the Japanese bagrid catfishes. Journal of the Tokyo University Fisheries 81: 111-121.
17. Mo, T., 1991. Anatomy, relationships and systematics of the Bagridae (Teleostei: Siluroidei), with a hypothesis of Siluroid phylogeny. Theses Zoologicae 17, Koenigstein: Koeltz scientific Books.
18. Ng, H. H., 2003. Phylogeny and systematics of Bagridae. In Kapoor B.G., G. Arratia, M. Chardon & R. Diogo (eds), Catfishes. Science Publishers, Enfield, 439-463.
19. Okazaki, T., Sang-Rin Jeon, M. Watanabe & T. Kitagawa, 1999. Genetic relationships of Japanese and Korean bagrid catfishes inferred from mitochondrial DNA analysis. Zoological Science 16: 363-373.
20. Peng, Z., S. He & Y. Zhang, 2002. Mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence variations and phylogeny of East Asian bagrid catfishes. Progress in Natural Science 12: 421-425.
21. Peng, Z., Y. Zhang., S. He & Y. Chen, 2005. Phylogeny of Chinese catfishes inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence. Acta Genetica Sinica 32: 145-154.
22. Posada, D. & K. A. Crandall, 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
23. Razafimandimbison, S. G., J. Moog, H. Lantz, U. Maschwitz & B. Bremer, 2005. Re-assessment of monophyly, evolution of myrmecophytism, and rapid radiation in Neonauclea s.s. (Rubiaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34: 334-354.
24. Regan, C. T., 1911. The classification of teleostean fishes of the order Ostariophysi α. Siluroidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, London 8: 553-577.
25. Ronquist, F & J. P. Huelsenbeck, 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
26. Swofford, D. L., 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
27. Templeton, A. R., 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonucleotide cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
28. Teugels, G. G., 2003. State of the art of recent siluriform systematics. In Kapoor, B. G., G. Arratia, M. Chardon & R. Diogo (eds), Catfishes. Science Publishers, Enfield, 317-352.
29. Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson & F. Plewnink, 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequences alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882.
30. Tilak, R., 1965. The osteocranium and the Weberian apparatus of the fishes of the family Bagridae (Pisces: Siluroidei). Morphologisches Jahrbuch 107: 415-443.
31. Watanabe, K. & T. Uyeno, 1999. Fossil bagrid catfishes from Japan and their zoogeography, with description of a new species, Pseudobagrus ikiensis. Ichthyological Research 46: 397-412.
32. Xiao, W., Y. Zhang & H. Liu, 2001. Molecular systematics of Xenocyprinae (Teleostei: Cyprinidae): taxonomy, biogeography and coevolution of a special group restricted in East Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 473-484.
33. Yang, Z., 1994. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 105-111.
34. Zwickl, D. J. & D. H. Hillis, 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Systematic Biology 51: 588-598.