Interdisciplinary agendas in visual research: Re-situating visual anthropology

Visual Studies

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 179-192

  Pink, Sarah ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17744361999     PISSN: 1472586X     EISSN: 14725878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14725860310001632029     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ang, I. 1985. Watching Dallas. London: Methuen.
2. Banks, M. 2001. Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.
3. Banks, M. and Morphy, eds. 1997. Rethinking Visual Anthropology. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
4. Bateson, G. and Mead, M. 1942. Balinese Character: A Photographic Analysis. New York: New York Academy of the Sciences.
5. Chaplin, E. 1994. Sociology and Visual Representations. London: Routledge.
6. Clifford, J. 1986. “Introduction: partial truths,” in J. Clifford and G. Marcus, eds. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, Pp. 2–19.
7. Collier, J. and Collier, M. 1986. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
8. Edwards, E., ed. 1992. Anthropology & Photography 1860–1920. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press (in association with the Royal Anthropological Institute, London).
9. Edwards, E., ed. 1997. “Beyond the boundary,” in M. Banks and H. Morphy, eds. Rethinking Visual Anthropology. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, Pp. 53–80.
10. Edwards, E., ed. 2001. Raw Histories: Photographs, Anthropology and Museums, Oxford: Berg.
11. Emmison, M. and Smith, P. 2000. Researching the Visual. London: Sage.
12. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Ferrándiz, F. 1998. “A trace of fingerprints: displacements and textures in the use of ethnographic video in Venezuelan spiritism,” Visual Anthropology Review 13(2):19–38.
14. Fiske, J. 1994. “Audiencing,” in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Methods. London: Sage, Pp. 189–98.
15. Gaines, J. M. 1999. “Introduction: the real returns,” in J. M. Gaines and M. Renov, eds. Collecting Visible Evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16. Grimshaw, A. 2001. The Ethnographer’s Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Hockings, P., ed. 1995 [1975]. Principles of Visual Anthropology, 2nd edn. The Hague: Mouton.
18. Holliday, R. 2001. “We’ve been framed: visualising methodology,” The Sociological Review 48(4):503–522.
19. Hutnyk, J. 1990. “Comparative anthropology and Evans-Pritchard’s Nuer photography: photographic essay,” Critique of Anthropology (Amsterdam) 10(1):81–102.
20. Lister, M. and Wells, L. 2000. “Seeing beyond belief: cultural studies as an approach to analysing the visual,” in T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, eds. Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage, Pp. 61–91.
21. Loizos, P. 1993. Innovation in Ethnographic Film. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
22. Lutkehaus, N. and Cool, J. 1999. “Paradigms lost and found: the crisis of representation and visual anthropology,” in J. M. Gaines and M. Renov, eds. Collecting Visible Evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, Pp. 116–139.
23. MacDougall, D. 1998. Transcultural Cinema. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. McGuigan, J. 1997. Cultural Methodologies. London: Sage.
25. Mead, M. 1995 [1975]. “Visual anthropology in a discipline of words,” in P. Hockings, ed. Principles of Visual Anthropology, 2nd edn. The Hague: Mouton, Pp. 3–10.
26. Moore, H. 1999. “Anthropology at the turn of the century,” in H. Moore, ed. Anthropological Theory Today. Oxford: Polity Press, Pp. 1–23.
27. Moores, S. 1993. Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption. London: Sage.
28. Morley, D. 1992. Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
29. Nichols, B. 1991. “Pornography, ethnography, and the discourses of power,” in Representing Reality. Indiana University Press, Pp. 210–228.
30. Pauwels, L. 2000. “Taking the visual turn in research and scholarly communication,” Visual Sociology 15:7–14.
31. Pink, S. 1999. “A woman, a camera and the world of bullfighting: visual culture, experience and the production of anthropological knowledge,” Visual Anthropology 13:71–86.
32. Pink, S. 2001a. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.
33. Pink, S. 2001b. “More visualising, more methodologies: on video, reflexivity and qualitative research,” The Sociological Review 49(4):586–599.
34. Pink, S., Kurti, L. and Afonso, A. I., 2004, eds. Working Images. London: Routledge, forthcoming.
35. Rony, F. 1996. The Third Eye: Race, Cinema, and Ethnographic Spectacle. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36. Rose, G. 2001. Visual Methodologies. London: Sage.
37. Ruby, J. 2000. Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. 2000. Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage.