Radiologic evaluation of cup placement variation in conventional total hip arthroplasty;Radiologische evaluation der variationsbreite der pfannenpositionierung bei konventioneller hüftendoprothesenversorgung

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 46-52

  Leichtle, U ^a   Cosselke, N ^b   Wirth, C J ^c   Rudert, Maximilian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Medizinische Klinik   (Germany)

^c HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anteversion; Computer assisted arthroplasty; Cup positioning; Inclination; Navigation; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACETABULOPLASTY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION PHYSICS; RADIODIAGNOSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ACETABULUM; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDICS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 33846932329     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-927085     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 530-534
2. Collier MB. The role of acetabular component alignment in volumetric wear calculations. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2000; 25: 576
3. D'Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell Jr CW. Optimizing acetabular component position to minimize impingement and reduce contact stress. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 87-91
4. Lipman J, Padgett D. The effect of highwall liner orientation on total hip rangeof motion during activities of daily living. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2001; 26: 1046
5. Mattessich S, Nakamura Y, Elias J et al. Effects of femoral head design, cup orientation, and wear on hip range of motion. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2000; 25: 521
6. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60: 217-220
7. Nadzadi ME, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ et al. Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17: 32-40
8. Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 1202-1210
9. Yuan L, Shih C. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999; 119: 263-266
10. Noble PC. Biomechanics of dislocation after total hip replacement. Curr Opin Orthop 2001; 12: 79-84
11. Turner RS. Postoperative total hip prosthetic femoral head dislocations. Incidence, etiologic factors, and management. Clin Orthop 1994; 301: 196-204
12. Bader R, Willmann G. Keramische Pfannen für Hüftendoprothesen. Teil 7: Wie beeinflussen Lage des Rotationszentrums und CCD-Winkel des Schaftes Range of Motion und Impingement? Biomed Technik 1999; 44: 345-351
13. Yoshimine F, Hoshino H, Mikasa M. A shape of the safe area for the cup position that fulfills the criteria for acceptable range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2001; 26: 1052
14. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M et al. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 8-22
15. Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Blackwell M et al. Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1998; 354: 70-81
16. Harris WH. Advances in Surgical Technique for total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1980; 146: 188-204
17. Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of socalled second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1845-1852
18. Rossig S, Kohn D. Verbesserte radiologische Darstellung von Hüft schraubpfannen. Z Orthop 1996; 134: 36-43
19. Giant TT, Jacobs JJ, Mikecz K et al. Particulate-Induced, Prostaglandinand Cytokine-Mediated Bone Resorption in an Experimental System and in Failed Joint Replacements. Am J Ther 1996; 3: 27-41
20. Harris WH. Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: the problem. Clin Orthop 2001;393:66-70
21. Murray DW, Rushton N. Macrophages stimulate bone resorption when they phagocytose particles. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 988-992
22. Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M. Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56: 1368-1382
23. Mestan H, Cavallaro A, Horger W et al. Bestimmung der Knorpelverteilung im Hüftgelenk in Beziehung zur Femurhalsachse basierend auf 3.0T-MRT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: S 289
24. Hirakawa K, Mitsugi N, Koshino T et al. Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; 388:135-142
25. Bader R, Steinhauser E, Gradinger R et al. Computergestutzte Bewegungssimulation an Hüftendoprothesen mit Keramik-Keramik-Gleitpaarung. Analyse der Einflussparameter Implantat-Design und Position. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002; 140: 310-316
26. Muller O, Lembeck B, Reize P et al. Quantifizierung und Visualisierung des Einflusses der Beckenkippung auf die Messung von Pfanneninklination und -anteversion. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005; 143: 72-78
27. Honl M, Schwieger K, Gauck CH et al. Pfannenposition und Orientierung im Vergleich - Navigation vs. konventionelle Handimplantation von Hüftendoprothesen. Orthopäde 2005; 34: 1131-1136
28. Kovacs P, Rosenberger RR, Dolati BD et al. Navigations unterstützte, minimal invasive Stabilisation von Beckenfrakturen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: S 336
29. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Würstlin S et al. Alignment der Beinachse nach navigierter vs. nicht-navigierter Knieendoprothese. CT-Analyse einer prospektiven, kontrollierten und randomisierten Studie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: S 201