Contextual effects on smooth-pursuit eye movements

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 1353-1367

  Spering, Miriam ^a   Gegenfurtner, Karl R ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOOTH PURSUIT EYE MOVEMENT; VELOCITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PURSUIT, SMOOTH;

EID: 33846902779     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01087.2006     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Albright TD, Stoner GR. Contextual influences on visual processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 25: 339-379, 2002.
2. Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local- global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci 8: 407-430, 1985.
3. Anstis S, Casco C. Induced movement: the flying bluebottle illusion. J Vis 6: 1087-1092, 2006.
4. Barthélemy F, Vanzetta I, Masson GS. A behavioral receptive field for ocular following in humans: dynamics of spatial summation and center-surround interactions. J Neurophysiol 95: 3712-3726, 2006.
5. Born RT, Groh JT, Zhao R, Lukasewysc SJ. Segregation of object and background motion in visual area MT: effects of microstimulation on eye movements. Neuron 26: 725-734, 2000.
6. Churchland AK, Lisberger SG. Relationship between extraretinal component of firing rate and eye speed in area MST of macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol 94: 2416-2426, 2005.
7. Collewijn H, Tamminga EP. Human smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. J Physiol 351: 217-250, 1984.
8. Crane HD, Steele CM. Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker. Appl Optics 24: 527-537, 1985.
9. Deubel H, Bridgeman B. Fourth Purkinje image signals reveal eye-lens deviation and retinal image distortions during saccades. Vis Res 35: 529-538, 1995.
10. Duncker K. Ueber induzierte Bewegung: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie optisch wahrgenommener Bewegung [On induced motion: a contribution to the theory of optically perceived motion]. Psychol Forsch 12: 180-259, 1929.
11. Ferrera VP, Lisberger SG. Attention and target selection for smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurosci 15: 7472-7484, 1995.
12. Holland BS, Copenhaver MD. Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychol Bull 104: 145-149, 1988.
13. Ilg UJ, Thier P. Inability of rhesus monkey area V1 to discriminate between self-induced and externally induced retinal image slip. Eur J Neurosci 8: 1156-1166, 1996.
14. Kawano K, Miles FA. Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. II. Dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. J Neurophysiol 56: 1355-1380, 1986.
15. Keller EL, Khan NS. Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey. Vis Res 26: 943-955, 1986.
16. Kimmig HG, Miles FA, Schwarz U. Effects of stationary textured backgrounds on the initiation of pursuit eye movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 68: 2147-2164, 1992.
17. Kodaka Y, Miura K, Suehiro K, Takemura A, Kawano K. Ocular tracking of moving targets: effects of perturbing the background. J Neurophysiol 91: 2474-2483, 2004.
18. Kowler E, McKee SP. Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity. Vis Res 27: 993-1015, 1987.
19. Kowler E, Murphy BJ, Steinman RM. Velocity matching during smooth pursuit of different targets on different backgrounds. Vis Res 18: 603-605, 1978.
20. Krauzlis RJ, Miles FA. Transitions between pursuit eye movements and fixation in the monkey: dependence on context. J Neurophysiol 76: 1622-1638, 1996.
21. Lindner A, Ilg UJ. Suppression of optokinesis during smooth pursuit eye movements revisited: the role of extraretinal information. Vis Res 46: 761-767, 2006.
22. Lindner A, Schwarz U, Ilg UJ. Cancellation of self-induced retinal image motion during smooth pursuit eye movements. Vis Res 41: 1685-1694, 2001.
23. Lisberger SG, Morris EJ, Tychsen L. Visual motion processing and sensory-motor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 10: 97-129, 1987.
24. Masson G, Proteau L, Mestre DR. Effects of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual tracking in humans. Vis Res 35: 837-852, 1995.
25. McCourt ME. A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect. Vis Res 22: 119-134, 1982.
26. Mohrmann H, Thier P. The influence of structured visual backgrounds on smooth-pursuit initiation, steady-state pursuit, and smooth pursuit termination. Biol Cybern 73: 83-93, 1995.
27. Niemann T, Hoffmann KP. The influence of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on smooth-pursuit initiation and steady state pursuit in humans. Exp Brain Res 115: 531-540, 1997.
28. Pack CC, Hunter JN, Born RT. Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. J Neurophysiol 93: 1809-1815, 2005.
29. Rashbass C. The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements. J Physiol 159: 326-338, 1961.
30. Robinson DA, Gordon JL, Gordon SE. A model of the smooth pursuit eye movement system. Biol Cybern 55: 43-57, 1986.
31. Rock I, Palmer S. The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Sci Am 263: 48-61, 1990.
32. Roelfsema PR. Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annu Rev Neurosci 29: 203-227, 2006.
33. Sceniak MP, Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, Shapley R. Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons. Nat Neurosci 2: 733-739, 1999.
34. Schwarz U, Ilg UJ. Asymmetry in visual motion processing. Neuroreport 10: 2477-2480, 1999.
35. Soechting JF, Engel KC, Flanders M. The Duncker illusion and eye-hand coordination. J Neurophysiol 85: 843-854, 2001.
36. Spering M, Gegenfurtner KR, Kerzel D. Distractor interference during smooth pursuit eye movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32: 1136-1154, 2006.
37. Spering M, Kerzel D, Braun DI, Hawken MJ, Gegenfurtner KR. Effects of contrast on smooth pursuit eye movements. J Vis 5: 455-465, 2005.
38. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Kirchner WH, Zhang SW. Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees. Vis Neurosci 6: 519-535, 1991.
39. Srinivasan MV, Zhang S. Visual motor computations in insects. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 679-696, 2004.
40. Suehiro K, Miura K, Kodaka Y, Inoue Y, Takemura A, Kawano K. Effects of smooth pursuit eye movement on ocular responses to sudden background motion in humans. Neurosci Res 35: 329-338, 1999.
41. Tadin D, Lappin JS, Gilroy LA, Blake R. Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature 424: 312-315, 2003.
42. Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Saito H, Yukie M, Fukada Y, Iwai E. Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 6: 134-144, 1986.
43. Tynan P, Sekuler R. Moving visual phantoms: a new contour completion effect. Science 188: 951-952, 1975.
44. Van Die GC, Collewijn H. Control of human optokinetic nystagmus by the central and peripheral retina: effects of partial visual field masking, scotopic vision and central retinal scotoma. Brain Res 383: 185-194, 1986.
45. Waespe W, Schwarz U. Slow eye movements induced by apparent target motion in monkey. Exp Brain Res 67: 433-435, 1987.
46. Warren WH, Kay BA, Zosh WD, Duchon AP, Sahuc S. Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nat Neurosci 4: 213-216, 2001.
47. Worfolk R, Barnes GR. Interaction of active and passive slow eye movement systems. Exp Brain Res 90: 589-598, 1992.
48. Wyatt HJ, Pola J. A mechanism for suppression of optokinesis. Vis Res 24: 1931-1945, 1984.
49. Zivotofsky AZ. A dissociation between perception and action in open-loop smooth-pursuit ocular tracking of the Duncker illusion. Neurosci Lett 376: 81-86, 2005.
50. Zivotofsky AZ, Averbuch-Heller L, Thomas CW, Das VE, Discenna AO, Leigh RJ. Tracking of illusory target motion: differences between gaze and head responses. Vis Res 35: 3029-3035, 1995.
51. Zivotofsky AZ, White OB, Das VE, Leigh RJ. Saccades to remembered targets: the effects of saccades and illusory stimulus motion. Vis Res 38: 1287-1294, 1998.