메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 55, Issue 219, 2005, Pages 172-198

The ordinary language basis for contextualism, and the new invariantism

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 33846838169     PISSN: 00318094     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00394.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (101)

References (9)
  • 1
    • 3843064285 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Causation as Influence
    • at p. 196
    • D. Lewis, 'Causation as Influence', Journal of Philosophy, 97 (2000), pp. 182-97, at p. 196. I advocated the asymmetry urged in this section in correspondence with Lewis in the early 1990s, where I wielded it against his account of the relation between 'might' and 'would' counterfactual conditionals
    • (2000) Journal of Philosophy , vol.97 , pp. 182-197
    • Lewis, D.1
  • 2
    • 84876858103 scopus 로고
    • Lewis on Might and Would Counterfactual Conditionals
    • pp. 417-18
    • This later came out in my 'Lewis on "Might" and "Would" Counterfactual Conditionals', Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24 (1994), pp. 413-18, at pp. 417-18. Lewis might have already accepted that asymmetry at the time. He raised no methodological objection to me in his correspondence
    • (1994) Canadian Journal of Philosophy , vol.24 , pp. 413-418
  • 3
    • 0041103338 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions
    • p. 913
    • See my 'Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52 (2002), pp. 913-29, at p. 913
    • (2002) Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , vol.52 , pp. 913-929
  • 4
    • 26944502593 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism
    • pp. 120-1
    • Thus where Jason Stanley alters my bank cases in presenting them, collapsing two separate cases, one of which never involves high stakes, and the other of which does involve high stakes that are clear to the speakers when the denial of 'knowledge' is made, into one temporally extended case in which the speaker first claims to 'know', but then, after being reminded of the high stakes that she has faced all along, concedes that she does not 'know' ('On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism', Philosophical Studies, 119 (2004), pp. 119-46, at pp. 120-1), the change hurts the effectiveness of the cases, for the early positive claim of knowledge in Stanley's temporally extended case is of just the problematic type we have been discussing
    • (2004) Philosophical Studies , vol.119 , pp. 119-146
  • 5
    • 61949313533 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons
    • p. 58
    • S. Cohen, 'Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons', Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), pp. 57-89, at p. 58
    • (1999) Philosophical Perspectives , vol.13 , pp. 57-89
    • Cohen, S.1
  • 7
    • 61949299876 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Contextualism and Skepticism
    • pp. 103ff
    • cf. R. Feldman, 'Contextualism and Skepticism', Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), pp. 93-115, at pp. 103ff
    • (1999) Philosophical Perspectives , vol.13 , pp. 93-115
    • Feldman, R.1
  • 8
    • 55449121494 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Context, Interest-Relativity, and Knowledge
    • 11 January
    • J. Stanley, 'Context, Interest-Relativity, and Knowledge', draft of 11 January 2004, p. 46
    • (2004) , pp. 46
    • Stanley, J.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.