Social transfer of predation risk information reduces food locating ability in European minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus)

Ethology

Volumn 113, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 166-173

  Johnsson, Jörgen I ^a   Sundström, L Fredrik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYPRINID; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALIA; CYPRINIDAE; PHOXINUS PHOXINUS; SALMO TRUTTA;

EID: 33846895766     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01296.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abrahams, M. V. & Healey, M. C. 1993: A comparison of the willingness of 4 species of Pacific salmon to risk exposure to a predator. Oikos 66, 439-446.
2. Anholt, B. R., Werner, E. & Skelly, D. K. 2000: Effect of food and predators on the activity of four larval ranid frogs. Ecology 81, 3509-3521.
3. van Bergen, Y., Coolen, I. & Laland, K. N. 2004: Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 957-962.
4. Brown, C. & Braithwaite, V. A. 2005: Effects of predation pressure on the cognitive ability of the poeciliid Brachyaphis episcope. Behav. Ecol. 16, 482-487.
5. Brown, C. & Laland, K. N. 2003: Social learning in fishes: a review. Fish Fisher. 4, 280-288.
6. Chivers, D. P. & Smith, R. J. F. 1994: Fathead minnows Pimephales promelas acquire predator recognition when alarm substance is associated with the sight of unfamiliar fish. Anim. Behav. 48, 597-605.
7. Coolen, I., Dangles, O. & Casas, J. 2005a: Social learning in noncolonial insects? Current Biol. 15, 1931-1935.
8. Coolen, I., Ward, A. J. W., Hart, P. J. B. & Laland, K. N. 2005b: Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues. Behav. Ecol. 16, 865-870.
9. Danchin, E. & Richner, H. 2001: Viable and unviable hypotheses for the evolution of raven roosts. Anim. Behav. 61, F7-F11.
10. Dugatkin, L. A. & Wilson, D. S. 1992: The prerequisites for strategic behavior in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus. Anim. Behav. 44, 223-230.
11. Dukas, R. 2002: Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1539-1547.
12. Dukas, R. & Kamil, A. C. 2000: The cost of limited attention in blue jays. Behav. Ecol. 11, 502-506.
13. Engqvist, L. 2005: The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim. Behav. 70, 967-971.
14. Galef, B. G. & Giraldeau, L.-A. 2001: Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Anim. Behav. 61, 3-15.
15. Giraldeau, L.-A., Valone, T. J. & Templeton, J. J. 2002: Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1559-1566.
16. Greene, E. 1987: Individuals in an osprey colony discriminate between high and low quality information. Nature 329, 239-241.
17. Griffin, A. S. 2004: Social learning about predators: a review and prospectus. Learning Behav. 32, 131-140.
18. Griffiths, S.W., Brockmark, S., Höjesjö, J. & Johnsson, J. I. 2004: Coping with divided attention: the advantage of familiarity. Proc R Soc Lond B 271, 695-699.
19. Johnsson, J. I., Rydeborg, A. & Sundström, L. F. 2004: Predation risk and the territory value of cover: an experimental study. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56, 388-392.
20. Kelly, W. H. 1967: Marking freshwater and marine fish by injected dyes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 96, 163-175.
21. Kenward, R.E 1978: Hawks and doves: factors affecting success and selection in goshawk attacks on wood pigeons. J. Anim. Ecol. 47, 449-460.
22. Krause, J. & Ruxton, G. D. 2002: Living in Groups. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
23. Laland, K. N. & Reader, S. M. 1999a: Foraging innovation in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 57, 331-340.
24. Laland, K. N. & Reader, S. M. 1999b: Foraging innovation is inversely related to competitive ability in male but not in female guppies. Behav. Ecol. 10, 270-274.
25. Laland, K. N. & Williams, K. 1998: Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy. Behav. Ecol. 9, 493-499.
26. Laland, K. N., Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. 1996: Developing a theory of animal social learning. In: Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture (Heyes, C. M. & Galef B. G. Jr eds). Academic Press, New York. pp. 129-154.
27. Lima, S. L. & Bednekoff, P. A. 1999: Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am. Nat. 153, 649-659.
28. Lima, S. L. & Dill, L. M. 1990: Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation - a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619-640.
29. Lõhmus, M. & Sundström, L. F. 2004: Leptin and social environment influence the risk-taking and feeding behaviour of Asian blue quail. Anim. Behav. 68, 607-612.
30. Pitcher, T. J., Lang, S. H. & Turner, J. R. 1988: A risk-balancing trade-off between foraging rewards and predation hazard in a shoaling fish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22, 225-228.
31. Pollock, M. S., Pollock, R. J. & Chivers, D. P. 2006: Social context influences the antipredator behaviour of fat-head minnows to chemical alarm cues. Ethol 112, 801-806.
32. Power, M. E., Stout, R. J., Cushing, C. E., Harper, P. P., Hauer, F. R. & Matthews, W. J. 1988: Biotic and abiotic controls in river and stream communities. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7, 457-479.
33. Reader, S. M., Kendal, J. R. & Laland, K. N. 2003: Social learning of foraging sites and escape routes in wild Trinidadian guppies. Anim. Behav. 66, 729-739.
34. Sasvári, L & Hegyi, Z. 1998: How mixed-species foraging flocks develop in response to benefits from observational learning. Anim. Behav. 55, 1461-1469.
35. Sundström, L. F., Lõhmus, M., Devlin, R. H., Johnsson, J. I., Biagi, C. A. & Bohlin, T. 2004: Feeding on profitable and unprofitable prey: comparing behaviour of growth-enhanced transgenic and normal coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Ethology 110, 381-396.
36. Voltaire, F.-M. A. 1759: Candide. Various Publishers, Penguin Books, London, UK.
37. Wisenden, B. D. & Barbour, K. 2005: Antipredator responses to skin extract of redbelly dace Phoxinus eos by free-ranging populations of redbelly dace and fat-head minnows Pimephales promelas. Environ. Biol. Fish. 72, 227-233.