Influence of the number of sections on reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 207-210

  Raskin, Anne ^a   Tassery, Herve ^a   D'Hoore, William ^b   Gonthier, Samuel ^c   Vreven, José ^b   Degrange, Michel ^a   Déjou, Jaques ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c Université Catholique de Louvain ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FUCHSINE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILICON DIOXIDE; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MICROTOMY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SILVER STAINING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MICROTOMY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS; ROSANILINE DYES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILVER STAINING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 4644251764     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976; 4:199-206.
2. Brännström M. The cause of postoperative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986;12:475-481.
3. Prati C. What is the clinical relevance of in vitro dentine permeability tests ? J Dent 1994;22: 83-88.
4. Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: Clinical significance. J Dent 1994;22: S9-S12.
5. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20: 3-10.
6. Stanley HR. Guest editorial: An urgent plea for a standardized bonding (adhesion) test. J Dent Res 1993;72: 1362-1363.
7. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1997;22: 173-185.
8. Mixson J, Eick JD, Chappell RP, et al. Comparison of two surface and multiple-surface scoring methodologies for in vitro microleakage studies. Dent Mater 1991;7: 191-196.
9. Gwinnett JA, Tay FR, Pang KM, et al. Comparison of three methods of critical evaluation of microleakage along restorative interfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74: 575-585.
10. Tay FR, Pang KM, Gwinnett AJ, et al. A method for microleakage evaluation along the dentin/restorative interface. Am J Dent 1995;8: 105-108.
11. Gale MS, Darvell BW, Cheung GSP. Three-dimensional reconstruction of microleakage pattern using a sequential grinding technique. J Dent 1994;22: 370-375.
12. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997;28: 135-144.
13. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Am J Dent 1998;11: 123-130.
14. Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, et al. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: Literature review. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:295-308.
15. Rueggeberg FA. Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure - Review of the literature. Dent Mater 1991;7: 2-10.
16. Söderholm KJM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: A report of the ASC MD 156 Task Group on Test Methods for the Adhesion of Restorative materials. Dent Mater 1991;7: 74-84.
17. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J. The battle of the bonds 1995. Rev Mens Suisse Odontostomatol 1997;107: 32-36.
18. Finger WJ, Balkenhol M. Practitioner variability effects on dentin bonding with an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive. J Adhes Dent 1999;1: 311-314.
19. Sano H, Kanemura N, Burrow MF, et al. Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: Students vs. dentists. Dent Mater 1998;17: 51-58.
20. Jörgensen KD, Itoh K, Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E. Composite wall-to-wall polymerization contraction in dentin cavities treated with various bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res 1985;93: 276-279.
21. Finger WJ. Dentin bonding agents. Revelance of in vitro evaluations. Am J Dent 1988;1- Special Issue: 184-188.
22. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27: 89-99.
23. Déjou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater 1996;12: 342-349.
24. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed, Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Editions, 1988; 180, 206-216,235-245.
25. Chohayeb AA. Bonding to tooth structure: Clinical and biological considerations. Int Dent J 1988;38: 105-111.
26. Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 1990;16: 70-77.