Discrimination between benign and malignant prostate tissue using chromatin texture analysis in 3-D by confocal laser scanning microscopy

Prostate

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 248-254

  Huisman, André ^a   Ploeger, Lennert S ^a   Dullens, Hub F J ^a   Jonges, Trudy N ^a   Belien, Jeroen A M ^b   Meijer, Gerrit A ^b   Poulin, Neal ^a   Grizzle, William E ^c   Van Diest, Paul J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

Author keywords

3 D; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; DNA ploidy; Image analysis; Prostate cancer; Texture features

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN TEXTURE ANALYSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; PLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CANCER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADENOCARCINOMA; CHROMATIN; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DNA, NEOPLASM; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PLOIDIES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33846988928     PISSN: 02704137     EISSN: 10970045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20507     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Zink D, Fischer AH, Nickerson JA. Nuclear structure in cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:677-687.
2. Mommers EC, Poulin N, Meijer CJ, Baak JP, van Diest PJ. Malignancy-associated changes in breast tissue detected by image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 2000;20:187-195.
3. Bergers E, Baak JP, van Diest PJ, Willig AJ, Los J, Peterse JL, Ruitenberg HM, Schapers RF, Somsen JG, van Beek MW, Bellot SM, Fijnheer J, van Gorp LH. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy using flow cytometry in 1301 breast cancer patients: Results of the prospective Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project. Mod Pathol 1997;10:762-768.
4. Veltri RW, Partin AW, Miller MC. Quantitative nuclear grade (QNG): A new image analysis-based biomarker of clinically relevant nuclear structure alterations. J Cell Biochem Suppl 2000;Suppl 35:151-157.
5. Guillaud M, Doudkine A, Garner D, Macaulay C, Palcic B. Malignancy associated changes in cervical smears: Systematic changes in cytometric features with the grade of dysplasia. Anal Cell Pathol 1995;9:191-204.
6. Bartels PH, Montironi R, Hamilton PW, Thompson D, Vaught L, Bartels HG. Nuclear chromatin texture in prostatic lesions. I. PIN and adenocarcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1998;20:389-396.
7. Bartels PH, Montironi R, Hamilton PW, Thompson D, Vaught L, Bartels HG. Nuclear chromatin texture in prostatic lesions. II. PIN and malignancy associated changes. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1998;20:397-406.
8. Palcic B. Nuclear texture: Can it be used as a surrogate endpoint biomarker? J Cell Biochem Suppl 1994;19:40-46.
9. Bartels PH. Computer-generated diagnosis and image analysis. An overview. Cancer 1992;69:1636-1638.
10. Veltri RW, Khan MA, Miller MC, Epstein JI, Mangold LA, Walsh PC, Partin AW. Ability to predict metastasis based on pathology findings and alterations in nuclear structure of normal-appearing and cancer peripheral zone epithelium in the prostate. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3465-3473.
11. Verhagen PC, Tilanus MG, de Weger RA, van Moorselaar RJ, van den Tweel JG, Boon TA. Prognostic factors in localised prostate cancer with emphasis on the application of molecular techniques. Eur Urol 2002;41:363-371.
12. Mairinger T, Gschwendtner A. Nuclear chromatin texture analysis of nonmalignant tissue can detect adjacent prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostate 1999;41:12-19.
13. Tekola P, Baak JP, van Ginkel HA, Belien JA, van Diest PJ, Broeckaert MA, Schuurmans LT. Three-dimensional confocal laser scanning DNA ploidy cytometry in thick histological sections. J Pathol 1996;180:214-222.
14. Belien JA, van Ginkel AH, Tekola P, Ploeger LS, Poulin NM, Baak JP, van Diest PJ. Confocal DNA cytometry: A contour-based segmentation algorithm for automated three-dimensional image segmentation. Cytometry 2002;49:12-21.
15. Ploeger LS, Belien JA, Poulin NM, Grizzle W, van Diest PJ. Confocal 3D DNA cytometry: Assessment of required coefficient of variation by computer simulation. Cell Oncol 2004;26:93-99.
16. Ploeger LS, Huisman A, van der GJ, van der Giezen DM, Belien JA, Abbaker AY, Dullens HF, Grizzle W, Poulin NM, Meijer GA, van Diest PJ. Implementation of accurate and fast DNA cytometry by confocal microscopy in 3D. Cell Oncol 2005;27:225-230.
17. Huisman A, Ploeger LS, Dullens HF, Poulin N, Grizzle WE, van Diest PJ. Development of 3D chromatin texture analysis using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cell Oncol 2005;27:335-345.
18. Suzuki T, Fujikura K, Higashiyama T, Takata K. DNA staining for fluorescence and laser confocal microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 1997;45:49-53.
19. Ploeger LS, Gugten J, van der Giezen D, Belien JA, Abbaker A, Dullens HFJ, Huisman A, Grizzle W, Poulin N, van Diest PJ. Implementation of routine confocal DNA cytometry of clinical samples in 3D. Cell Oncol 2005;27:152.
20. Haroske G, Baak JP, Danielsen H, Giroud F, Gschwendtner A, Oberholzer M, Reith A, Spieler P, Bocking A. Fourth updated ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 2001;23:89-95.
21. Doudkine A, Macaulay C, Poulin N, Palcic B. Nuclear texture measurements in image cytometry. Pathologica 1995;87:286-299.
22. Metzler V, Palm C, Lehmann T, Aach T. Texture Classification of Graylevel Images by Multiscale Cross-Cooccurrence Matrices. 2000. p 2549.
23. Chaudhuri BB, Sarkar N. Texture segmentation using fractal dimension. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 2005;17:72-77.
24. Bartels PH, da Silva VD, Montironi R, Hamilton PW, Thompson D, Vaught L, Bartels HG. Chromatin texture signatures in nuclei from prostate lesions. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1998;20:407-416.
25. Schrader M, Bahlmann K, Giese G, Hell SW. 4Pi-confocal imaging in fixed biological specimens. Biophys J 1998;75:1659-1668.
26. Markham J, Conchello JA. Artefacts in restored images due to intensity loss in three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy. J Microsc-Oxf 2001;204:93-98.