Renal transplant: Color duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of the early postoperative phase and surgical complications;Die transplantatniere: Farbkodierte duplex-sonographie und kontrastmittelverstärkte sonographie in der beurteilung nephrologischer und chirurgischer komplikationen

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 178, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1202-1211

  Fischer, Thomas ^a   Filimonow, S ^a   Mutze, S ^b   Morgera, S ^a   Thomas, A ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNFALLKRANKENHAUS BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Color duplex ultrasound; Contrast agent; Kidney transplant

Indexed keywords

COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; MICROBUBBLE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; ECHOGRAPHY; GRAFT REJECTION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; TIME; VASCULARIZATION;

CONTRAST AGENT BR1; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; PHOSPHOLIPID; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GRAFT REJECTION; HEMATOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY DISEASES; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MICROBUBBLES; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SOFTWARE; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR;

EID: 33846984260     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926979     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Dickenmann M, Gurke L Kidney transplantation. Ther Umsch 2005; 62: 443-447
2. Schnuelle P, Lorenz D, Trede M et al. Impact of renal cadaveric transplantation on survival in end-stage renal failure: evidence for reduced mortality risk compared with hemodialysis during long-term follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9: 2135-2141
3. Winkelmayer WC, Weinstein MC, Mittleman MA et al. Health economic evaluations: the special case of end-stage renal disease treatment. Med Decis Making 2002; 22: 417-430
4. Niu SF, Li IC. Quality of life of patients having renal replacement therapy. J Adv Nurs 2005; 51: 15-21 5 Bittencourt ZZ, Alves Filho G, Mazzali M et al. Quality of life in renal transplant patients: impact of a functioning graft. Rev Saude Publica 2004; 38: 732-734
5. Diethelm AG, Deierhoi MH, Hudson SL et al. Progress in renal transplantation. A single center study of 3359 patients over 25 years. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 446-458
6. Lee HM, Posner MP, King AL et al. Status of long-term (25 years) survival of kidney transplant patients. Transplant Proc 1993; 25: 1336-1337
7. Angaben der "Deutschen Stiftung Organspende", http://www.dso.de.
8. Alvarez G, Gonzalez-Molina M, Cabello M et al. Pulsed and continuous Doppler evaluation of renal dysfunction after kidney transplantation. Eur J Radiol 1991; 12: 108-112
9. Arima M, Ogino T, Hosokawa S et al. Functional image diagnosis of kidney transplants using ultrasonic Doppler flowmetry and magnetic resonance imaging. Transplant Proc 1989; 21: 1907-1911
10. De-Gaetano AM, Boldrini G, Nanni G et al. Noninvasive surveillance of allografted kidneys by ultrasonic duplex scanning. Angiology 1989; 40: 705-715
11. Flückner F, Steiner H, Horn S et al. Farbkodierte Duplexsonographie and Widerstandsindex bei Nierentransplantaten mit Dysfunktion. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1990; 153: 692-697
12. Grenier N, Douws C, Morel D et al. Detection of vascular complications in renal allografts with color Doppler flow imaging. Radiology 1991; 178: 217-223
13. Hollenbeck M. New diagnostic techniques in clinical nephrology. Colour coded duplex sonography of renal transplants - tool or toy for the nephrologist? Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994; 9: 1822-1828
14. Steinberg HV, Nelson RC, Murphy FB et al. Renal allograft rejection: evaluation by Doppler US and MR Imaging. Radiology 1987; 162: 337-342
15. Radermacher J, Mengel M, Ellis S et al. The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 182-184
16. Restrepo-Schafer IK, Schwerk WB, Muller TF et al. Intrarenal doppler flow analysis in patients with kidney transplantation and stable transplant function. Ultraschall Med 1999; 20: 87-92
17. Letourneau JG, Day DL, Feinberg SB. Ultrasound and computed tomographic evaluation of renal transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am 1987; 25: 267-279
18. Townsend RR, Tomlanowich SJ, Goldstein RB et al. Combined Doppler and morphologic sonographic evaluation of renal transplant rejection. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9: 199-206
19. Weskott HP. Power US: Phantom measurement of slow flow. Radiology 1995; 197: 337
20. Waiser J, Schreiber M, Budde K et al. Prognostic value of the Banff classification. Transpl Int 2000; 13: 106-111
21. Bude RO, Rubin JM, Adler ED. Power versus conventionel color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of normal intrarenal vasculature. Radiology 1994; 192: 777-780
22. Genkins SM, Sanfilippo FP, Caroll BA. Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: Lack of sensitivity and specificity in establishing pathologic diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol 1989; 152: 535-539
23. Hollenbeck M, Hilbert N, Meusel F et al. Increasing sensitivity and specificity of Doppler sonographic detection of renal transplant rejection with serialinvestigation technique. Clin Investig 1994; 72: 609-615
24. Phillips AO, Deane C, O'Donnell P et al. Evaluation of Doppler ultrasound in primary non-function of renal transplants. Clin Transplant 1994; 8: 83-86
25. Rigsby CM, Burns PM, Weltin GG et al. Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1987; 162: 39-42
26. Mallek R, Mostbeck G, Kain R et al. Vaskuläre Nierentransplantatabstoßung - Ist eine duplexsonographische Diagnose möglich? Fortschr Röntgenstr 1990; 152: 283
27. Hollenbeck M, Stuhrmann M, Trapp R et al. Farbkodierte Dopplersonographie zur Früherkennung von Abstoßungsreaktionen nach allogener Nierentransplantation. Dtsch med Wochenschr 1994; 116: 921-927
28. Tanaka T, Kyo M, Kokado et al. Correlation between the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft biopsies and clinical outcome. Transpl Int 2004; 17: 59-64
29. Pizzolitto S, Boscutti G, Falconieri G et al. Clinicopathologic correlations in acute renal graft rejection. G Ital Nefrol 2004; 21: 19-27
30. Pozniak MA, Dodd GD, Kelcz F. Ultrasonographic evaluation of renal transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30: 1053-1066
31. Fahlenkamp D, Schönberger B, Lindeke A et al. Laparoskopische Lymphozelendrainage nach Nierentransplantation. Z Urologie 1993; 2: 55-56
32. Benoit G, Bensadoun H, Jardin A. Surgical complications of kidney transplantation. European Urology Update Series 1993; 2: 178-183
33. Martinoli C, Bertolotto M, Crespi G et al. Duplex Doppler analysis of interlobular arteries in transplanted kidneys. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 765-769
34. Takano R, Ando Y, Taniguchi N et al. Power Doppler sonography of the kidney: effect of Valsalva's maneuver. J Clin Ultrasound 2001; 29: 384-390
35. Schwerk WB, Restrepo IK, Prinz H. Semiquantitative analysis of intrarenal arterial Doppler flow spectra in healthy adults. Ultraschall Med 1993; 14: 117-122
36. Delbeke D, Sacks GA, Sandler MP. Diagnosis of allograft renal vein thrombosis. Clin Nucl Med 1989; 14: 415-420
37. Duckett T, Bretan PN, Cochran ST. Noninvasive radiological diagnosis of renal vein thrombosis in renal transplantation. J Urol 1991; 46: 403-406
38. Laplante S, Patriquin HB, Robitaille P et al. Renal vein thrombosis in children: evidence of early flow recovery with Doppler US. Radiology 1993; 189: 37-42
39. Deane C, Cowan N, Giles J et al. Arteriovenous fistulas in renal transplants: color Doppler ultrasound observations. Urol Radiol 1992; 13: 211-217
40. Birkeland SA, Rohr N, Elbirk A et al. Chronic rejection in kidney transplant patients receiving cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with acyclovir. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 2040-2041
41. Jordan ML, Cook GT, Cardelle CJ. Ten years of experience with vascular complications in renal transplants. J Urol 1982; 128: 689-692
42. Griffin JF, McNicholas MM. Morphological appearance of renal allografts in transplant failure. J Clin Ultrasound 1992; 20: 529-537
43. Jansen O, Rob PM, Schmidtke V et al. Follow-up study of renal transplants by duplex Doppler and grey scaleultrasound. Eur J Radiol 1992; 15: 26-31
44. Renowden SA, Blethyn J, Cochlin DL. Renal transplant sonography: correlation of Doppler and biopsy results in cellular rejection. Clin Radiol 1992; 46: 265-269
45. Blane CE, Gagnadoux MF, Brunelle F et al. Doppler ultrasonography in the early postoperative evaluation of renal transplants in children. Can Assoc Radiol J 1993; 44: 176-178
46. Saarinen O. Diagnostic value of resistive index of renal transplants in the early postoperative period. Acta Radiol 1991; 32: 166-169
47. Saarinen O, Salmela K, Edgren J. Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of renal transplant artery stenosis-value of resistive index. Acta Radiol 1994; 35: 586-589
48. Baxter GM, Ireland H, Moss JG et al. Colour Doppler ultrasound in renal transplant artery stenosis: which Doppler index? Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 618-622
49. Häyry P, Yilmaz S. Chronic allograft rejection: An update. Transplant Proc 1994; 26: 3159-3160
50. Bude RO, Rubin JM, Adler RD. Power versus conventional color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of normal intrarenal vasculature. Radiology 1994; 192: 777-780
51. Mutze S, Overhoff M, Filimonow S et al. Ultraschalldiagnostik der Transplantatniere. Radiologe 1996; 36: 31-37
52. Pallardó LM, Sánchez J, Puig N et al. Chronic rejection in 500 kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine: incidence and risk factors. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 2215-2216
53. Fischer T, Mühler M, Kröncke TJ et al. Early Postoperative Ultrasound of Kidney Transplants: Evaluation of Contrast Medium Dynamics Using Time-intensity Curves. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 472-477
54. Pudszuhn A, Marx C, Malich A et al. Computerassistierte Quantifizierungsanalyse der kontrastmittelverstärkten Powerdoppler- Sonographie bei unklaren Herdbefunden der Mamma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 495-501
55. Dietrich CF. Kontrastverstärkte 3D-Bildgebung unter Echtzeitbedingungen, eine neue Technik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 160-163
56. Hohmann J, SkrokJ, Puls R et al. Charakterisierung fokaler Leberläsionen mit kontrastmittelgestütztem "low MI real time" Ultraschall und SonoVue. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003 ; 175: 835-843
57. Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Calderan L et al. US characterization of focal hepatic lesions with intermittent high-acoustic-power mode and contrast material. Acad Radiol 2003; 10: 739-750
58. Basilico R, Blomley MJ, Harvey CJ et al. Which continuous US scanning mode is optimal for the detection of vascularity in liver lesions when enhanced with a second generation contrast agent? Eur J Radiol 2002; 41: 184-191
59. Schlosser T, Pohl C, Veltmann C. Feasibility of the flash-replenishment concept in renal tissue: which parameters affect the assessment of the contrast replenishment? Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 937-944
60. Wei K, Le E, Bin JP et al. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1135-1140
61. Girard MS, Mattrey RF, Baker KG et al. Comparison of Standard and Second Harmonic B-mode Sonography in the Detection of Segmental Renal Infarction with SonographicContrast in a Rabbit Model. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 185-192
62. Nilsson A. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys. Eur Radiol 2004; Vol 14/Suppl 8/October 2004: 104-109
63. Bokor D, Chambers JB, Rees PJ et al. Clinical safety of SonoVue, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Invest Radiol 2001; 36: 104-109
64. Correas JM, Claudon M, Tranquart F et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: renal applications. J Radiol 2003; 84: 2041-2054
65. Lucidarme O, Franchi-Abella S, Correas JM et al. Blood flow quantification with contrast-enhanced US: "entrance in the section" phenomenon-phantom and rabbit study. Radiology 2003; 228: 298-299
66. Nahar T, Li P, Kuersten B et al. Detection of resting myocardial perfusion defects by SonoVue myocardial contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography 2003; 20: 511-517
67. Schlosser T, Veltmann C, Lohmaier S et al. Bestimmung des renalen Blutflusses in Makro- und Mikrozirkulation mittels Pulse Inversion Imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 724-730
68. Bouakaz A, Krenning BJ, Vletter WB et al. Contrast superharmonic imaging: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 547-553
69. Robbin ML, Lockhart ME, Barr RG. Renal imaging with ultrasound contrast: current status. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41: 963-978
70. Krix M, Kauczor HU, Delorme S. Quantification of tissue perfusion with novel ultrasound methods. Radiologe 2003; 43: 823-830
71. Pollard RE, Sadlowski AR, Bloch SH et al. Contrast-assisted destruction-replenishment ultrasound for the assessment of tumor microvasculature in a rat model. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2002; 1: 459-470
72. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound - induced destruction of microbubbles administered as aconstant venous infusion. Circulation 1998; 97: 473-483
73. Fischer T, Dieckhöfer J, Mühler M et al. The use of contrast-enhanced US in renal transplant: first results and potential clinical benefit. Eur Radiol 2005; Vol 15/Suppl 5/December 2005, ECR 2005, Vienna, Austria: E109-116
74. Argalia G, Cacciamani L, Fazi R et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparison with MR-angiography. Radiol Med 2004; 107: 208-217
75. Blebea J, Zickler R, Volteas N et al. Duplex imaging of the renal arteries with contrast enhancement. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2003; 37: 429-436
76. Teixeira OU, Bortolotto LA, Siva HB. The contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound with perfluorocarbon exposed sonicated albumin does not improve the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis compared with angiography. J Negat Results Biomed 2004; 3: 3
77. Siracusano S, Quaia E, Bertolotto M et al. The application of ultrasound contrast agents in the charcterization of renal tumors. World J Urol 2004; 22: 316-322
78. Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Magno C et al. Contrast-enhanced second - harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 1525-1530
79. Kreft B, Schild HH. Zystische Nierenläsionen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 892-903
80. Veltri A, De Fazio G, Malfitana V et al. Percutaneous US-guided RF thermal ablation for malignant renal tumors: preliminary results in 13 patients. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 2303-2310
81. Delorme S, Krix M, Albrecht T. Ultraschallkontrastmittel - Grundlagen und klinische Anwendung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 155-164