Selection and ranking of ground motion models for seismic hazard analysis in the Pyrenees

Journal of Seismology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 87-100

  Drouet, Stéphane ^a   Scherbaum, Frank ^c   Cotton, Fabrice ^d   Souriau, Annie ^b  

^a CEA DIF   (France)

^b OBSERVATOIRE MIDI PYRÉNÉES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^d OBSERVATOIRE DE GRENOBLE   (France)

Author keywords

Acceleration response spectra; Ground motion models; Pyrenees; Seismic hazard

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GROUND MOTION; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC MOMENT; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; PYRENEES;

EID: 33846978795     PISSN: 13834649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-006-9039-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abrahamson NA, Shedlock KM (1997) Overview. Seismol Res Lett 68:9-23
2. Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:94-127
3. Ambraseys NN, Free MW (1997) Surface-wave magnitude calibration for European region earthquakes. J Earthq Eng 1:1-22
4. Ambraseys N, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Int J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:371-400
5. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1997) Some comparison between recent ground-motion relations. Seismol Res Lett 68:24-40
6. Bay F, Fäh D, Malagnini L, Giardini D (2003) Spectral shear-wave ground-motion scaling in Switzerland. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:414-429
7. Berge-Thierry C, Cotton F, Scotti O, Griot-Pommera DA, Fukushima Y (2003) New empirical response spectral attenuation laws for moderate European earthquakes. J Earthq Eng 7:193-222
8. Bommer J, Scherbaum F, Bungum H, Cotton F, Sabetta F, Abrahamson NA (2005) On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:377-389
9. Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent works. Seismol Res Lett 68:128-153
10. Braunmiller J, Deichmann N, Giardini D, Wiemer S, SED Magnitude Working Group (2005) Homogeneous moment-magnitude calibration in Switzerland. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:58-74
11. Campbell W, Bozorgnia Y (2003) Updated near source ground motion relations for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and pseudo-absolute acceleration response sVectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:314-331, Errata: vol. 93 p. 1413, vol. 94. p 2417
12. Campillo M, Plantet JL (1991) Frequency dependence and spatial distribution of seismic attenuation in France: Experimental results and possible interpretations. Phys Earth Planet Int 67:48-64
13. Campillo M, Plantet JL, Bouchon M (1985) Frequency-dependent attenuation in the crust beneath central France from L g waves: Data analysis and numerical modelling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1395-1411
14. Cotton F, Scherbaum F, Bommer J, Bungum H, Sabetta F (2006) Criteria for selecting and adapting ground-motion models for specific target regions Application to Central Europe and rock sites. J Seismol 10:137-156
15. De Mets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF, Stein S (1990) Current plate motions. Geophys J Int 101:425-478
16. Douglas J (2003) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: A review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectra ordinates. Earth Sci Rev 61:43-104
17. Drouet S, Souriau A, Cotton F (2005) Attenuation, seismic moments, and site effects for weak-motion events: Application to the Pyrenees. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95 BSSA 95(5):1731-1748, doi: 10.1785/0120040105
18. Drouet S, Chevrot S, Cotton F, Souriau A (2006) Joint inversion of seismic moments, attenuation parameters and site effects from the French accelerometric data. EGU Meeting, 2-7 April 2006, Vienna, Austria
19. Dubos N, Sylvander M, Souriau A, Ponsolles C, Chevrot S, Fels JF, Benahmed S (2004) Analysis of the May 2002 earthquake sequence in the central Pyrenees, consequences for the evaluation of the seismic risk at Lourdes, France. Geophys J Int 156:527-540
20. Heaton T, Tajima F, Mori AW (1986) Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms. Surv Geophys 8:25-83
21. Lambert J, Levret-Albaret A (1996) Mille ans de séismes en France. Ouest Editions, Presses Académiques, p 80
22. Lussou P, Fukushima Y, Bard PY, Cotton F (2001) Seismic design regulation codes: Contribution of Knet data to site effect evaluation. J Earthq Eng 5:13-33
23. Marin S, Avouac J-P, Nicolas M, Schlupp A (2004) A probabilistic approach to seismic hazard in metropolitan France. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:2137-2163
24. g coda Q variation across Eurasia and its relation to crustal evolution. J Geophys Res 102:22767-22779
25. Mooney WD, Laske G, Masters TG (1998) CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5°×5°. J Geophys Res 103:727-747
26. Nocquet JM, Calais E (2003) Crustal velocity field of western Europe from permanent GPS array solutions, 1996-2001. Geophys J Int 154:72-88
27. Reiter L (1990) Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights. Columbia University Press, New York, p 254
28. Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of ground motion and simulation of Nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:337-352
29. Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Smit P (2004a) On the use of response spectral reference data for the selection and ranking of ground-motion models for seismic hazard analysis in regions of moderate seismicity: The case of rock motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1-22
30. Scherbaum F, Schmedes J, Cotton F (2004b) On the conversion of source-to-site distance measures for extended earthquake source model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1053-1059
31. Scholz CH, Aviles CA, Wesnousky SG (1986) Scaling differences between large intraplate and interplate earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76:65-70
32. Singh SK, Herrmann RB (1983) Regionalization of crustal coda Q in the continental United States. J Geophys Res 88:527-538
33. Souriau A, Pauchet H (1998) A new synthesis of Pyrenean seismicity and its tectonic implications. Tectonophysics 290:221-244
34. Souriau A, Sylvander M, Rigo A, Fels J-F, Douchain J-M, Ponsolles C (2001) Sismotectonique des Pyrénées: Principales contraintes sismologiques. Bull Soc Géol France 172:25-39
35. Steidl JH, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1996) What is a reference site? Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1733-1748