Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 113-120

  Ghavamnasiri, Majaneh ^a,b,c,d   Moosavi, Horieh ^a,d   Tahvildarnejad, Najmeh ^e  

^a MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^d Iranian Academy of Cosmetic Restorative Denstry   (Iran)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Centripetal; Class II restoration; Incremental; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846902111     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-2-113     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in Class II Composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 713-719.
2. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997; 25:435-440.
3. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59:297-300.
4. Barkmeier WW, Cooley RL. Current status of adhesive resin systems. J Am Coll Dent 1991;58:36-39.
5. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: A summarizing review. JADA 1972;84:1349-1357.
6. Neiva IF, de Andrada MAC, Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Ritter AV. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent 1998;23:282-9.
7. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light -reflecting wedges. Quint Int 1986;17:659-64.
8. Losche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:31-9.
9. Mullejans R, Badawi MOF, Raab WHM, Lang H. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:122-126.
10. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quint Int 1986;17:777-784.
11. Bichacho N. The centripetal build-up for composite resin restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994; 6:17-23.
12. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangac B. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V Cavities. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 42-46.
13. Peris AR, Duarte S, Andrade MF. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins. Quint Int 2003; 34: 93-98.
14. Gale MS, Dravell BW, Cheung GSP. Three-dimensionl reconstruction of microleakage pattern using a sequential grinding technique. J Dent 1994; 22: 370-375.
15. Paskin A, Tassery H, Hoore W, Gonthier S, Vreven J, Degrange M, Dejou J. Influence of the number of sections on reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 207 - 210.
16. Dietschi D, Krejci I. Adhesive restoratives in posterior teeth: rationale for the application of direct techniques. Oper Dent 2001; 6:191-197.
17. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Dose an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996; 75: 871-878.
18. Szep S, Frank H, Kenzel B, Gerhardt T, Heidemann D. Comparative study of composite resin placement: Centripetal buildup versus incremental technique. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001;13:243-250.
19. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, PaPathanasiou A, Perry R. Microleakage of resin - based Liner materials and condensable composites using filled and unfilled adhesives. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 351-355.
20. Scherer W, Caliskan F, Kaim JM, Cooper H, Zimmerman M. Microleakage comparison in opaque and transparent matrix systems. Gen Dentistry 1989;37: 482-484.