Adaptive inversion database for electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation

NDT and E International

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 192-202

  Pávó, József ^a   Gyimóthy, Szabolcs ^a  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Crack sizing; Database; Eddy current testing; Inverse problems

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; CRACKS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; ELECTROMAGNETISM; INVERSE PROBLEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CRACK SIZING; DEFECT MODEL PARAMETERS; MESHING; SIMPLEX MESH;

EDDY CURRENT TESTING;

EID: 33846914229     PISSN: 09638695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ida N. Numerical modelling for electromagnetic non-destructive evaluation (1995), Chapman & Hall, London
2. Lesselier D, Bowler J, editors. Inverse problems 2002;18:1733-963.
3. Pávó J., and Miya K. Reconstruction of crack shape by optimization using eddy current field measurement. IEEE Trans Magn 30 (1994) 3407-3410
4. Pávó J., and Gyimóthy Sz. Design method for optimal database used for inverse problems in ECT. In: Sollier T., Prémel D., and Lesselier D. (Eds). Electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation (VIII) (2004), IOS Press, Amsterdam 69-76
5. Gyimóthy Sz., and Pávó J. Qualification of the inverse problem of defect reconstruction using optimized mesh database. COMPEL 24 2 (2005) 436-442
6. Gyimóthy S., Pávó J., and Tsuboi H. Conceptual evaluation of inversion models used for layered structures. IEEE Trans Magn 42 4 (2006) 1091-1094
7. MATLAB Mathematics. The MathWorks Inc; 2004. p. 2/18-37.
8. Groff RE, Khargonekar PP, Koditschek DE, Thieret TT, Mestha LK. Modelling and control of color xerographic processes. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE conference on decision and control, 1999. p. 2/1697-1702.
9. Sambridge M. Finding acceptable models in nonlinear inverse problems using a neighbourhood algorithm. Inverse Problems 17 (2001) 387-403
10. Takagi T., and Fukutomi H. Benchmark activity of eddy current testing for steam generator tubes. In: Udpa S.S., et al. (Ed). Electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation (IV) (2000), IOS Press, Amsterdam 235-252
11. Lesselier D., and Razek A. Eddy current scattering and inverse scattering: Green's integral and variational formulations. In: Pike R., and Sabatier P.C. (Eds). Scattering: scattering and inverse scattering in pure and applied science. Part I. Scattering of waves by macroscopic targets (2002), Academic Press, London 486-507
12. Badics Z., Matsumoto Y., Aoki K., Nakayasu F., Uesaka M., and Miya K. An effective 3-D finite element scheme for computing electromagnetic field distortions due to defects in eddy-current nondestructive evaluation. IEEE Trans Magn 33 (1997) 1012-1020
13. Takagi T., Huang H., Fukutomi H., and Tani J. Numerical evaluation of correlation between crack size and eddy current testing signal by a very fast simulator. IEEE Trans Magn 34 (1998) 2581-2584
14. Bertrand V., Lesselier D., and Mastorchio S. On the numerical modelling of eddy current nondestructive evaluation with FEM-BEM TRIFOU software in controlled configurations. In: Udpa S.S., et al. (Ed). Electromagnetic non-destructive evaluation (IV) (2000), IOS Press, Amsterdam 32-41
15. Albanese R., Rubinacci G., Tamburrino A., and Villone F. Phenomenological approaches based on an integral formulation for forward and inverse problems in eddy current testing. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech 12 (2002) 115-137
16. Bowler J.R. Eddy current interaction with ideal crack, part I: the forward problem. J Appl Phys 75 12 (1994) 8128-8137
17. Dodd C.V., and Deeds W.E. Analytical solutions to eddy current probe coil problems. J Appl Phys 39 (1968) 2829-2838
18. Rivara M.C. Mesh refinement processes based on the generalised bisection of simplices. SIAM J Num Anal 21 (1984) 604-613
19. Shewchuk JR. What is a good linear element? Interpolation, conditioning, and quality measures. Proceedings of the 11th international meshing roundtable, Sandia National Laboratories; 2002. p. 115-26.