Supported lipid bilayer self-spreading on a nanostructured silicon surface

Langmuir

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 367-371

  Furukawa, Kazuaki ^a   Sumitomo, Koji ^a   Nakashima, Hiroshi ^a   Kashimura, Yoshiaki ^a   Torimitsu, Keiichi ^a  

^a Kashino Diverse Brain Research Laboratory of NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; LIPIDS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; SILICON;

ADHESION ENERGIES; NANOSTRUCTURED SURFACES; SUPPORTED LIPID BILAYER (SLB);

SURFACE STRUCTURE;

NANOMATERIAL; PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; PHOSPHATIDYLSERINE; PHOSPHOLIPID; SILICON;

ADHESION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; EGG YOLK; LIPID BILAYER; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

ADHESIONS; ANIMALS; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; EGG YOLK; LIPID BILAYERS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINES; PHOSPHATIDYLSERINES; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; SILICON; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33846879180     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la062911d     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sackmann, E. science 1996, 271, 43-48.
2. Kasemo, B. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 656-677.
3. Mou, J.; Yang, J.; Shao, Z. Biochemistry 1994, 13, 4439-4443.
4. Giocondi, M.-C.; Le Grimellec, C. Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 2218-2230.
5. Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 149-157.
6. Richter, R. P.; Bérat, R.; Brisson, A. R. Langmuir 2006, 22, 3497-3505.
7. Cornell, B. A.; Braach-Maksvytis, V. L. B.; King, L. G.; Osman, P. D. J.; Raguse, B.; Wieczorek, L.; Pace, R. J. Nature 1997, 387, 580-583.
8. Fertig, N.; Tilke, A.; Blick, R. H.; Kotthaus, J. P.; Behrends, J. C.; ten Bruggencate, G. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 1218-1220.
9. Fertig, N.; Meyer, Ch.; Blick, R. H.; Trautmann, Ch.; Behrends, J. C. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 64, 040901.
10. Cheng, Y. L.; Bushby, R. J.; Evans, S. D.; Knowles, P. F.; Miles, R. E.; Ogier, S. D. Langmuir 2001, 17, 1240-1242.
11. (11)Granéli, A.; Rydström, J.; Kasemo, B.; Höök, F. Langmuir 2003, 19, 842-850.
12. Suzuki, H.; Tabata, K.; Kato-Yamada, Y.; Noji, H.; Takeuchi, S. Lab Chip 2004, 4, 502-505.
13. Salafsky, J.; Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 14773-14781.
14. Ide, T.; Takeuchi, Y.; Aoki, T.; Yanagida, T. Jpn. J. Physiol. 2002, 52, 429-434.
15. Glasmästar, K.; Larsson, C.; Höök, F.; Kasemo, B. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 246, 40-47.
16. Wiegand, G.; Arribas-Layton, N.; Hillebrandt, H.; Sackmann, E.; Wagner, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 4245-4254.
17. Rahman, M. M.; Nonogaki, Y.; Tero, R.; Kim, Y.-H.; Uno, H.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Yano, T.; Aoyama, M.; Sasaki, R.; Nagai, H.; Yoshida, M.; Urisu, T. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, L1207-L1210.
18. Groves, J. T.; Ulman, N.; Cremer, P. S.; Boxer, S. G. Langmuir 1998, 14, 3347-3350.
19. Rädler, J.; Strey, H.; Sackmann, E. Langmuir 1995, 11, 4539-4548.
20. Furukawa, K.; Nakashima, H.; Kashimura, Y.; Torimitsu, K. Lab Chip 2006, 6, 1001-1006.
21. Nissen, J.; Jacobs, K.; Rädler, J. O. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 1904-1907.
22. Nabika, H.; Sasaki, A.; Takimoto, B.; Sawai, Y.; He, S.; Murakoshi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16786-16787.
23. Cremer, P. S.; Boxer, S. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 2554-2559.
24. Weng, K. C.; Stålgren, J. J. R.; Duval, D. J.; Risbud, S. H.; Frank, C. W. Langmuir 2004, 20, 7232-7239.
25. The average ratios and standard deviations are 1.82±0.15 (1.6-2.0, six samples) for S1 and 1.45±0.13 (1.3-1.6, four samples) for S2. All samples give 1.0 for S3 (four samples).
26. Movies depicting the self-spreading behavior at the initial stage are supplied as supporting information.
27. The velocities are average values for 40 min. They are calculated from the alternate time-lapse observations (each of them is for 20 min) in two rectangular directions.
28. The difference in average velocities on S1 and S2 is due to the time when those velocities were observed. This is because the front-edge velocity is not constant over a long period. The velocity decreases as the time develops and the distance between the edge and the lipid source increases. This is also true for the velocity in the parallel direction.
29. Israelachvili, J. N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, 1992; Chapter 17.
30. Nissen, J.; Gritsch, S.; Wiegand, G.; Rädler, J. O. Eur. Phys. J. B 1999, 10, 335-344.