Behavioral receptive field for ocular following in humans: Dynamics of spatial summation and center-surround interactions

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 3712-3726

  Barthélemy, Frédéric V ^a   Vanzetta, Ivo ^a   Masson, Guillaume S ^a,b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UMR6193 CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NERVE CELL; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL SUMMATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33744909582     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00112.2006     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abadi RV, Howard IP, Ohmi M, and Lee EE. The effect of central and peripheral field stimulation on the rise time and gain of human optokinetic nystagmus. Perception 34: 1015-1024, 2005.
2. Albrecht DG, Geisler WS, and Crane AM. Nonlinear properties of visual cortex neurons: temporal dynamics, stimulus selectivity, neural performance. In: The Visual Neuroscience, edited by Chapula LM and Werner JS. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003, p. 747-764.
3. Albrecht DG and Hamilton DH. Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. J Neurophysiol 48: 217-237, 1982.
4. Albright TD and Desimone R. Local precision of visuotopic organization in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque. Exp Brain Res 65: 582-592, 1987.
5. Allman J, Miezin F, and McGuiness E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci 8: 407-430, 1985.
6. Anderson SJ and Burr DC. Spatial summation properties of directionally sensitive mechanisms in human vision. J Opt Soc Am A 8: 1330-1339, 1991.
7. Bair W, Cavanaugh JR, and Movshon JA. Time course and time- distance relationships for surround suppression in macaque V1 neurons. Neuroscience 23: 7690-7701, 2003.
8. Barlow HB. Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J Physiol 111: 69-88, 1953.
9. Bonin V, Mante V, and Carandini M. The suppressive field of neurons in lateral geniculate nucleus. Neuroscience 25: 10844-10856, 2005.
10. Born RT. Center-surround interactions in the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey. J Neurophysiol 84: 2658-2669, 2000.
11. Born RT, Groh JM, Zhao R, and Lukasewycz SL. Segregation of object and background motion in visual area MT: effects of micro-stimulation on eye movements. Neuron 26: 725-734, 2000.
12. Born RT and Tootell RBH. Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature 357: 497-499, 1991.
13. Busettini C, Masson GS, and Miles FA. A role for stereoscopic depth cues in the rapid visual stabilization of the eyes. Nature 380: 1627-1641, 1996.
14. Carandini M. Receptive fields and suppressive fields in the early visual system. In: The Cognitive Neurosciences III, edited by Gazzaniga MS. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004, p. 313-326.
15. Carandini M, Heeger DJ, and Movshon JA. Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. Neuroscience 17: 8621-8644, 1996.
16. Cavanaugh JR, Bair W, and Movshon JA. Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurophysiol 88: 2530-2546, 2002.
17. Chubb C, Sperling G, and Solomon JA. Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 9631-9635, 1989.
18. Collewijn H, van der Mark F, and Jansen TC. Precise recordings of human eye movements. Vision Res 15: 447-450, 1985.
19. DeAngelis GC and Uka T. Coding of horizontal disparity and velocity by MT neurons in the alert macaque. J Neurophysiol 89: 1094-1111, 2003.
20. Eifuku S and Wurtz RH. Response to motion in extra-striate area MSTl: Center-surround interactions. J Neurophysiol 80: 282-296, 1998.
21. Field DJ, Hayes A, and Hess RF. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local "association field." Vision Res 16: 1131-1139, 1993.
22. Gellman RA, Carl JR, and Miles FA. Short-latency ocular-following responses in man. Vis Neurosci 5: 107-122, 1990.
23. Hartline HK. The response of single optic nerve fibers of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina. Am J Physiol 121: 400-415, 1938.
24. Hays AV, Richmond BJ, and Optican LA. A UNIX-based multiple process system for real-time data acquisition and control. WESCON Conf Proc 2: 1-10, 1982.
25. Heeger DJ. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 9: 181-198, 1992.
26. Heeger DJ. Modeling simple cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators. J Neurophysiol 70: 1885-1898, 1993.
27. Heinen SJ and Watamaniuk SNJ. Spatial integration in human smooth pursuit. Vision Res 38: 3785-3794, 1998.
28. Heuer HW and Britten KH. Contrast dependence of response normalization in area MT of the rhesus macaque. J Neurophysiol 88: 3398-3408, 2002.
29. Howard IP and Ohmi M. The efficiency of the central and peripheral retina in driving human optokinetic nystagmus. Vision Res 24: 969-976, 1984.
30. Kapadia MK, Westheimer G, and Gilbert CD. Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 12073-12078, 1999.
31. Kawano K. Ocular tracking: behavior and neurophysiology. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 467-473, 1999.
32. Kawano K, Shidara M, Watanabe Y, and Yamane S. Neural activity in cortical area MST of alert monkey during ocular following responses. J Neurophysiol 71: 680-703, 1994.
33. Keller EL and Kahn NS. Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey. Vision Res 26: 943-955, 1986.
34. Kimmig HG, Miles FA, and Schwartz U. Effects of stationary textured backgrounds on the initiation of pursuit eye movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 68: 2147-2164, 1992.
35. Knierim JJ and Van Essen DC. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 41: 1071-1095, 1992.
36. Krauzlis RJ and Miles FA. Release of fixation for pursuit and saccades in humans: evidence for shared inputs acting on different neural substrates. J Neurophysiol 78: 2822-2833, 1996.
37. Kuffler SW. Discharge patterns and functional organization of the mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol 53: 37-68, 1953.
38. Lamme VF. The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Neuroscience 15: 1605-1615, 1995.
39. Landy MS, Cohen Y, and Sperling G. HIPS: image processing under UNIX. Software and applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 16: 199-216, 1984.
40. Mante V, Frazor RA, Bonin V, Geisler WS, and Carandini M. Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system. Nat Neurosci 8: 1690-1697, 2005.
41. Masson GS. From 1D to 2D via 3D: surface motion integration for gaze stabilization in primates. J Physiol (Paris) 98: 35-52, 2004.
42. Masson GS, Busettini C, Yang D-S, and Miles FA. Short-latency ocular following in humans: sensitivity to binocular disparity. Vision Res 41: 3371-3387, 2001.
43. Masson GS and Castet E. Parallel motion processing for the initiation of short-latency ocular following in humans. Neuroscience 22: 5149-5163, 2002.
44. Masson GS, Rybarzyck Y, Castet E, and Mestre DR. Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies. Vis Neurosci 17: 753-767, 2000.
45. Masson GS, Yang D-S, and Miles FA. Reversed short-latency ocular following in humans. Vision Res 42: 2081-2087, 2002.
46. Miles FA. The neuronal processing of 3-D visual information: evidence from eye movements. Eur J Neurosci 10: 811-822, 1998.
47. Miles FA and Kawano K. Visual stabilization of the eyes. Trends Neurosci 10: 153-158, 1987.
48. Miles FA, Kawano K, and Optican LM. Short-latency ocular following responses of monkeys. I. Dependence on temporo-spatial properties of the visual input. J Neurophysiol 56: 1321-1354, 1986.
49. Nakayama K and Loomis JM. Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis. Perception 3: 63-80, 1974.
50. Pack CC, Berezovski VK, and Born RT. Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert and anesthetized macaque monkeys. Nature 414: 905-908, 2001.
51. Pack CC, Hunter NJ, and Born RT. Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical are MT of alert macaque. J Neurophysiol 93: 1809-1815, 2005.
52. Perge JA, Borghuis BG, Bours RJE, Lankheet JM, and Van Wezel RJA. Dynamics of directional selectivity in MT receptive field center and surround. Eur J Neurosci 22: 2049-2058, 2005.
53. Petrov Y, Carandini M, and McKee S. Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision. Neuroscience 25: 8704-8707, 2005.
54. Priebe NJ and Lisberger SG. Estimating target speed from the population response in visual area MT. Neuroscience 24: 1907-1916, 2004.
55. Qian N and Andersen RA. V1 responses to transparent and nontransparent motions. Exp Brain Res 103: 41-50, 1995.
56. Robinson DA. A method of measuring eye movements using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 10: 137-145, 1963.
57. Rust NC, Simoncelli EP, and Movshon JA. Neurons in MT compute pattern direction by pooling excitatory and suppressive inputs. J Vis 5: 83a, 2005
58. Sceniak MP, Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, and Shapley R. Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons. Nat Neurosci 2: 733-739, 1999.
59. Schwartz O and Simoncelli EP. Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nat Neurosci 4: 819-825, 2001.
60. Sheliga BM, Chen KJ, FitzGibbon EJ, and Miles FA. Initial ocular following: a response to first-order motion energy. Vision Res 45: 3307-3321, 2005.
61. Simoncelli EP and Heeger DJ. A model of neuronal response in visual area MT. Vision Res 38: 743-761, 1998.
62. Smith MA, Majaj NJ, and Movshon JA. Dynamics of motion signaling by neurons in macaque area MT. Nat Neurosci 8: 220-228, 2005.
63. Solomon JA, Sperling G, and Chubb C. The lateral inhibition of perceived contrast is indifferent to on-center/off-center segregation, but specific to orientation. Vision Res 33: 2671-2683, 1993.
64. Tadin D, Lappin JS, Gilroy LA, and Blake R. Perceptual consequences of center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature 424: 312-315, 2003.
65. Takemura A, Inoue Y, and Kawano K. Visually driven eye movements elicited at ultra-short latency are severely impaired by MST neurons. Ann NY Acad Sci 956: 456-459, 2002.
66. Takemura A, Inoue Y, Kawano K, Quaia C, and Miles FA. Single-unit activity in cortical area MST associated with disparity-vergence eye movements: evidence for population coding. J Neurophysiol 85: 2245-2266, 2001.
67. Verghese P and Stone LS. Perceived visual speed constrained by image segmentation. Nature 381: 161-163, 1996.
68. Watson AB and Turano K. The optimal motion stimulus. Vision Res 35: 325-336, 1995.
69. Xing J and Heeger DJ. Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement. Vision Res 41: 571-583, 2001.