Taj Mahals or decaying shacks: Patterns in local school capital stock and unmet capital need

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1-22

  Arsen, David ^a   Davis, Thomas ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846705451     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327930pje8104_1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arsen, D., Clay, T., Davis, T., Devaney, T., Fulcher-Dawson, R., & Plank, D. (2005). Adequacy, equity and capital spending in Michigan schools: The unfinished business of Proposal A. Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://www.epc.msu.edu/publications/publications.htm
2. Arsen, D., & Plank, D. (2003). Michigan school finance under Proposal A: State control, local consequences. Retrieved March 6, 2006, from http://www.epc.msu.edu/publications/publications.htm
3. Berner, M. (1993). Building conditions, parental involvement, and student achievement in the District of Columbia public school system. Urban Education, 28, 6-29.
4. Cash, C. (1993). Building conditions and student achievement and behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
5. Cervantes, R. P. (1999). The relationship between the school building condition and academic achievement and behavior of students in selected Alabama public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
6. Crampton, F. (2003). Unmet school infrastructure funding need as a critical educational capacity issue. In F. Crampton & D. Thompson (Eds.), Saving America's school infrastructure (pp. 3-26). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
7. Crampton, F., & Thompson, D. (2002, December). The condition of America's schools: A national disgrace. School Business Affairs, pp. 15-19.
8. Crampton, F., Thompson, D., & Hagey, J. (2001). Creating and sustaining school capacity in the twenty-first century: Funding a physical environment conducive to student learning. Journal of Education Finance, 27, 633-652.
9. Earthman, G. I., Cash, C. S. & Van Berkum, D. (1995). Student achievement and behavior and school building condition. Journal of School Business Management, 8(3), 26-37.
10. Gravelle, C. M. (1998). The relationship between student achievement and school building conditions in public school districts in Idaho. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.
11. Guy, L. G. (2001). Student achievement and school condition: Examining the relationship in West Virginia high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
12. Hawkins, H., & Lilley, H. (1992). Guide for school facility appraisal. New York: Council of Educational Facility Planners International.
13. Hines, E. (1996). Building condition and student achievement and behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
14. Lanham III, J. W. (1999). Relating building and classroom conditions to student achievement in Virginia's elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
15. Lewis, M. (2001). Facility conditions and student test performance in the Milwaukee schools. Scottsdale, AZ: Council of Educational Facilities Planners International.
16. McGuffey, C., & Brown, C. (1978). The impact of school building age on school achievement in Georgia. Education Facilities Planner, 2, 5-19.
17. O'Neill, D. J. (2000). The impact of school facilities on student achievement, behavior, attendance, and teacher turnover rate at selected Texas middle schools in Region XIII ESC. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
18. Picus, L., Marion, S., Calvo, N., & Glenn, W. (2005). Understanding the relationship between student achievement and the quality of educational facilities: Evidence from Wyoming. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 71-95.
19. Schneider, M. (2003). Linking school facility conditions to teacher satisfaction and success. Retrieved July 9, 2005, from http://www.edfacilities.org/pubs/teachersurvey.pdf
20. Seilke, C. (2003). Financing school infrastructure needs: An overview across the 50 states. In F. Crampton & D. Thompson (Eds.), Saving America's school infrastructure (pp. 27-52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
21. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1995). School facilities: Conditions of America's schools (Report No. GAO/HEHS-95-61). Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://www.gao.gov/archive/1995/he95061.pdf