Teledermatology - Past, present and future;Teledermatologia - Passado, presente e futuro

Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 523-532

  Miot, Hélio Anante ^a,b   Paixão, Maurício Pedreira ^a,c   Wen, Chao Lung ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DO ABC   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dermatology; Health education; Remote consultation; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

BRAZIL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LEGAL ASPECT; LEPROSY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT MONITORING; REVIEW; SKIN CANCER; TELEDERMATOLOGY;

EID: 33846705863     PISSN: 03650596     EISSN: 18064841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0365-05962005000600011     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Pibernat MR, Peñas PF, Nebreda LB. La teledermatologia hoy. Piel. 2001; 16:225-37.
2. Vidmar DA The hystory of teledermatology in the department of defense. Dermatol Clin. 1999; 17:113-24.
3. Eedy DJ, Wootton R. Teledermatology: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2001; 144:696-707.
4. Burns DA, Cox NH. Introduction and Historical Bibliography. In: Champion RH, Burton JL, Burns T, Breathnach SM. Rook's textbook of Dermatology. 7th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2004. p.1-17.
5. Wagner RF Jr, Wagner D, Tomich JM, Wagner KD, Grande DJ. Diagnoses of skin diseases: dermatologists vs. nondermatologists. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1985; 11:476-9.
6. Chen SC, Bravata DM, Weil EBS, Olkin I. A comparison of dermatologists and primary physicians accuracy in diagnosing melanoma: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol. 2001; 137:1627-34.
7. Federman DG, Concato J, Kirsner RS. Comparison of dermatologic diagnoses by primary care practitioners and dermatologists. A review of the literature. Arch Fam Med. 1999; 8:170-2.
8. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n° 1101, de 12 de junho de 2002. Brasília (DF). Ministério da Saúde; 2002.
9. Resneck J Jr. Too few or too many dermatologists? Difficulties in assessing optimal workforce size. Arch Dermatol. 2001; 137:1295-301.
10. Recenseamento dermatológico do Estado de São Paulo: Resultados finais. [sitio na internet]. Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia - Regional. São Paulo. 2000; [citado 2005 ago 13]. Disponível em: http://www.sbd-sp.org.br/socios/Jornal/2000/edicao100/pages/recensea mento.asp.
11. Norton SA Burdick AE, Phillips CM, Berman B. Teledermatology and underserved populations. Arch Dermatol. 1997; 133:197-200.
12. Taylor P, Goldsmith P, Murray K, Harris D, Barkley A. Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals. Br J Dermatol. 2001; 144:328-33.
13. Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, et al. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: Societal cost-benefit analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2000; 6; 320:1252-6.
14. Whited JD, Datta S, Hall RP, Foy ME, Marbrey LE, Grambow SC, et al. An economic analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E-Health. 2003; 9:351-60.
15. Zelickson BD, Homan L. Teledermatology in the nursing home. Arch. Dermatol. 1997; 133:1714.
16. Rashid E, Ishtiaq O, Gilani S, Zafar A. Comparison of store and forward method of teledermatology with face-to-face consultation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2003; 15:34-6.
17. Miot HA. Desenvolvimento e sistematização da interconsulta dermatológica a distância. [tese]. Faculdade de Medicina da USP: São Paulo. 2005.
18. Oztas MO, Calikoglu E, Baz K, Birol A, Onder M, Calikoglu T, et al. Reliability of Web-based teledermatology consultations. J Telemed Telecare. 2004; 10:25-8.
19. Whited JD, Hall RP, Foy ME, Marbrey LE, Grambow SC, Dudley TK, et al. Patient and clinician satisfaction with a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E-Health. 2004; 10:422-31.
20. Kvedar JC, Edwards RA, Menn ER, Mofid M, Gonzalez E, Dover J, et al. The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. Arch Dermatol. 1997; 133:161-7.
21. High WA Houston MS, Calobrisi SD, Drage LA McEvoy MT. Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-for ward teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 42:776-83.
22. Barnard CM, Goldyne ME. Evaluation of an asynchronous teleconsultation system for diagnosis of skin cancer and other skin diseases. Telemed J E-Health. 2000; 6:379-84.
23. Krupinski EA, Lesueur B, Ellsworth L, Levine N, Hansen R, Silvis N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Telemed J. 1999; 5:257-63.
24. Du Moulin MF, Bullens-Goessens YI, Henquet CJ, Brunenberg DE, de Bruyn-Geraerds DP. The reliability of diagnosis using store-and-forward teledermatology. J Telemed Telecare. 2003; 9:249-52.
25. Lim AC, Egerton IB, See A Shumack SP. Accuracy and reliability of store-and-forward teledermatology preliminary results from the St George Teledermatology Project. Australas J Dermatol. 2001; 42:247-51.
26. Lyon CC, Harrison PV. Digital imaging and teledermatology: educational and diagnostic applications of a portable digital imaging system for the trainee dermatologist. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1997;22:163-5.
27. Lowitt MH, Kessler II, Kauffman CL, Hooper FJ, Siegel E, Burnett JW. Teledermatology and in-person examinations. Arch Dermatol. 1998; 134:471-6.
28. Gilmour E, Campbell SM, Loane MA, Esmail A, Griffiths CE, Roland MO, et al. Comparison of teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study. Br J Dermatol. 1998; 139:81-7.
29. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical management by real-time teledermatology. Results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial. J Telemed Telecare. 1998; 4:95-100.
30. Oakley AM, Astwood DR, Loane M, Duffill MB, Rademaker M, Wootton R. Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology: results of a preliminary study in New Zealand N Z Med J. 1997; 110:51-3.
31. Nordal EJ, Moseng D, Kvammen B, Lochen ML. A comparative study of teleconsultations versus face-to-face consultations. J Telemed Telecare. 2001; 7:257-65.
32. Phillips CM, Burke WA Allen MH, Stone D, Wilson JL. Reliability of telemedicine in evaluating skin tumours. Telemed J. 1998; 4:5-9.
33. Lesher JL Jr, Davis LS, Gourdin FW, English D, Thompson WO. Telemedicine evaluation of cutaneous diseases: a blinded comparative study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998; 38:27-31.
34. Scheinfeld N. The use of teledermatology to supervise dermatology residents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005; 52:378-80.
35. Oliveira MR, Festa Neto C, Rivitti EA Böhm GM, Wen CL. Low cost telemedicine tool for early diagnosis in skin cancer by paramedical staff in Brazil. Telemed J E-Health. 2001; 7:132.
36. Piccolo D, Smolle J, Argenziano G, Wolf IH, Braun R, Cerroni L, et al. Teledermoscopy - results of a multicentre study on 43 pigmented skin lesions. J Telemed Telecare. 2000; 6:132-7.
37. Piccolo D, Smolle J, Wolf IH, Ketty P, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Dell'eva G, et al. Face-to-face diagnosis vs telediagnosis of pigmented skin tumors. Arch Dermatol. 1999; 135:1467-71.
38. Castanedo-Cazares JP, Lepe V, Torres-Alvarez B, Moncada B. Easy photodermoscopy for teledermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2003; 9:18.
39. Berman B, Elgart GW, Burdick AE. Dermatopathology via a still-image telemedicine system: diagnostic concor dance with direct microscopy. Telemed J. 1997;3:27-32.
40. Piccolo D, Soyer HP, Burgdorf W, Talamini R, Peris K, Bugatti L, et al. Concordance between telepathologic diagnosis and conventional histopathologic diagnosis: a multiobserver store-and-forward study on 20 skin specimens. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:53-8.
41. Lesión quística cutánea em nalga. Uninet - Foro de diagnóstico por imagem [sitio da internet][citado ago 2005 9]. Disponível em: http://pat.uninet.edu/zope/pat/ casos/C185/index.html
42. Braum RP, Vecchietti JL, Thomas L, Prins C, French LE, Gewirtzman AJ, et al. Telemedical wound care using a new generation of mobile telephones. A feasibility study Arch Dermatol. 2005; 141:254-8.
43. van der Akker TW, Reker CHM, Knol A, Post J, Wilbrink J, Veen JPW Teledermatology as a tool for communication between general practitioners and dermatologists. J Telemed Telecare. 2001; 7:193-8.
44. Chao LW, Silveira PSP, Azevedo RS, Böhm GM. Internet discussion lists as an educational tool. J Telemed Telecare. 2000; 6:304-5.
45. Dermlist. Dermlist - Fórum de dermatologia [sitio de internet]; 2005. [citado 2005 ago 9]. Disponível em: http://www.dermlist.med.br/ DERMLIST_12 Agosto_2005.html
46. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care. J Telemed Telecare. 2000; 6 Suppl 1:S1-3.
47. Declaração de Tel Aviv sobre responsabilidades e normas éticas na utilização da telemedicina. [sitio da internet] Estação Digital Médica; 2004. [citado 2005 ago 9] Disponível em: http://www.estacaodigitalmedica.com.br/ telemedicina/declaracao_telaviv.htm.
48. RESOLUÇÃO CFM n° 1.643/2002. [sitio da internet] Conselho Federal de Medicina - CFM; 2002. Disponível em: http://www.portalmedico.org.br/resolucoes/cfm/ 2002/1643_2002.htm.
49. RESOLUÇÃO CFM n° 1.718/2004. [sitio da internet] Conselho Federal de Medicina - CFM; 2002. Disponível em: http://www.portalmedico.org.br/tesolucoes/cfm/ 2004/1718_2004.htm.
50. Araújo MG. Hanseníase no Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2003; 36:373-82.
51. Britton WJ, Lockwood DNJ. Leprosy. Lancet. 2004; 393:1209-19.
52. Chao LW, Cestari TF, Bakos L, Oliveira MR, Miot HA, Zampese M, et al. Evaluation of an Internet-based teledermatology system. J Telemed Telecare. 2003; 9 Suppl 1:S9-12.
53. Chao LW, Enokihara MY, Silveira PSP, Gomes SR, Böhm GM. Telemedicine model for training non-medical persons in the early recognition of melanoma. J Telemed Telecare. 2003; 9:81:4-7.
54. Chao LW. Modelo de ambulatório virtual (cyberambulatório) e tutor eletrônico (cybertutor) para aplicação na interconsulta médica, e educação a distância mediada por tecnologia. [tese]. Faculdade de Medicina da USP: São Paulo. 2003.